social psychology exam 1

studied byStudied by 2 people
4.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

self discrepancy theory

1 / 210

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

211 Terms

1

self discrepancy theory

perception of discrepancies bw a persons self concept and varioys guides is linked to spf negative emotional states

New cards
2

actual self

that which we are now

New cards
3

ideal self

that which we would ideally like to be

New cards
4

ought self

that which we think we ought to be

New cards
5

self esteem

how you regard yourself

New cards
6

self compassion

an orientation to care for yourself, affects how you deal w life events

New cards
7

self reference

self relevant info is processed faster and remembered better

New cards
8

confirmatory hypothesis testing

pp selectively draw on info to support hypothesis

New cards
9

counterfactual thinking

easier it is to mentally undo an event, the strong the rxn to that event

New cards
10

schema

cognitive structure pp havew to organize their knowledge about the social world by themes and subjects

New cards
11

person schema

contain pp understanding of psych of indv focusing on traits and goals

New cards
12

self schema

knowlege about ourself

New cards
13

role schema

cognitive structuure that org ones knowlege about behavior

New cards
14

achieve role

student doctor, etc are examples of

New cards
15

ascribe role

women, daughter, etc are ex of

New cards
16

event schema (script)

appropriate sequences of events in well known situations

New cards
17

internal attribution

the inference that a person is behaving in a certain way because of something about the person, such as attitude, character, or personality

New cards
18

external attribution

The inference that a person is behaving a certain way because of something about the situation he or she is in; the assumption is that most people would respond the same way in that situation

New cards
19

Kelley's Covariation Model

a theory that states that to form an attribution about what caused a person's behavior, we systematically note the pattern between the presence or absence of possible causal factors and whether the behavior occurs

consensus, distinctiveness, consensus

New cards
20

consensus

extent that others act similar

if others agree: high

New cards
21

distinctiveness

extent that the situation is highly irregular or unusual

if person d.n. act same to other stim: high

there something distinct about stim: high

New cards
22

consistency

how the person reacts to the stim on other occations

behav is constant w that stim: high

New cards
23

int

int/ext attribution

low consensus

low distinctiveness

high consistency

New cards
24

ext

int/ext attribution

high consensus

high distinctiveness

high consistency

New cards
25

fundamental attribution error

tendency to focus on the role of the personal causes and underestimate the impact of the situation on others behavior

due to

- perceptual bias

- motivation (beliefs in a just world)

- automatic dispositional attribution

- culture

New cards
26

actor observer effect

tendency to attribute our own behavior to situational causes and the behavior of others to personal factors

New cards
27

multiple causal factors

Causal factors rarely (if ever) act alone.

Cause is the cumulative effect of multiple factors acting together.

New cards
28

discounting principle

process of reducing a belief in one potential cause of behavior bc there is another viable cause

New cards
29

social psychology

The scientific study of how people influence each other's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.

New cards
30

thinking influence behavior

Social psychology focuses on three main areas:

social _________

social _________

social _________

New cards
31

sociology

The study of human society and social behavior at the group level.

New cards
32

Anthropology

The study of culture and human behavior over time.

New cards
33

clinical psychology (counseling psychology)

A subfield of psychology that helps people who have maladaptive or problematic

thoughts and behaviors.

New cards
34

positive psychology

The scientific study of human strengths, virtues, positive emotions, and achievements.

New cards
35

Wilhelm Wundt

german physiologist who founded psychology as a formal science; opened first psychology research laboratory in 1879

New cards
36

kurt lewin

1890-1947; father of social psychology; Contributions: German refugee who escaped Nazis, proved the democratic style of leadership is the most productive; Studies: Leadership syles-studied effects of 3 leadership styles on children completing activities

New cards
37

interaction

The combination of several influences on an outcome, such as the influence of both personality and

environment on behavior.

New cards
38

nature

Influences on our thoughts and behaviors that come from biology or physiology, such as genetics,

hormones, or brain differences.

New cards
39

nurture

Influences on our thoughts and behaviors that come from biology or physiology, such as genetics,

hormones, or brain differences.

New cards
40

False Dichotomy

A situation presented as two opposing and mutually exclusive options when both options may work

together, such as the role of nature and nurture in determining human behavior.

