1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
fourth amendment
no unreasonable searches or seizures
prohibits evidence from unreasonable searches and seizures from being used in court (exclusionary rule)
this deters law enforcement from doing this
fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
extension of the exclusionary rule
evidence that is found illegally and leads them to find more evidence is also to not be used in court
the tree (source) is tainted, anything that grows from that (the fruit) is also tainted
US v Katz
a case where the supreme court ruled that the warrantless electronic surveillance of a public phone booth violated the 4th amendment
shifted the focus to whether a person’s privacy was violated
per se rule
legal principle in both antitrust and tort law
a certain action is automatically considered illegal or negligent without further inquiry
antitrust: agreements like price-fixing are deemed illegal from the start
tort law: “negligence per se” where violating a specific statute is automatically considered a breach of the duty of care
basically means that some things are SO obviously illegal that we don’t even bother arguing about them
US v katz: some types of police searches are always searches. they always are.
infernal comma
in english terms it is the final comma in a series of three or more items, placed immediately before the “and”
this can dramatically change the meaning and intent of a legal text, leading to significant financial and legal consequences
search hypos
hypotheticals
fictional legal scenarios used in law schools to test a student’s ability to apply legal rules to new facts
battle of the experts
the conflicting testimony of expert witnessing for opposing sides of the trial
common in fields like medical malpractice, construction, divorce, etc.
complex issues
the court must often act as a gatekeeper, using legal standards to determine if the expert’s testimony is reliable
5th amendment
protects individuals from government overreach such as self-incrimination (right to remain silent), double jeopardy, etc.
due process: the government must follow fair legal procedures before taking a persons life, liberty, or property
cruel trilemma
a defendant would have 3 choices: confess, lie, stay silent — without the 5th amendment
miranda rights
expands the 5th amendment rights outside the court
for miranda rights to occur: the person must be custody and interrogated
they can not be coereced.
6th amendment
quick and public trial
1974: time period thought of 100 days
trial can be dropped if it goes on too long
impartial jury
right to be confronted by witnesses — no secret ones though
right to an attorney with any case that could end up in prison
8th amendment
cruel and unusual punishment
moratorian means that death penalty is allowed but no execution
serious racial disparities: members of minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty