type
autobiographical
themes and emotions
humanity versus nature
cultural differences
begining
herbert is descriptive and factual about the life of the inuits for example discusssing the necesary minerals and vitamins recieved from the narwals blubber.The description begins in medias res (in the middle ofthe action), with two pods of narwhal returning to a fjord and the hunters dotted around in kayaks in the evening light. The writer then provides information regarding the narwhal and their importance to the people of the High Arctic, before returning to the observation ofthe hunt itself.
middle
she feels conflicted but she understand the necessity of hunting them as her heart leaps for both . Herbert reveals her mixed feelings in this piece of writing, recognising how crucial it was to the people to catch a narwhal in terms oftheir survival, but also wanting the narwhalto escape and survive.
end
she is resolute(makes up her mind) and knows that its still and absolute necessity. It is this dilemma that the passage ends with; Herbert raises both moral and environmental questions about the process of hunting for survival. ending with an argumentative tone.
language
“plumes of spray”, “catching the light in a spectral play of colour”, “glittering kingdom”, “the evening light was turning butter-gold”, “catching the soft billows of smoke”- (vivid imagery) this gives the feeling of a magical aura over Greenland.
“looking as if they were going to merge, but always slowly, methodically passing each other by.”
“Escaping” “dead of winter” gives a chilling tone to the extract. It introduces a dangerous atmosphere.
"The women clustered on the knoll of the lookout, binoculars pointing in every direction."- the use of the word “clustered” and the phrase “pointing in every direction” builds up tension and creates an unsettled atmosphere
The use of the words 'merge,' 'slowly' and methodically' give the sense of large slow and majestic movements, but also the long structure of this sentence and the use of longer words, broken up with commas also reflects the movements of the whales.
“my heart leapt for both hunter and narwhal”. The metaphor is used to describe the conflicting feelings she has for the hunter and the narwhal. She isn’t sure which side she’s on.
In my opinion, this anthology doesn’t engage the reader because the language used isn’t emotive or powerful. It doesn’t strike you and it doesn’t make you want to read on. Her opinions are mixed and although I agree with her, the anthology’s tone is flat as she doesn’t use much emotive language. The lack of pathos here has a monotone effect on the reader
structure
It is rigidly structured, each paragraph aimed at describing different things.
In the first paragraph, the writer focuses on place and setting. The writer is very descriptive and writes in the past tense. She makes the place sound magical for example she says“Catching the light in a spectral play”. This also gives the reader what it is like in Greenland. The phrase “butter-gold” not only conveys the light but indicates the wealth of beauty in Greenland. The paragraph ends in a sombre tone with “shifting light”. This intrigues the reader.
In the next paragraphs, she explains why the Inghuits need to hunt narwhals to survive. She explains how the narwhal “is an essential contributor to the survival of the hunters in the High Arctic.” It is a detailed explanation with a factual tone. This paragraph lacks emotion.
The next paragraph includes lots of emotive language. The word “clustered” is a very powerful word as it describes all the women huddled together, to give themselves a feeling of protection as they watch their husbands in perilous danger. They not only want their husbands alive but they need the food as shown by the gasps. The writer describes it as a “vast water-borne game” although they are playing with lives, and says that the hunters are “spread like a net” which makes use of irony, as a method of catching something is to trap it in a net.
The next paragraph is when the writer sees the beauty of the narwhals and is split between the side of the hunters and the narwhals, as shown by the quote “in that split-second my heart leapt for both hunter and narwhal.” In the build-up to this, she creates tension, with the mention of the stillness and the pause after “picked up his harpoon and aimed.” This tension makes the hunter choose between the hunter and the narwhals. She then drops the tension instantly in the next paragraph, creating a breathing gap for the reader to think over the debate; hunter, or narwhal.
“looking as if they were going to merge, but always slowly, methodically passing each other by.” The use of the words 'merge,' 'slowly' and methodically' give the sense of large slow and majestic movements, but also the long structure of this sentence and the use of longer words, broken up with commas also reflects the movements of the whales.