1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
CAFOs/feedlots
densely crowded method where animals are fed grain to raise them ASAP
CAFO/feedlot benefits
maximizes land use and profit, minimizes cost of meat for consumers
CAFO/feedlot negatives
given antibiotics and growth hormones (→antibiotic resistance), large volume of waste →contaminated water, produce lots of CO2, CH4 (methane), and N2O (all GHG)
pharmaceuticals
hormones to beef up livestock and increase milk supply for cow
pharmaceutical benefit
fewer livestock requires to produce milk/meat
pharmaceutical drawback
contribute to an increase in antibiotic resistant strains of microorganisms that affect humans, possible interference with natural hormone function in humans
manure lagoons
large, open storage pits for animal waste (manure)
manure lagoons waste contain
ammonia (N →eutrophication), hormones + antibiotics (→alter endocrine of humans), e. coli/fecal coliform bacteria (→toxic to humans)
manure Lagoons effects
heavy rain can flood lagoons and contaminate nearby water with runoff, denitrification of ammonia in manure produce n2o (powerful ghg), can be emptied and buried in landfills or turned into fertilizer pellets
free range grazing
animals graze on grass and grow at natural rate w/o growth hormones
free range grazing benefits
little need for antibiotics w/ dispersed pop, doesn’t need production of corn to feed, waste dispersed naturally (fertilizer rather than build lagoon), animals can graze on land too dry for most crop growth
free range grazing cons
requires more total land use, more expensive to consumer
overgrazing
remove vegetation →topsoil erosion, animals compact soil →decrease water holding capacity →erosion, desertification can occur
rotational grazing (good)
move animals periodically, prevent overgrazing, increase grass growth by distributing manure (natural fertilizer) and clipping grass back to size where growth is most rapid
consequences of over consuming meat
mostly developed countries, consumer more meat than they need to
commons exploited due to meat overconsumption
land use, water supply/quality, pharmaceutical use (antibiotics/hormones), atmosphere (GHG), soil quality
delaney clause
ban cancer causing additives in food (food dye, flavor, preservatives)
why reduce meat consumption
reduce land use, conserve water supply/quality, reduce antibiotic use/growth hormones, reduce CO2 methane + n20, improve soil quality, ethical concerns about animal treatment
producing meat for humans to eat is far less efficient than..
producing plants (in terms of energy, land, water use) bc for meat you have to produce for plants to feed animals + energy for animals