1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Occupier owes DoC due to dangerous state of land if
Aware of danger and has reasonable grounds to believe it exists
Knows or has reasonable grounds to know someone is in vicinity of the danger
The danger may be one he is expected to guard against
Donoghue v Folkstone
D not liable as was no reasonable grounds to believe one would be in the vicinity of the danger
Scott v Associated British Ports
D not liable as C would have acted same with even with a barrier C would’ve acted the same way
O should offer protection if
He would take precautions himself
Danger is obvious
Common humanity
Badaccino v West Withering
D not liable after boy injured himself jumping off of a navigational beacon as it was an ‘obvious danger’
Breach of duty
C must prove D breached his duty by not taking reasonable care
Platt v Liverpool CC
D not liable as deemed impossible to guard against an determined minority
Warnings
Occupier may discharge duty by taking reasonable steps to warn people
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council
An example of warnings - signs prohibiting swimming
Defences
Contributory negligence
Consent - Ratcliff v McConnell
Excluding liability
the question whether D can exclude liability is not covered in the Act
Remedies
Damages but not for loss of property