What does Tom Regan argue about animals? Animals have moral rights, just like humans. What are moral rights? Strong rules that protect individuals from harm and limit what others can do to them. Why are rights considered to override benefits? Because rights provide strong protections that cannot be ignored for the greater good. What is an example illustrating the concept of moral rights? The Mickey Mantle case, where taking his organs to save three lives is wrong because he has a right to bodily integrity. How does Regan view the use of animals in research? Using animals in research is wrong because their rights override any benefits to humans. What is the difference between animal welfare and animal rights? Animal welfare advocates for kind treatment and better conditions, while animal rights argues against using animals at all. What does Regan say about utilitarianism? He rejects it because it can justify harming one individual for the benefit of many. What criteria does Regan suggest for determining who has rights? Rational autonomy and sentience, with sentience being a better criterion as it includes vulnerable humans and many animals. What is the implication of granting rights based on sentience? Many animals qualify for rights, meaning they should not be used in labs. What is Regan's big conclusion regarding rights? If we grant rights to vulnerable humans, we must also grant rights to animals that feel pain. What does Regan propose regarding animal research? He advocates for the abolition of animal research, not just reforms. What does Regan mean by 'empty cages'? Animals should not be used at all, contrasting with the idea of providing bigger cages. What moral issue does Regan highlight with Nazi experiments? They were wrong even if they provided useful medical information, as they violated the rights of individuals. How does Regan view the pleasure of the four boys abusing a girl? He considers their pleasure morally irrelevant compared to the rights of the girl. What does Regan argue about the treatment of animals? Animals should not be used for human benefit, as it violates their rights. What is the stance of animal welfare advocates? They believe in treating animals kindly and avoiding unnecessary pain while still allowing their use for human benefit. What does Regan's philosophy imply for societal views on animals? It challenges society to recognize and respect the moral rights of animals. What is the relationship between rights and benefits in Regan's argument? Rights are stronger than benefits and should not be compromised for utilitarian outcomes. What does Regan's view imply for vulnerable humans? If we protect the rights of vulnerable humans, we must extend similar protections to animals. What is the ultimate goal of Regan's argument? To abolish animal research and promote the recognition of animal rights- Tom Regan

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

What does Tom Regan argue about animals?

Animals have moral rights, just like humans.

2
New cards

What are moral rights?

Strong rules that protect individuals from harm and limit what others can do to them.

3
New cards

Why are rights considered to override benefits?

Because rights provide strong protections that cannot be ignored for the greater good.

4
New cards

What is an example illustrating the concept of moral rights?

The Mickey Mantle case, where taking his organs to save three lives is wrong because he has a right to bodily integrity.

5
New cards

How does Regan view the use of animals in research?

Using animals in research is wrong because their rights override any benefits to humans.

6
New cards

What is the difference between animal welfare and animal rights?

Animal welfare advocates for kind treatment and better conditions, while animal rights argues against using animals at all.

7
New cards

What does Regan say about utilitarianism?

He rejects it because it can justify harming one individual for the benefit of many.

8
New cards

What criteria does Regan suggest for determining who has rights?

Rational autonomy and sentience, with sentience being a better criterion as it includes vulnerable humans and many animals.

9
New cards

What is the implication of granting rights based on sentience?

Many animals qualify for rights, meaning they should not be used in labs.

10
New cards

What is Regan's big conclusion regarding rights?

If we grant rights to vulnerable humans, we must also grant rights to animals that feel pain.

11
New cards

What does Regan propose regarding animal research?

He advocates for the abolition of animal research, not just reforms.

12
New cards

What does Regan mean by 'empty cages'?

Animals should not be used at all, contrasting with the idea of providing bigger cages.

13
New cards

What moral issue does Regan highlight with Nazi experiments?

They were wrong even if they provided useful medical information, as they violated the rights of individuals.

14
New cards

How does Regan view the pleasure of the four boys abusing a girl?

He considers their pleasure morally irrelevant compared to the rights of the girl.

15
New cards

What does Regan argue about the treatment of animals?

Animals should not be used for human benefit, as it violates their rights.

16
New cards

What is the stance of animal welfare advocates?

They believe in treating animals kindly and avoiding unnecessary pain while still allowing their use for human benefit.

17
New cards

What does Regan's philosophy imply for societal views on animals?

It challenges society to recognize and respect the moral rights of animals.

18
New cards

What is the relationship between rights and benefits in Regan's argument?

Rights are stronger than benefits and should not be compromised for utilitarian outcomes.

19
New cards

What does Regan's view imply for vulnerable humans?

If we protect the rights of vulnerable humans, we must extend similar protections to animals.

20
New cards

What is the ultimate goal of Regan's argument?

To abolish animal research and promote the recognition of animal rights.