1/83
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Patricia Hill Collins Time and Era
1948-present
Raised in Philadelphia in 1950s and 60s in the midst of racial tensions (desegregation, 1964 Race Riot)
Race Riot
August 28-30, 1964
Clash between police and black residents over allegations of police brutality
Rioting, looting, arson — 341 injuries, 774 arrests
Patricia Hill Collins Personal Life
Born in 1948 in Philly to working class parents
Father factory worker and veteran
Mother secretary
Attended schools that catered primarily to middle class white families, but then went to Girls’ High during desegregation in 1960s
Philadelphia High School for Girls - Nation’s first public high school for women only
Married Roger L. Collins (Prof. of Education); had a daughter named Valerie
Patricia Hill Collins Professional Life
Undergrad in Sociology at Brandeis University (1969), an MAT (Masters Degree of Arts and Teaching) at Harvard (1970), and a PhD in Sociology at Brandeis (1984)
Worked at Uni. of Cincinnati until accepting a position as a Distinguished Professor at the Uni. of Maryland
100th President of the American Sociological Association (ASA) in 2009
First African woman elected to position
Patricia Hill Collins Key Texts
Fighting Words
Black Sxual Politics
From Black Power to Hip Hop
Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory
Black Feminist Thought
Patricia Hill Collins Lesson 1
Knowledge is a product of where one is located in society; knowledge is positional
Being a Black woman creates a unique intersection of knowledge because of the outsider within position
Outsider Within
developed through Black women working in White families; they were “part of” the “in-ness” but were still outsiders because they were somewhat ignored and such, so although they were there they were still outsiders
“In spite of the obstacles that can confront outsiders within, such individuals can benefit from thai status”
Confront power hierarchies of disenfranchised groups, such as how they see themselves and how they are seen by the mainstream
Points to Simmel’s essay on the sociological significance of the stranger as a starting point
Hallmarks of the Outsider Within
Special Perspective of nearness and remoteness from power hierarchies, neutrality, objectivity (close in proximity but not actually part of the group)
Peculiar Ability to see oneself through the lens of the dominant group
Desire to Bring Greater Equality to the viewpoint of the outsiders so they are more visible to the gaze of insiders
Political or Social Justice Imperative to raise the consciousness of insiders to appreciate the undervalued experiences of outsiders
Georg Simmel
German Sociologist in late 1800s-early 1900s
‘The Stranger’ - part of work on sociology of space
Stranger = unique sociological category
The stranger is a member of the group in which he lives and participates and yet remains distant from other members of the group
Distance is emphasized more than nearness
Perceived as being in the group but not of the group
Eg. Snow White and the Seven Dwarves
Differentiates the stranger from the “outsider” who has no specific relation to a group and the “wanderer” who comes today and leaves tomorrow; stranger comes today and stays tomorrow
Confront power hierarchies of disenfranchised groups, such as how they see themselves and how they are seen by the mainstream
Have a more conscious awareness of themselves and of insiders, ,who are perceived to have power over the outsiders
Benefits of the Outsider Within
Simmel’s definition of objectivity: “a peculiar composition of nearness and remoteness, concern and indifference”
The tendency for people to confide in a “stranger” in ways they never would with each other
Black workers in White households; White people would tell them things that they wouldn’t necessarily tell the other White people
The ability of the stranger to see patterns that may be more difficult for those immersed in the situation to see
Patricia Hill Collins Lesson 2
Black feminist thought consists of ideas that are produced by Black women and that clarify a standpoint of and for Black women
There is NO ONE unified or correct form of Black feminist thought
There’s a rich history of knowledge transmission, often through an oral tradition of Black women in the roles of mothers, teachers, musicians, and preachers
This perspective involves challenging political knowledge validation processes that result in externally-defined stereotypical images of what it means to be a Black woman
Black Woman Stereotypes - Mammy, Jezebel, and Sapphire
Mammy - maid, heavy, taking care of family, no life of own, asexual, there to support, put aside own needs for White
Jezebel - oversexualized, power in body, influence over men
Sapphire - manipulative, sharp tongued, angry black women who doesn’t take anything from anybody (like the mom from Everybody Hates Chris)
Patricia Hill Collins Lesson 3
Race, gender, and class based oppression have long been recognized as linked forms of oppression in Black feminist thought
Rather than seeing race as being layered on top of other forms of oppression, Black feminist thought challenges us to rethink how systems of oppression interact dynamically
“The oppression experienced by most Black women is shaped by their subordinate status in an array of either/or dualities”
Why does Black Feminist Thought challenge us to see intersections of oppression?
