1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is the legal principle of intoxication?
intoxication can be a defence to a criminal offence only if it prevents the defendant from forming the mens rea (MR) of the crime.It is not a defence in itself, but a denial of MR due to intoxication.
What's the difference between voluntary and involuntary intoxication?
Voluntary intoxication: D willingly consumes drugs/alcohol knowing the effects.
Involuntary intoxication: D is intoxicated without knowledge or against their will (e.g., spiked drink or unexpected side effect of prescribed drug).
What is a specific intent crime?
A crime that requires intention only as the MR (e.g., murder, s18 GBH, theft).🔹 Recklessness is not enough.
What is a basic intent crime?
A crime where recklessness is sufficient as the MR (e.g., assault, battery, s20 GBH, manslaughter).
What happens if someone is voluntarily intoxicated and commits a specific intent crime?
If intoxication prevents D from forming the intent, they may be acquitted.
📌 Key Case: DPP v Beard (1920) - D too drunk to form intent to rape = not guilty of murder.
BUT: If D had MR despite intoxication → guilty.
voluntarily intoxicated and commits a basic intent crime?
The defence will not succeed.
📌 Key Case: DPP v Majewski (1977) - voluntary intoxication is not a defence to crimes of basic intent.➡ Being reckless by choosing to get drunk counts as the MR.
What if someone is involuntarily intoxicatedWhat if someone is involuntarily intoxicated
D can use the defence for both basic and specific intent crimes, if they lacked MR.
📌 Key Case: R v Kingston (1994) - even if intoxicated involuntarily, if D did have MR, he's guilty.
ntoxication by prescribed drugs
If D took the drug properly and suffered an unexpected side effect, this is involuntary intoxication.
📌 Key Case: R v Hardie (1985) - D took Valium (a calming drug) but became aggressive. Court said he couldn't have expected this.
Is the law on intoxication fair?
✅ Ensures personal responsibility
❌ Confusing distinction between basic/specific intent
❌ Harsh on people genuinely lacking MR (e.g. Kingston)🔍 Law Commission has called for reform (2015)