1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Define the bottom-up approach to offender profiling
Looking at factors of the individual crime scene (situation, specific person) to make conclusions
Use of systematic analysis of evidence collected at the crime scene to create a unique picture of the offender
Who developed the bottom-up approach and what did they aim to do?
David Canter → Aimed to make process of offending profiling much more scientific
Describe investigative Psychology as a type of bottom-up profiling.
A form of bottom-up profiling matching details from the crime scene with statistical analysis of typical offender behaviour patterns, based on psychological theory
What is meant by interpersonal coherence?
The principle that the way an offender behaves during a crime is consistent with how they behave in their everyday life
What is forensic awareness and how might this be important when identifying an offender?
Elements of the crime scene that the criminal has committed offences before and been caught
Helpful because:
Has criminal’s DNA
Helps narrow down suspects
Define Geographical profiling, and give the name of the person who developed it.
Kim Rossmo
A form of bottom-up profiling based on spatial consistency
An offender’s base and future offence locations can be inferred through the geographical location of previous crimes
What is meant by crime mapping?
Using information from the linked crime scenes to make inferences about the likely base of the offender
What is meant by centre of gravity?
An area containing the base of the offender and the next offending locations (jeopardy surface)
What is Canter’s Circle theory?
The theory that patterns of offending usually form a circle around the offenders residence
What is the difference between a marauder and a commuter?
Marauder → Commits crimes closer to their home base
Commuter → Likely to have travelled a distance away from their usual residence to commit crimes
Provide 3 strengths of the bottom up approach to offender profiling
Can also predict next crime (when using geographical profiling to identify the jeopardy surface), as well as identifying offender
More useful than the top-down approach
Can be used for a wider range of crimes than the top-down approach
More grounded in psychological theory
Uses a large sample to develop theory
Database of thousands of crimes
Confident about theory’s validity
Provide 2 limitations of the bottom up approach to offender profiling
Rachel Nickell case
Targeted innocent man, Colin Stagg, when using bottom-up approach
Didn’t identify actual offender (who was ruled out earlier for being too short), Robert Napper, until over 15 years later
Illustrates danger of over-reliance on investigative psychology as people do not always fit into patterns
Relies on accurate reporting of crimes
To effectively use geographical profiling, we need accurate information of all crimes committed
Police forces differ in their accuracy of reporting crimes and only 75% of crimes are reported in the first place
Investigative psychology uses data base of solved crimes → What if they were the ones that were easy to solve?
Compare the bottom up approach to the top down approach to offender profiling. Which one is better and why?
Bottom-up approach is more useful than the top-down approach
Can be used for a wider range of crimes than the top-down approach
More grounded in psychological theory