Each gains its (limited) meaning relationally to the other/opposite part
Difference is not complementary; the halves do not enhance one another
These relationships are intrinsically unstable
Patricia Hill Collins Lesson 4
Black feminist approaches place emphasis on the role of historically-specific political economies in explaining the endurance of cultural themes
There is no monolithic Black women’s culture, but rather socially constructed cultureS (plural)
Black women’s culture provides an ideological framework of symbols and values (like self-definition and self-valuation) that assist Black women in seeing how race, class, and gender shape oppression
Why is Black women’s culture significant?
Data suggests that the relationship between oppressed people’s consciousness of oppression and the actions they take in dealing with oppressive structures may be far more complex than that suggested by existing social theory
It points to the problematic nature of existing conceptualizations of the term ‘activism’ as traditional acts like voting and participating in collective action
An analytical model exploring the relationship between oppression, consciousness, and activism is implicit in the way Black feminists have studied Black women’s culture
What does Black Feminist knowledge add to society?
Standpoints that are distinct and potentially opposed to white male insiders
A challenge to take for granted assumptions and concepts (dismantling the canon)
Research and knowledge about the lives and experiences of Black women that are authentic
Michel Foucault Time and Era
1926-1984
Born in France shortly after WWI
He lived there through the Great Depression and WWII
Lived in Sweden, Poland, and West Germany from 1955 until 1960. Nations were rebuilding and seeing economic growth
Moved to the United States in 1960 to work in California, New York, and Vermont - politically charged time in the US
Michel Foucault Personal Life
Born to upper-middle class family
Medical family
Contentious relationship with his father, largely related to his sexuality (GAY)
Attempted suicide in 1948 and was hospitalized in a psychiatric facility — shaped academic interests
Long-time partner, Daniel Defert, from 1963 to Foucault's death in 1984
Died of AIDs complications
Michel Foucault Professional Life
Attended Ecole Normale Superior (ENS), elite French secondary school (Durkheim also went there) and completed advanced studies in the Philosophy of Psychology
Well-versed in a range of disciplines and theorists, including Durkheim, Freud, and Marx (whom he rejected!)
Disagreed with class focus because of his own experiences with homophobia and antisemitism
Held professorships and lectureships around the world — highly regarded speaker
Michel Foucault Books
Discipline and Punish
The History of Sxuality (most well known)
Madness and Civilization
Power/Knowledge
Penality
the particular system of investigation and punishment that a society uses. Penality includes all aspects of the examination and treatment of those who break the law
Michel Foucault Lesson 1
Historically, punishment was enacted in public and against the body
Begins with a description of torture as a form of punishment
Begins by detailing the public execution of Damiens in 1757 and comparing it to prison rules from 1837
Reasoning: Highlights the different ways society has approached the act of punishment and to highlight the role of the body
Traces the shifts beginning with punishment that is public and against the body (emphasis on pain)
Punishment then became a dual system:
Administrative — courts lay out and determine punishment
Reform the Soul — relegated to prisons, punishments carried out in private
No longer about punishment against the body, but supervision of the individual and an effort to reform the soul
Dual System of Punishment
Administrative — courts lay out and determine punishment
Reform the Soul — relegated to prisons, punishments carried out in private
Michel Foucault Lesson 2
Punishment turns from a public spectacle into an administrative process that uses judges and courtrooms
In the court system there “operates a theoretical disavowal”
Judges can claim they do not pass sentences to punish but rather to correct, cure, and improve the person who committed the crime
Administering punishment became shameful, so the courts entrusted it to others “under the seal of secrecy”
“Punishment, then, will tend to become the most hidden part of the penal process”
Consequences of the shift to an administrative process with judges and courtrooms
Leaves the domain of everyday perception and enters that of abstract consciousness
Effectiveness is seen as resulting from its inevitability, not from its visible intensity
The certainty of being punished and not the horrifying spectacle of public punishment that must discourage crime
The exemplary mechanics of punishment changes its mechanisms
Juvenile Delinquents Act
1908
JDA assumed social environments were responsible for young peoples’ delinquent behaviour
The state took a parenting/teaching role rather than a punitive one — WELFARE MODEL!!!
