1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Sherif
Light
Jenness
Jellybean
Asch
Conformity
75% of all ps conformed atleast once
Levels dropped to 12% after confederates answers
Lucas
Maths
Perrin and Spencer (conformity-explanations)
Science and engineering students
Deutsch and Gerrard
Which SI?
Evaluation for explanations of conformity
Supporting evidence- NSI- Asch
Supporting evidence- ISI- Lucas
Individual differences - Perrin and Spencer
Which SI occurring- Deutsch and Gerrard
Evaluation for research into conformity
High reliability
Temporal validity
Ecological validity
Culturally relative
Ethical validity
Perrin and Spencer (conformity-research)
369 trials
Smith and Bond
Meta analysis
Average rate of conformity- 31%
Fiji- 58%
Belgium- 14%
Zimbardo
Conformity to social roles
Evaluation for conformity into social roles
High demand characteristics
Contradictory replications- Reicher and Haslam
Ethical validity
Real world atrocities
Reicher and Haslam
Zimbardo replication
Milgram
Obedience
65%- 450v
100%- 300v
12.5%- stopped at 300v when learner objected
Location
Obedience went down to 47.5%
Proximity to learner
Obedience went down to 40%
Proximity to authority figure
Obedience went down to 20%
Security guard
Obedience rate- 76%
Milkman
Obedience rate- 47%
Pedestrian
Obedience rate- 30%
Evaluation into obedience
High reliability
Demand characteristics
Ethical validity
Sampling bias
Ecological validity
Evaluation for situational explanation for obedience
SE- legitimate authority- Bickman
SE- agentic state- Blass and Schmitt
Explain real world atrocities
Incomplete
Bickman
Uniform
Blass and Schmitt
OG footage
Evaluation for dispositional explanation for obedience
SE- Milgram and Elms- link
Contradictory evidence
Incomplete
Alternative factors
Milgram and Elms
Link
Lack some traits
Evaluation into situational factors into social support
SE- conformity- variation of Asch
SE- obedience-variation of Milgram
Methodological flaws
Ecological validity
Evaluation into dispositional factors into resistance
SE- conformity- Holland- Milgram replication
SE- obedience-Oliner and Oliner- Jews
Self report methods
Alternative explanations
Holland
Replication of Milgram
Oliner and Oliner
Jews
Moscovici
Minority influence
Evaluation for minority influence
SE- consistency- Wood et al- meta analysis
SE- flexibility- Nemeth- ski accident
Lack external validity
Nemeth
Flexibility
Wood et al
Consistency
Evaluation into social change
SE- Nolan et al- energy
Indirect + delayed
Individual differences
Nolan et al
Energy