A set of flashcards covering key concepts of the Judicial Branch and Civil Liberties as outlined in lecture notes.
Last updated 9:40 PM on 11/15/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
96 Terms
1
New cards
Explain the principle of judicial review and how it checks the power of other institutions and state governments
Courts, especially the Supreme Court, can declare laws or executive actions unconstitutional, ensuring Congress, the President, and state governments do not exceed their constitutional authority.
2
New cards
What foundation establishes the powers of the judicial branch and its independence
Article III of the Constitution sets forth the powers of the judicial branch and its independence from other branches and state governments.
3
New cards
What is the main point of Federalist No. 78
The judicial branch must be independent and life tenure ensures judges can uphold the Constitution without political pressure.
4
New cards
Constitutional courts
Established under Article III and include life-tenured judges.
5
New cards
Legislative courts
Created by Congress for specialized purposes and may have limited terms.
6
New cards
Jurisdiction
Authority of a court to hear a case.
7
New cards
Original jurisdiction
Court’s authority to hear a case first.
8
New cards
Appellate jurisdiction
Authority to review decisions of lower courts.
9
New cards
Dual sovereignty
Federal and state governments can both prosecute the same conduct under their own laws.
10
New cards
Exclusive jurisdiction
Only one court can hear a case.
11
New cards
Concurrent jurisdiction
Multiple courts can hear the same type of case.
12
New cards
Role of litmus tests in judicial nominations
Assess a nominee’s stance on key issues to predict future rulings.
13
New cards
Role of judicial philosophy in nominations
Guides how a nominee interprets the Constitution, affecting how they may rule on cases.
14
New cards
Influence of gender, race, scandals, filibuster, and politics on nominations
Shape Senate confirmation decisions and public perception of nominees.
15
New cards
Precedent
Legal decision that guides future cases with similar issues.
16
New cards
Stare decisis
Following established precedent to ensure legal consistency.
17
New cards
Role of US Attorneys
Prosecute federal crimes and represent the federal government in civil cases.
18
New cards
Role of Attorney General
Chief legal officer of the federal government, overseeing the Department of Justice.
19
New cards
Role of Solicitor General
Represents the federal government before the Supreme Court and decides which cases to appeal.
20
New cards
How ideological changes in the Supreme Court composition affect precedents
Shifts in ideology from presidential appointments can lead the Court to establish new precedents or overturn existing ones.
21
New cards
How the President and Congress can change unpopular Supreme Court decisions
The President can influence future appointments, Congress can pass legislation altering Court jurisdiction, and Constitutional amendments can override rulings.
22
New cards
Judicial Activism
Judges interpret the Constitution broadly to address social issues or create new policy, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education.
23
New cards
Judicial Restraint
Judges defer to elected branches and uphold existing laws unless clearly unconstitutional, e.g., upholding a law despite personal disagreement.
24
New cards
How other branches can limit the Supreme Court’s power
Congress can alter jurisdiction and funding, the President can enforce or ignore decisions, and Constitutional amendments can override rulings.
25
New cards
Functions of amicus curiae briefs
Provide additional information, expertise, or arguments to influence the court’s decision.
26
New cards
Majority Opinion
Official ruling and reasoning agreed upon by more than half the judges.
27
New cards
Dissenting Opinion
Written by judges who disagree with the majority, explaining their reasoning.
28
New cards
Concurring Opinion
Agrees with the majority outcome but offers different reasoning.
29
New cards
Writ of Certiorari
Order by the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s decision.
30
New cards
Standing
Legal right of a party to bring a case to court based on a direct, personal stake.
31
New cards
Rule of Four
Four Supreme Court justices must agree to grant a writ of certiorari.
32
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (Facts)
William Marbury sued for his judicial commission that had not been delivered.
33
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (Plaintiff Arguments)
Marbury argued he had a legal right to his commission and the court should enforce it.
34
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (Defendant Arguments)
Madison argued the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to enforce delivery.
35
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (Holding)
Established judicial review and declared part of the law unconstitutional.
36
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (Impact)
Established the Supreme Court’s authority to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.
37
New cards
Engel v. Vitale (Facts)
A New York school required students to recite a nondenominational prayer.
38
New cards
Engel v. Vitale (Holding)
Mandatory school prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
39
New cards
Engel v. Vitale (Impact)
Reinforced separation of church and state in public schools.
40
New cards
Wisconsin v. Yoder (Facts)
Amish parents refused to send children to public school beyond eighth grade.
41
New cards
Wisconsin v. Yoder (Holding)
Compelling Amish children to attend school past eighth grade violated their Free Exercise rights.
42
New cards
Wisconsin v. Yoder (Impact)
Affirmed protection of religious freedom over state educational requirements.
43
New cards
Tinker v. Des Moines (Facts)
Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended.
44
New cards
Tinker v. Des Moines (Holding)
Students have the right to symbolic speech at school unless it disrupts educational activities.
45
New cards
Tinker v. Des Moines (Impact)
Expanded First Amendment protections for students in public schools.
46
New cards
Schenck v. United States (Facts)
Schenck distributed anti-draft pamphlets during WWI.
