1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
strengths - primary precepts
primary precepts are relatively uncontroversial, they are goods valued by all societies
primary precepts are easy to understand and apply
strengths - natural law
real/apparent goods line up with natural law
flexibility in application of the secondary precepts
assures human rights such as the right to life (preservation of innocent life)
affirms the importance of reason and ability to reason - imago dei
telos offers us a purpose
absolutist theory meaning that there is clarity to what is good and to its judgements
weakness - primary precepts
primary precepts are too vague
tension between primary and secondary precepts
weakness - natural law
basic goods across society and history vary greatly
cannot apply if you do not believe in god
not everyone is capable of reasoning
naturalistic fallacy- just because something is doesnt mean something should be/is good
absolutist theory so it can be too restrictive and focused on achieving primary precepts; theory can contradict itself
strengths - doctrine of double effect
allows for flexibility
recognises complexity of real life
weaknesses - doctrine of double effect
cannot know intentions
seems to excuse moral behaviour