As young as 7
Criticisms
Informal system; no lawyers or jury
Not uniform; indeterminate sentence lengths
Interpreted by provinces; not consistent across Canada
Young Offenders Act
1984
Following 1982 Charter, JDA was replaced with YOA (1984)
Moved away from welfare model towards a more standardized law and order approach
12-17 years
Two primary changes; portrayal of young people as dangerous to society, and the ability to hold young people accountable for their criminal behaviour
Biggest critics were police officers and victim’s rights groups
Police — too soft on crime
Victim’s rights — too hard on crime
“Hot topics” in YOA
Parents no longer held accountable
Minimum age raised from 7 to 12
Those under 12 couldn’t be held responsible for their actions in a criminal sense
Sentences set at no more than 10 years
Ban on publication of offender names
Youth provided lawyers in the process
Youth Criminal Justice Act
2003
Instituted based on the idea of proportionality — sentences should reflect the severity of the crime committed
In response to high youth incarceration rate from YOA
Introduction of diversion — Extrajudicial Measures!!!
Attempt to keep youth out of the system
Do community service instead of jail time
Criticised for being bifurcated and resembling the adult system
Bifurcated = dual system — some get the leniency, others don’t
Michel Foucault Lesson 3
Modern punishment occurs in a double system with bureaucratic concealment of the penalty
The court determines the punishment, but the prison actually carries it out
Justice no longer takes public responsibility for the violence that it enacts on the criminal offender
Alcatraz
Between 1932 and 1963, approx. 1570 men served time there
Average at any time was between 270-280 people
Most were in B and C block (general population)
Average 250 at a time
B and C block had 60 cells each in 3 tiers for a total of 360 cells
D block
Isolation for most violent or dangerous offenders
Only let out for a little bit of exercise and to shower
Guards always oversee prisoners
Experienced guards were transferred in
3:1 inmates to guards
Entry level salary $1860 a year (like $35,000 today)
1940s metal detectors virtually unknown — Alcatraz had them
Most members of the public were not even aware of their existence
Cells 5x9 feet, had steel strap bunk fixed to wall, mattress, 2 blankets, 1 pillow, small folding table and seat, sink/toilet, no privacy
Inmates with maximum privilege still spent an average of 15-16 hours a day in their cell
Had an inmate orchestra, regular movie screenings, a library, and sports
Michel Foucault Lesson 4
In the modern day, punishment is not about causing pain to the body
The body is what is imprisoned, but the intent is to remove the prisoner’s sense of freedom and liberty
Modern punishment is enacted on the person’s soul
Foucault says we could argue that imprisonment punishes the body, but not in the same way torture used to
Manipulation of the body comes at a distance through laws and strict rules within the prison, not actual infliction of pain
Penitentiary
A prison that does more than merely deprive people of their freedom. The combination of workshop, hospital, and prison is the defining feature of the modern prison system for Foucault
Marx and Engels Time and Era
Lived in various locations across Europe in the 1800s
Born in period immediately following French Revolution, lived during the Industrial Revolution
Society was characterized by massive social, political, and economic change
Karl Marx Personal Life
1818-1883
Born in Prussia (now Germany) to a family of Jewish Rabbis (converted to something else to avoid antisemitism before his birth)
Home-schooled by his father until entering university in 1935 at 17
Married baroness Jenny von Westphalen in 1843; had 7 children (4 Jenny’s, Edgar, Henry, and 1 unnamed); only 3 lived to adulthood (because of poor health conditions of the time)
Moved frequently for political reasons and eventually became a stateless person until his death
Buried, has grave site, regularly visited, defaced, and damaged
Friedrich Engels Personal Life
1820-1895
Born to a wealthy family who owned large cotton-textile mills in Prussia. Rejected but later joined the company and became a partner (so that he could support himself and Marx and their writing financially)
Long time partner Mary Burns, died in 1863. Become close with her sister, Lixxie, and married her hours before her death in 1878
Pro monogamy, against marriage
Died of throat cancer in 1895 at 74
Cremated, ashes scattered
Left his wealth to Marx’s 3 surviving daughters after he died
Marx & Engels Professional Life
Friends and collaborators who met in August 1844
Engels approached Marx and showed him his work; was able to convince him that the working class would be the agent and instrument of the final revolution in history
A year later Engels moved to Brussels to join Marx and they both went to England to visit leaders in the local socialist movement
Both wrote extensively; after Marx’s death, Engels continued to edit and publish their work
Marx & Engels Books
The Communist Manifesto
The German Ideology
Das Kapital (Marx)
Volumes 2/3 by Engels after Marx’s death
The Condition of the Working Class in England (Engels)
Marx & Engels Lesson 1
Society has undergone changes throughout history, based on the means of production
Can understand society at any given time by looking at how money and resources are distributed
Marx & Engels Two Questions
Who works?
