Q1: Raskolnikov quote philosophical meaning
Raskolnikov is reflecting on human nature, questioning whether humanity is inherently corrupt or if people’s actions are shaped by their circumstances. He entertains the idea that societal barriers and injustices, rather than inherent evil, lead to moral failings
Q1: Raskolnikov quote connection to the story
Raskolnikov’s inner conflict between his belief in his “extraordinary man theory” and his guilt over the murder. Marmeladov’s actions highlight the human capacity for suffering and redemption, prompting Raskolnikov to reconsider his rigid philosophical stance.
Q2: Raskolnikov’s Article, his argument
Raskolnikov proposes that humanity is divided into ordinary and extraordinary people. Extraordinary individuals have the right to commit crimes if their actions benefit humanity or advance society. These individuals are above convention morality and law.
Q2: Raskolnikov’s article, connection to his murder
Raskolnikov uses this theory to justify killing Aliona, believing her death will elimate a “parasitic” person and free resources for others. However, his guilt and psychological unraveling suggest he cannot fully embody he extraordinary man.
Q3: Giving money, literal debt
Raskolnikov may refer to Marmeladov’s, Sonia’s father, whom he feels responsible for after witnessing his tragic death. Giving money to Katherine fulfills a moral obligation to help Marmeladov’s suffering family.
Q3: Symbolic debt
Raskolnikov could view this as a broader repayment to humanity for his crime, an attempt to balance the harm he caused by doing good.
Q3: Inner guilt
This action might reflect Raskolnikov’s attempt to alleviate his growing guilt over his crime by helping those who suffer more than he does.