1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
marbury v. madison
judicial review
marbury v. madison clause
article 3
mcculloch v. maryland
implied powers for congress under necessary and proper clause
mcculloch v. maryland clause
necessary and proper clause, supremacy clause
schenck v. united states
free speech can be restricted when it poses a “clear and present danger”
schenck v. united states clause
1st amendment freedom of speech
brown v. board of education
racial segregation is unconstitutional; “separate but equal” is inherently unequal
brown v. board of education clause
14th amendment equal protection clause
baker v. carr
allowed the federal court the power to hear cases that claimed redistricting was unconstitutional
baker v. carr clause
14th amendment equal protection clause
engel v. vitale
states cannot require prayers in public schools
engel v. vitale clause
1st amendment establishment clause
gideon v. wainwright
guarantees right of legal counsel for criminal defendants
gideon v. wainwright clause
6th amendment via 14th amendment due process clause (selective incorporation)
tinker v. des moines independent community school district
protest in schools can take place if they do not cause a “substantial disruption”
tinker v. des moines independent community school district clause
1st amendment freedom of speech/protest
korematsu v. united states
internment of japanese americans during ww2 based on “pressing public necessity”
new york times v. united states
freedom of press to criticize government, established prior restraint
new york times v. united states
1st amendment freedom of press
wisconsin v. yoder
free exercise of religion outlaws state law
wisconsin v. yoder clause
1st amendment free exercise clause
shaw v. reno
racial gerrymandering violates equal protection clause
shaw v. reno clause
14th amendment equal protection clause
united states v. lopez
limiting congress’s power to regulate activity that has no “substantial effect” on interstate commerce
united states v. lopez clause
10th amendment, commerce clause