Who benefits?
Marx & Engels Three Aspects of Social Organization
Material Forces of Production — actual methods by which people produce their livings
Relations of Production arise out of material forces or production and include properly relations and rights
Legal and Political Superstructures and the ideas of forms of social consciousness that correspond to the first two
What is the fundamental determinant of social structure according to Marx and Engels
Economic factors
Hunter-Gatherers
Small groups of extended families who roamed while hunting for meat and gathering fruits and vegetables; resources were distributed according to need
Would only settle in one place if resources were abundant. This settlement contributed to early starts of the Agricultural Revolution
Agricultural Revolution
18th and early 19th centuries people became more stationary and began domesticating animals and growing crops
Farming began with simple tools, like sticks, and expanded to a trade economy over time
Industrial Revolution
Manufacturing changed from manual to machine production
People moved into factory jobs, where efficiency allowed for mass production of goods
Post-Industrial Information Age
In our modern world, those with the means to produce, store, and disseminate information hold power
The rapid increase in computers and virtual communication allows for global markets to develop
Historical Materialism
the approach to understanding society that explains social change and human ideas in terms of underlying changes in the mode of production or economy
Marx and Engels believed that societies grew and changed because different social classes struggled over control of the means of production
Marx and Engels Lesson 2
throughout history, societies have been characterized by a complicated arrangement of people into various orders. They called this a manifold gradation of social rank
Class Conflict in Modern Society
The modern society that replaced feudalism did not abolish class antagonisms — rather it established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones
Marx and Engels Class Definition
A class is made up of people who are alike in their relationship to property — they have none, or they have the same type
Bourgeoisie vs. Proletariat
Bourgeoisie: the class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labour
Proletariat: the class of modern wage labourers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labour power in order to live
Who creates changes?
Bourgeoisie
Bourgeoisie Conundrum
The wealthy (bourgeoisie) get more money the more they produce/sell
But the more a product is produces, the less value it has (logic of supply and demand)
What do the bourgeoisie do?
They find new products and/or new markets
Increased infrastructure allowed for further travel and interaction with new societies (colonization of America)
Commerce (buying and selling) is forced on new nations — “it compels all nations, on pain of extinction”
Marx and Engels Lesson 3
By collapsing the feudal classes into only two, the few bourgeoisie have set themselves up to be overthrown by the many proletariat
“What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable”
Prediction or call to action???
Proletariat as the Working Class
Live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital
“Owing to the extensive use of machinery, and to the division of labour, the work of proletarians has lost all individual character”
The worker becomes an appendage of the machine
He is only needed for simple, monotonous tasks
Lose the "charm of the workman”
Members of the working class are considered a commodity; they must sell themselves (their time, body, energy) in exchange for money
They only get a small fee in exchange for the wealth of profit they create — Employer makes the profit
Exploitation!