New cards
41

comparative

Species-level comparisons of social behavior usually used to determine the

uniqueness of human behavior.

New cards
42

Action research

the application of scientific principles to social problems solving in the real world

New cards
43

random assignment to groups

A technique in which every participant in an experiment has equal probability of

being assigned to each group. This means that extraneous variables are also likely to be evenly distributed.

New cards
44

single blind experiment

A tool used by psychologists to reduce bias where the participants do not know whether

they are in the control group or the experimental group. This reduces the likelihood that hopes or expectations can

influence outcomes.

New cards
45

double blind experiment

A tool used by psychologists to reduce bias where neither the participants nor the

researchers know whether the participants are in the control group or the experimental group. This reduces the

likelihood that hopes or expectations can influence outcomes.

New cards
46

falsification

A tool used by psychologists to reduce bias where neither the participants nor the

researchers know whether the participants are in the control group or the experimental group. This reduces the

likelihood that hopes or expectations can influence outcomes.

New cards
47

Critical thinking

The ability to analyze, apply, and explore ideas in new and open-minded ways.

New cards
48

basic research

increase our understanding of psychology by creating and improving the

theories that predict social behavior.

New cards
49

applied research

translate the findings of basic researchers into social action and apply

psychological ideas to the real world.

New cards
50

scientific method

A systematic way of creating knowledge by observing, forming a hypothesis, testing a hypothesis,

and interpreting the results. The scientific method helps psychologists conduct experiments and formulate theories

in a logical and objective manner.

New cards
51

hypothesis

A specific statement made by a researcher before conducting a study about the expected outcome of

the study based on prior observation. Hypotheses are falsifiable statements that researchers believe to be true (see

New cards
52

constructs

Theoretical ideas that cannot be directly observed, such as attitudes, personality, attraction, or how we

think.

New cards
53

operationalize

The process of specifying how a construct will be defined and measured.

New cards
54

archival data

Stored information that was originally created for some other purpose not related to research that can

later be used by psychologists, such as census data.

New cards
55

naturalistic observation

A research design where scientists gather data by observing people in the environment

within which the behavior naturally occurs (for instance, observing leadership styles in a corporate office).

New cards
56

reactivity

When people change their behavior simply because they're being observed (see social desirability bias

and good subject bias ).

New cards
57

participant observation

A technique used during naturalistic observation where scientists covertly disguise

themselves as people belonging in an environment in an effort to observe more authentic social behaviors.

New cards
58

survey

A research design where researchers collect data by asking participants to respond to questions or

statements.

New cards
59

self report scale

A type of survey item where participants give information about themselves by selecting their own

responses (see survey ).

New cards
60

social desirability bias

The tendency for participants to provide dishonest responses so that others have positive

impressions of them.

New cards
61

case study

: A type of research where scientists conduct an in-depth study on a single example of an event or a

single person to test a hypothesis.

New cards
62

PsycINFO database

The most comprehensive database of research books and journal articles across

psychological subdisciplines.

New cards
63

preexperiment

A research design in which a single group of people is tested to see whether some kind of treatment

has an effect, such as a one-shot case study or a one-group pretest-posttest.

New cards
64

one shot case study

A type of preexperimental research design that explores an event, person, or group in great

detail by identifying a particular case of something or trying a technique once, then observing the outcome.

New cards
65

one group pretest protest design

: A type of preexperimental research design in which the expected outcome is

measured both before and after the treatment to assess change.

New cards
66

confounding variables

Co-occurring influences that make it impossible to logically determine causality.

]

such as bad weather or the inability to concentrate on a survey due to illness, provide

alternate explanations for the outcome of an experiment that make it impossible to know whether the results are due

to the independent variable (see internal validity ).

New cards
67

experiment

A research design where scientists randomly assign participants to groups and systematically compare

changes in behavior. Experiments allow scientists to control confounding variables and establish cause-effect

relationships.

New cards
68

random assignment to experimental condition

A solution to the problem of confounding variables by creating

equivalent groups at the start of an experiment. Random assignment cancels out the influence of confounds by

distributing them equally across groups.

New cards
69

independent variable

A variable that is manipulated at the beginning of an experiment to determine its effect on the

dependent variable.

New cards
70

dependent variable

The measured outcome of an experiment that is affected by the independent variable.