47
New cards
Schenck v. United States (Holding)
Speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected by the First Amendment.
48
New cards
Schenck v. United States (Impact)
Established limits on free speech during times of national emergency.
49
New cards
New York Times Co. v. United States (Facts)
The government attempted to prevent publication of the Pentagon Papers.
50
New cards
New York Times Co. v. United States (Holding)
Prior restraint is unconstitutional except under extreme circumstances.
51
New cards
New York Times Co. v. United States (Impact)
Strengthened freedom of the press against government censorship.
52
New cards
Mapp v. Ohio (Facts)
Police entered Mapp’s home without a warrant and found obscene materials.
53
New cards
Mapp v. Ohio (Holding)
Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in state courts (exclusionary rule).
54
New cards
Mapp v. Ohio (Impact)
Applied the exclusionary rule to states, limiting unlawful searches.
55
New cards
Gideon v. Wainwright (Facts)
Gideon was denied a court-appointed attorney for a felony trial.
56
New cards
Gideon v. Wainwright (Holding)
Defendants have the right to counsel in state felony trials under the Sixth Amendment.
57
New cards
Gideon v. Wainwright (Impact)
Expanded the right to legal counsel for all criminal defendants.
58
New cards
Furman v. Georgia (Facts)
Furman was sentenced to death for accidental murder during a burglary.
59
New cards
Furman v. Georgia (Holding)
Death penalty, as applied, was arbitrary and unconstitutional.
60
New cards
Furman v. Georgia (Impact)
Temporarily halted the death penalty in the U.S., leading to revisions in capital punishment laws.
61
New cards
Gitlow v. New York (Facts)
Gitlow distributed a manifesto advocating socialism and was convicted under state law.
62
New cards
Gitlow v. New York (Holding)
States must respect free speech rights under the Fourteenth Amendment (selective incorporation).
63
New cards
Gitlow v. New York (Impact)
Applied First Amendment protections to state governments.
64
New cards
McDonald v. Chicago (Facts)
McDonald challenged a Chicago law banning handguns.
65
New cards
McDonald v. Chicago (Holding)
Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
66
New cards
McDonald v. Chicago (Impact)
Incorporated Second Amendment protections at the state level.
67
New cards
Miranda Rule
Individuals must be informed of their rights before police interrogation to protect the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
68
New cards
Roe v. Wade (Facts)
Roe challenged Texas laws criminalizing most abortions.
69
New cards
Roe v. Wade (Holding)
Women have a constitutional right to privacy that includes the right to choose an abortion.
70
New cards
Roe v. Wade (Impact)
Established a nationwide standard protecting abortion rights.
71
New cards
Brown v. Board of Education (Facts)
African-American children were denied access to segregated public schools.
72
New cards
Brown v. Board of Education (Holding)
Segregation in public schools is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.
73
New cards
Brown v. Board of Education (Impact)
Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson and ended legal school segregation.
74
New cards
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in public accommodations, employment, and education.
75
New cards
Title IX of the Education Amendments (1972)
Prohibited sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs and activities.
76
New cards
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Prohibited racial discrimination in voting, including literacy tests and poll taxes, and enforced minority voting rights.
77
New cards
Bakke v. California (Facts)
Bakke challenged a medical school’s affirmative action admissions policy.
78
New cards
Bakke v. California (Holding)
Racial quotas are unconstitutional, but race can be considered as one factor in admissions.
79
New cards
Bakke v. California (Impact)
Limited but upheld the use of affirmative action in higher education.
80
New cards
First Amendment
Protects freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition.
81
New cards
Second Amendment
Protects the right to keep and bear arms.
82
New cards
Fourth Amendment
Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
83
New cards
Fifth Amendment
Protects against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and guarantees due process.
84
New cards
Sixth Amendment
Guarantees the right to a speedy and public trial, impartial jury, and counsel.
85
New cards
Eighth Amendment
Prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail or fines.
86
New cards
Ninth Amendment
Rights not listed in the Constitution are retained by the people.
87
New cards
Tenth Amendment
Powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people.
88
New cards
Time, place, and manner regulations
Government can impose reasonable restrictions on the conditions of speech without restricting content.
89
New cards
Miller Test
Determines whether speech or material is obscene and unprotected by the First Amendment.
90
New cards
Prior restraint
Government action that prohibits speech or publication before it occurs, generally presumed unconstitutional.
91
New cards
Patriot Act
Expanded government surveillance and investigative powers to prevent terrorism, raising Fourth Amendment concerns.
92
New cards
Due Process
Government must respect all legal rights owed to a person, including fair procedures.
93
New cards
How constitutional provisions have supported social movements
The Constitution, via the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment, has been used to challenge discrimination and expand civil liberties, supporting movements like Civil Rights, Women’s Rights, and LGBT Rights.
94
New cards
Rational Basis
Laws must be reasonably related to a legitimate government interest.
95
New cards
Intermediate Scrutiny
Laws involving gender or legitimacy must serve an important government interest and be substantially related to it.
96
New cards
Strict Scrutiny
Laws affecting fundamental rights or involving suspect classifications must serve a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored.