1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Define Piaget’s stages of intellectual development
Piaget’s theory that we develop our intellectual abilities through going sequentially through 4 stages
Each stage is characterised by different levels of reasoning abilities
What are the four stages of intellectual development and their ages?
Sensorimotor Stage (0-2 years)
Pre-operational Stage (2-7 years)
Concrete Operational Stage (7-11 years)
Formal Operational Stage (11+ years)
Give the 4 key features of the sensorimotor stage
Focus on physical sensations
Develop basic co-ordination of physical actions
Understand other people as separate objects
Object permanence
What is object permanance and at what age does it develop?
Ability to realise object still exists when out of sight
8 months
How did Piaget test for object permanence?
Observing infants' reactions when an object was presented and then was covered with a blanket or removed from sight
Infants that had not yet developed object permanence appeared confused/lost interest and did not search for object
Infants that had developed object permanence reached out for object
What are the 2 key characteristics of the pre-operational stage?
Language and mobility
Lacks reasoning so makes characteristic reasoning errors
What are the 3 areas that children in the pre-operational stage characteristic reasoning stage make errors in?
Conservation
Egocentrism
Class-inclusion
What is conservation?
Mathematical understanding that quantity remains the same even when the appearance of the object changes
Give two examples of how Piaget tested for conservation abilities
Liquid conservation
Children without conservation abilities could not understand that there was the same volume of liquid in 2 glasses (which were different sizes) where the height of one liquid was greater than another
Area conservation
Children without conservation abilities could not understand that there was the same number of pennies on each row if on one row the pennies were more spread out
What is egocentrism?
The inability to see the world from another person’s point of view
How did Piaget and Inhelder test for egocentrism?
Child sits on one side of table opposite doll
Model mountains on table
Child must describe what they see
Child swaps seats with doll
Child is asked to describe what the doll can see from its perspective
In Piaget and Inhelder’s study child described what they could see themselves, rather than what the doll could see from its perspective
What is class-inclusion?
The ability to recognise that classes of objects have subcategories
Give one way Piaget and Inhelder tested for class-inclusion in pre-operational stage children
Asked 7-8 year olds if there was “More dogs or animals?” in a photo of 5 dogs and 2 cats
What are the 3 key characteristics of the concrete operational stage?
Ability to perform conservation and class-inclusion tasks
Improved reasoning abilities when externally verifiable (physical evidence)
Still struggle with abstract ideas/imagining objects and situations they cannot see
What are the 3 key characteristics of the formal operational stage?
Becoming capable of formal reasoning
Reason through things in a scientific way and test out hypotheses
Reason through abstract ideas
What contradictory research is there for object permanence? Why is this important?
Bower and Wishart (1972)
Findings: Infants aged 1 to 4 months continued to reach for an object for up to 90 seconds after the lights turned out
Importance: Baby may have been distracted by the cloth in Piaget’s study, making findings unreliable. Therefore object permanence occurs at a much younger age than Piaget theorised
What contradictory research is there for conservation? Why is this important?
McGarrigle and Donaldson
Procedure: Replicated conservation with an extra condition where a “naughty teddy” came in and moved counters by accident
Findings: 72% gave correct answer, showing they did have conservation abilities. When researcher moved counters themselves, most children answered incorrectly
Importance: Shows impact of researcher bias
Children assumed researcher wouldn’t ask unless they had changed something
So it was the way of questioning, not the conservation task, that led to children’s incorrect answer
Suggests Piaget’s age of conservation is incorrect
What contradictory research is there for egocentrism? Why is this important?
Hughes (1975)
Procedure: Used similar task to mountain study. Used 3 intersecting walls, a boy and two police officers (more real-life)
Findings:
Once familiar with task children aged 3.5 were able to put boy in position out of sight from police officer 90% of the time
Children aged 4 were able to put boy in position out of sight from both police officers 90% of the time
Importance: Able to de-centre much earlier than Piaget found
What contradictory research is there for class inclusion? Why is this important?
Siegler and Svetina
Procedure
100 5-year olds from Slovenia tested on 10-inclusion tasks with explanation after each session
Condition 1: told there are more animals than dogs in the photo because there are 7 animals but 5 dogs
Condition 2: told there are more animals than dogs in the photo because dogs are a sub-catergory of animals (true explanation)
Findings: Scores improved significantly more for condition 2 → Due to children in this condition showing real understanding of class inclusion
Importance: Under 7 year olds can understand class inclusion, suggestion Piaget’s method of measuring class inclusion lacks validity as he overestimated the age of class inclusion
How could you counteract the criticism of several aspects of the pre-operational stage having contradictory research? Why is this important?
The core principle of the pre-operational stage are unchallenged → Just incorrect methodology which led to Piaget finding incorrect age at which children develop abilities
How might we explain Piaget seemingly getting the ages of each stage wrong? How could this me countered?
Used small, highly-intelligent sample of his and other professor’s children → Likely to gain abilities earlier
Sample led Piaget to underestimate ages abilities develop → If children are more intelligent than average should have found overestimates
How did Piaget get it wrong regarding domain-specific vs domain-general cognitive development?
Domain general: Piaget saw intellectual development as a singular process: all aspects of cognition develop at the same time (language, reasoning, egocentrism)
However people with autism may develop these abilities separately which is “domain-specific” and have deficits in one area