1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Cooperation vs competition
Cooperation compromises must benefit my genes/traits to survive (better to receive cooperation)
Depends on trust
Previous history (have memory of person and reputation) Social norms for exchange (+ their reinforcement e.g. not paying taxes). An intrinsic bias (basic need) for fairness and kindness
Altruism
Stimulus: someone in need or distress
response: helping
Selfless act
No personal reward but entails some degree of cost (e.g. danger, time effort) but could have psychological reward
4 reasons why altruism help survive evolution
Kin selection, reciprocal altruism/direct reciprocity, sexual selection and indirect reciprocity
Kin selection
Survival chances of some same trait you have. If an individual helps their kin then there is a greater chance that the helping trait will survive, because there is a greater chance that their kin also carry this same trait. Only if helping outweighs the cost
C < r * B (r = probability kin will inherit trait) (e.g. squirrels sharing nuts)
Reciprocal altruism/direct reciprocity
Principles of trade and exchange (I’ll scratch your back if you’ll scratch mine) They have to be able to distinguish between their cospecifics and remember previous behavior of specific individuals. If you can’t remember they may free-load (aka optimal solution)
Sexual selection
Those who are generous with their time and resources deem to be more attractive (e.g. sign of wealth) has to outweigh costs (e.g. peacocks huge feather not handy but best to find partner)
Indirect reciprocity
Helping after being helped or helping others who are good helpers (even when we’ve never met or see them again) helping others increases reputation and that other will help you
Computational modeling, direct reciprocity
Agents, freeload, cooperate, or other and pairs interactions result in fitness changes. Freeloaders +3 then cooperator -1, people who cooperated didn’t do so in next rounds, cooperation dies out
Two cooperators receive both +2 or both freeloaders less or no points
Population with freeloaders and cooperation (cooperation always dies out). But in population of selective corporators (tit-for-tat) won’t die out
Batons empathy-altruism model
Researchers describe in detail particular scenario to the participants (e.g. Relating to an eviction) and asked to write level of help they would offer. Empathetic concern, predicts, helping behavior but not selfish motives (e.g. guilt, shame, personal distress, fear of social disapproval)
Altruism in humans
often unconscious. But we should not say bats want/like helping because do they have a mental state? We should also not conclude that all human altruistic behavior reflects a conscious motivation to help.
Unconscious implicit altruism
Study 1: voluntary and anonymous donations to office milk fund, influenced by picture on donation box with one week a picture of flowers and another week a picture of eyes
Study 2: donations to charity increased after their mannerisms have been slightly imitated
Empathy and altruism
We help others because we care about their welfare not to spread our genes
Study: empathic motivations come from personal distress (selfish rather than selfless) decision based on costs of helping/not helping
Criticism Batsons empathy-altruism model
Assumes a clear distinction between self and other in empathy not supported by many neuroscientific findings
FMRI charity donation
choosing to donate activates ventral and dorsal striatum even if it costs more (joy of giving), before actually donating mPFC activates and when not donating LOFC