New cards
71

pretest posttest control group design

: A type of true experiment where the dependent variable is tested both before

and after the experimental manipulation.

New cards
72

quasiexperiment

a group of participants in a true experiment that serves as a neutral or baseline group that receives no

treatment.

New cards
73

control group

A type of true experiment where the dependent variable is measured for two or

more groups, including a control group, only after the experimental manipulation.

New cards
74

posttest only control group design

An experimental research design where the levels or conditions of the independent

variable are different for each group of participants; patterns are found by comparing the responses betweterm-219en groups.

New cards
75

between participant design

An experimental research design where the same group of participants all experience

each experimental condition; patterns are found by comparing responses for each condition.

New cards
76

within participant design

An experimental research design where the same group of participants all experience

each experimental condition; patterns are found by comparing responses for each condition.

New cards
77

order effect

A research design where outcomes are compared across different groups that have not been

formed through random assignment but instead occur naturally.

New cards
78

correlation design

A research design where scientists analyze two or more variables to determine their relationship

or association with each other.

New cards
79

statistics

Mathematical analyses that reveal patterns in data, such as correlations, t tests, and analyses of variance.

New cards
80

standard deviation

The amount of variability in a distribution. In other words, how widely dispersed the data are.

New cards
81

t test

A statistical test that uses both the mean and the standard deviation to compare the difference between two

groups.

New cards
82

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

: A statistical test that uses both the mean and the standard deviation to compare the

differences between three or more groups.

New cards
83

correlation

: A type of statistical test that determines whether two or more variables are systematically associated with

each other by identifying linear patterns in data.

New cards
84

scatterplot

A graph that demonstrates the relationship between two quantitative variables by displaying plotted

participant responses.

New cards
85

correlation coefficient

A number that indicates the relationship or association between two quantitative variables. It

ranges from -1.00 to +1.00.

New cards
86

positive correlation

A positive correlation occurs when the correlation coefficient is between +0.01 and +1.00. In thiscase, as one variable increases, the other also increases.

New cards
87

negative correlation

A negative correlation occurs when the correlation coefficient is between -0.01 and -1.00. In

this case, as one variable increases, the other decreases.

New cards
88

statistical significance

The likelihood that the results of an experiment are due to the independent variable, not

chance (see p value ).

New cards
89

p value

A number that indicates the probability or likelihood that a pattern of data would have been found by random

chance. Commonly seen as a variation of " p < .05," which, in this example, means there is a less than 5% probability

the patterns are due to chance.

New cards
90

reliability

consistency of measurement

New cards
91

internal validity

extent to which we can draw cause-and-effect inferences from a study

the extent to which results are interpreted in an

accurate way.

New cards
92

external validity

extent to which we can generalize findings to real-world settings

the extent to which results could apply to other people or settings.

New cards
93

Generalizability

the extent to which we can claim our findings inform us about a group larger than the one we studied

New cards
94

random sampling

a sample that fairly represents a population because each member has an equal chance of inclusion

diverse

New cards
95

replication

repeating the essence of a research study, usually with different participants in different situations, to see whether the basic finding extends to other participants and circumstances

New cards
96

institutional review boards (IRBs)

Committees of people who consider the ethical implications of any study before

giving the researcher approval to begin formal research.

New cards
97

American Psychological Association (APA)

A large organization of professional psychologists who provide those in

the field with information in the form of scholarly publications, citation style guidelines, and ethical standards for

research.

New cards
98

informed consent

Participants' right to be told what they will be asked to do and whether there are any potential

dangers or risks involved before a study begins.

New cards
99

deception

: Hiding the true nature of an experiment from a participant to prevent a change in how the participant

would respond.

New cards
100

right to withdraw

: The right participants have to stop being in a study at any time, for any reason, or to skip questions

on a survey if they are not comfortable answering them.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 2822 people
Updated ... ago
4.9 Stars(9)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 57 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 18 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 123 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 10 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 26 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 178 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard50 terms
studied byStudied by 17 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard467 terms
studied byStudied by 14 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard56 terms
studied byStudied by 1 person
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard48 terms
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard51 terms
studied byStudied by 6 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard24 terms
studied byStudied by 9 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard65 terms
studied byStudied by 12 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard777 terms
studied byStudied by 15 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(3)