Exploitation
in Marxist theory is defined in terms of the labour theory of value, to denote the extraction of surplus value, or the difference between the value of what a worker receives in wages and that which is produced and appropriated by the capitalist
Davis-Moore Thesis
Argued (1945) that greater social roles should be rewarded more because some jobs are more valuable than others (and/or require more training)
Believed that rewarding more important work with higher levels of income, prestige, and power encouraged people to work harder and longer
Marx and Engels Prediction
The working class would take down the wealthy class
“The workers begin to form combination (Trades’ Unions) against the bourgeoisie; they club together in order to keep up the rates of wages”
“Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time”
Marx and Engels concluded that while all previous historical movement swerve in favour of the minority, the overthrowing of the bourgeoisie would be in the interest of the immense majority
In the end, they believed the bourgeoisie will be taken down largely by infighting and tensions among themselves
Marx and Engels Lesson 4
Did not write much about age, sex, gender, or ethnicity because they thought machines rendered bodies irrelevant
Jo Freeman Time and Era
Born in Georgia in 1945 and raised in Los Angeles. Still alive today
Influenced by social movements and political events around her
Arrested during the Bay Area Civil Rights Movement
Had a University President fired during the Berkeley Free Speech Movement
Worked for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Arrested twice; charged and acquitted once, charged and convicted once
Jo Freeman Personal Life
After being involved in Civil Rights and Student Rights movement, Freeman began to question the expectations placed on women in the 1960s
In 1967 she met a group of women, who formed the Westside group (named for Freeman’s apartment (where they met to have discussions and such)
Dedicated her life to activism and social change
Jo Freeman Professional Life
Politically active during her undergraduate degree in Political Science and wrote a thesis on civil disobedience
Began a graduate degree in Political Science at the University of Chicago and earned a PhD in 1973
Attended NYU School of Law and was admitted to the bar in 1983; still resides in New York
Jo Freeman Books
We will be Heard
At Berkley in the Sixties
Women: a Feminist Perspective
The Politics of Women’s Liberation
Social Movement
an organized group that acts consciously to promote or resist change through collective action; long lasting, organized, and with a specific goal/purpose in mind
More likely to develop in industrialized societies than in pre-industrial ones, where acceptance of the traditional beliefs and practices make such movements unlikely
People who participate in social movements typically lack power and other resources to bring about social change without engaging in collective action
Social movements are most likely to spring up when people come to see their personal troubles as public issues that cannot be solved without a collective response
David Aberle
Types of social movements
Alternative Social Movements
Limited change to specific individuals (eg. self improvement)
Reformative Social Movements
Limited change ine veryone (eg. MADD)
Redemptive Social Movements
Widespread change specific individuals (eg. scientology, conversion therapy)
Revolutionary Social Movements
Widespread change in everyone
Jo Freeman Lesson 1
while some social movements may persist over long periods of time, we may not have a keen understanding of their origins
Jo Freeman Lesson 2
for a social movement to take root — have long term stability — it must have a group of people who are already in communication with one another
Network
a web of social relationships that links one person with other people and through them, to additional people
Frequently networks connect people who share common interests but who otherwise might not identify and interact with one another
When is a Network Cooptable
Members share experiences and are receptive to the message
The network is not faced with structural or ideological barriers
Who is at the core of social movements and networks
Young people
Jo Freeman Lesson 3
if a cooptable communication network is not well-formed, then active efforts must be made to organize one by the people involved in creating the movement
What if no network exists?
If no network exists, Freeman says there must be (at minimum) emerging spontaneous groups that are acutely attuned to the issue
Need leaders and organizers
Leaders and Organizers in Social Movements
Leaders and organizers are not necessarily the same person. There tends to be a focus on the leader (face of the movement), but the organizer is more important because they operate behind the scenes
Jo Freeman Lesson 4
Lesson 4: if a cooptable network does already exist, all that is needed to create a social movement is a crisis
A crisis does not need to be a major one; it only needs to embody collective discontent
In logic terms: necessary, not sufficient
Civil Rights Movement
Communications Network: the church and black college
Crisis: Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat on the bus
Organizing Body: Dr. King was the public leader of the Montgomery Bus Boycott; E.D. Nixon and the Women’s Political Council organized it
Student Movement
Communications Network: National Student Association (NSA) on campus and conferences
Crisis: series of protest issues in 1960s (bans on speech, Vietnam War)
Organizing Body: NSA was the primary contact across campuses
Welfare Rights Movement
Communications Network: The National Welfare Rights Organization was co-founded by George Wiley
Crisis: no crisis, ongoing poverty
Organizing Body: Wiley linked together local recipient groups - national organizers found among former civil rights activists
Women’s Liberation Movement
Communications Network: “Older branch” more traditional, “younger branch” more radical
Crisis: Refusal of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to enforce the sex provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Organizing Body: Many leaders but no organizers in the early days
Stonewall Riots Case Study
North America in the early 1900s saw recurring medical and legal discourses of homosexuality; gay men and lesbian women were seen as being diseased, mentally ill, and/or criminal
During WWII, Nazis destroyed gay and lesbian literature, art, and culture including over 12,000 books and 35,000 pictures
There was especially harsh treatment and high death rates among gay and lesbian concentration camp prisoners
Post WWII cold war era equated being gay or lesbian with a communist
The Stonewall Inn: a bar frequented by gay and lesbian people. Frequently raided by police, but on this particularly hot summer night, a police raid led to a weekend-long riot (1969)
Freeman on Stonewall and LGBTQ Movement
Pre-Existing Cooptable Network?
Gay people
Organizer?
Not really needed; just word of mouth and phone through the network
Crisis?
Yes - the riot