Ad Hominem
“Against the Man”, personal attacks
Begging the Question
Circular Reasoning
Assuming the conclusion
Restating the premise
Assuming the conclusion is true
Assuming the conclusion is true in a different way
Either or Reasoning
Assuming extremes/polar opposites and not considering any alternatives.
Emotional Appeal
Too many emotions/pathos.
False Analogy
When 2 cases are not parallel enough to lead readers to accept a connection between them.
Generalization
Writer bases a claim upon an isolated example and applies it to all instances
Non-Sequitur
“It does not follow”. One statement isn’t logically connected to another.
Post hoc Ergo proctor hoc
“After this therefore because of this”. Assuming that because one thing occurred after another, it must have occurred as a result of it.
Red Herring
When an irrelevant issue is raised as an attempt to distract
Straw Man
Arguing against a claim that nobody actually holds.
Bandwagon Appeal/Ad Populum
Claim that an idea is right just because a lot of people agree with it.
Force and Fear/Ad Baculum
Proponent threatens audience to accept argument. Fear mongering.
Appeal to Celebrity(Authority)/Ad Verecundiam
Appeal to an authority figure irrelevant to the argument
Pity/Ad Misericordium
Appeal to accept an argument out of pity for the arguer
Non Disproof
Argument should be accepted because no one has proved it wrong, not because anyone has proved it right
Undistributed Middle
Parts of a premise may or may not overlap. Middle term is undistributed in the sense that all instances of a conclusion are also instances of the premise.
ex. “All whales have hair, all humans have hair, all whales are human”