1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Introduction/Byzantines in General
They centered around Constantinople
Their empire eventually fell
Led to a lot of history / things we have in the present
Important to consider all views and complexity
Religion in General
Christianity
Not always doing what they said
Term “Byzantine”
Called themselves “Romans” → identity
Sometimes spoke greek or were culturally broader than Romans
Constantinople was originally a small greek fishing port called “Byzantium”
Byzantium/Constantinople
On bridge between Greece and Asia minor
Constantine then founded new capital there → “Constantinople”
Term “Byzantine:” Constantinople
Became a trade center
Diverse, global influence and people
Term “Byzantine:” Hieronymus Wolf
Wanted to separate Christianity
Published Corpus (body) of Byzantium
Led to the name
Took awhile to catch on, people still called it Eastern Roman
Term “Byzantine:” More on Term
Old historians rarely called them “Byzantines”
Greek view of them due to language
Byzantine = Roman ideas and Greek philosophy
Term “Byzantine:” Other Areas
Asia minor
Middle East
Egypt
Italy
Africa
People in these areas influenced the Byzantines. As a result, they are a diverse mix of cultures. There are many arguments over how to put them in a box, though … are they Romans"? But pigeonholing does not allow to show their uniqueness and blend.
Triple Fusion
Greek intellect
Roman body
Culture of Asia and Middle East
Leadership
1st emperor: Constantine
1st empress: His mother Helena
Last emperor: Constantine 11
Last empress: Helena
Constantine and Constantinople
Show fusion and diversity
Constantinople is a beacon
“Safe,” peaceful area
Constantine and Constantinople: Fall
1453
Leader wants to restore for Ottomans
1923: Becomes Istanbul
“Istanbulan:” “The City” in Greek, what Byzantines would say
Byzantine Civilization Experiences
1st place to experience Islam
Asks for western aid → related to first crusade
Constantinople library has a ton of religious/language writing
Greek, Roman, Christian, Jewish
Byzantine Civilization Experiences: Library Issues
4th crusade: burning library
Ottoman takeover
1204
Byzantine Civilization Experiences: Christianity
Decisions about figures’ roles, images
Important meeting
Why isn’t it talked about?
Based on which historians are writing about it
There was lots of interest in France before enlightenment
Why isn’t it talked about: Enlightenment
Edward Gibbon’s history of Roman empire → Roman fascination pre-christ
Leads to categorizing periods (medieval, middle ages, etc)
Historians wanted order and reasoning
Gibbon is against Byzantines and thinks they are less impressive than Romans
Why isn’t it talked about: Foreign Policy
Byzantines liked buying people off instead of fighting
Logic of bribes … ex: Persians
Reasoning:
Bribes/cash are cheaper than war
Less cost of human lives
Gibbon didn’t think of this, glorified Roman wars instead
Why isn’t it talked about: Gap of Study and Change from It
“Not worth it”
~100 years, through 1800s
Major transformation in Europe in 1800s … enlightenment
Diel in France wanted more info on the gap after Romans
He wrote a text on Byzantine empresses, started rejuvenation of ideas
Unique that women had power and influence
Basilla and Ostrogorsky started writing (Russian and German influenced)
Wrote about male dominance instead of women’s unique roles
Byzantines themselves emphasized female power more
Historians come from their biases and contexts, so their views are based on that
INCLUDING Proctor!
Primary source = secondary source?
Why isn’t it talked about: “Secret History”
About Justinian (emperor) and wife
Byzantines loved lists and documenting
This text doesn’t reference any Byzantine documents
“A bit suspect” —Proctor, no one else backed up
Said wife "(Theodora) was actually a sex worker, but no one actually cared at the point she was alive
Also said the leaders were actually demons
A lot of historical writing uses it and doesn’t even qualify it
Shows issues of Byzantine scholars … who to listen to?
Why isn’t it talked about: The Brother and Sister
Emperor signed everything
Empress did the leadership
Important time in Christianity
Scholars often ignore primary sources about her power
Why isn’t it talked about: Byzantine Flaws
Made a lot of mistakes
Still valuable and important in history
Their political system barely changed for 1100 years
People and church always had a voice
Byzantine Power Structures
Military
People
Church
Senate #2 sort of
Need at least 2 to agree for emperors/empresses to enact leadership about something
Judith Herrin
Making Byzantines more approachable
1980s, alive now
John Julius Norwich
Great productive writer
Not that academic
Excerpts
Taking old ideas and blending
Trying to right earlier wrongs
Still not as much about women as Byzantines actually were
Christianity Before: When did Byzantium Even Start?
Opening of Constantinople?
Greek becoming formal language of empire?
Last “Roman” emperor?
When Constantine won a battle in 312?
Us: Start in 300s
Christianity Before: Foundations
1st century AD
Romans didn’t think a monotheistic community was any more than a small cult
Similar thoughts about Asia minor cults
Saw it as offshoot of Judaism
Romans had problems with Jews, but tolerated
More worry as it spread and grew
Didn’t like that following was mostly poor … fearful of them and how large of a group they were
Feared ideologies
Egalitarianism
New testament
Idea that all Christians were one = equal
Romans didn’t like equality because of their social stratification
Early Christian communities practiced equality (ex: women)
Romans started restricting and persecuting
Christians got more secretive, causing more surrounding suspicion
Christianity Before: Nero
Ruled Romans
Complexity
Story is that in 64, he mass persecutes Christians
Wanted them to give up their religion
Public executions for those who didn’t
Wanted to show how bad being Christian was
Christians surprisingly are chill about death
Similar to Roman Republic soldiers
→ Curiosity about Christians
Succession in Ruling
Senior emperors (2) and junior emperors (2)
Tetrarchy: Augusti and ceasars
4 equals would be too hard
Trying to give succession order
Historical Thought about the Byzantines: Tension/Lack
With westerners
There’s actually a lot we can learn from them → about us now
Historical Thought about the Byzantines: Romans’ Institutions
Emperors like monarchs, also senate
Military
Not much local government interaction
Emperors’ private and public life/wealth was all the same
No middle class, slaves
Historical Thought about the Byzantines: Christian Church
Bishop leadership in each area
Deciding theology: bible, father, son, holy spirit
Historical Thought about the Byzantines: Geographical Background
Mild mediterranean climate
Nile valley and other inland areas for agriculture
Asia minor for grazing in the center of the empire
Historical Thought about the Byzantines: Sources
Similar to ancient in the beginning
Lists
Malalas: Christianity, emphasized them as central, not about women
Written sources from within and outside
Other sources: Artifacts like coins and seals
Churches
Art: painting (often religious), jewelry
Crisis of the 3rd Century: Roman Collapse
“Military anarchy”
Possibly due to succession issues
Possibly due to lack of provincial/city government
Crisis of the 3rd Century: Emperor Issues
End of Severan Dynasty
Decius: persecuted Christians
Valerian
Civil wars
Crisis of the 3rd Century: Trying to Recover
Gallienus tolerated Christians, led to recovery
Claudius: died early
Aurelian: getting back Roman power, but then still a lot of turnover and instability after
Crisis of the 3rd Century: SPICES Issues
Civil war
Who’s the emperor?
Fiscal issues
Inflation
Christian persecution
Neoplatonism: imperial world
Gnosticism: magic, astrology, Hermes
Crisis of the 3rd Century: Diocletian’s Reforms
Military rule
Idea of junior and senior emperors
Emperor was sacred
Administrative reforms like separation of church and civil issues in government
Increasing civil bureaucracy
Military: reform with militias and field armies
Taxes and collection to solve economic issues
Trying to reduce inflation
Coin values and metals
Uniformity in how emperors were supposed to be
Great Persecution of Christians
Byzantine Art: General
Often religious figures
Timeless icons that inspire response
SPICES in relation to it
Hard to distinguish from neighboring areas
Some secular as well
Byzantine Art: Constantinople Design
City became superior, but slowly
Walls around it, still like that
Aqueduct system
Statue of Constantine
Faced fire damage
Christian foundation / origins are disputed
Roman design/tech, gets more Christian over time
Church building developed the city into the emperor’s central
Christian Art
Hardly any before the 240s
Use of marble
Also outside of Constantinople and variety of materials
Byzantine Art: Categorizing
Is it western? How distinctly not?
When did antiquity end?
Chronology is complicated
Byzantine Art: Mosaics
In rotunda, Christian and Saint symbolism
Hard to date…late 300s? 400s or 500s?
Comparing art can show continuity and change
Christian calendar year is shown