1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
three traditional schools of international political economy
mercantilism, liberalism, marxism
mercantilism
argues that national power and wealth are largely connected—national power is derived from wealth, and wealth is needed to accumulate power, and that trade is the way to acquire that wealth
three tenants of mercantilism
national power needs economic strength as support
exports (X) > imports (M)
manufacturing, especially high tech manufacturing is the best form of production because high barriers to entry can lead to a mono/oligopoly for first entrants.
liberalism
argues that the purpose of economic activity is to enrich individuals, not the state’s power and that countries gain from trade no matter what.
tenants of liberalism
trade is always beneficial (not always equally beneficial though)
countries should produce what they have a comparative advantage in.
prefers a market-based system of resource allocation
priority of an individual’s welfare.
governments should solve market failures
marxism
critical theory of capitalism, argues that there is a natural tendency toward concentration of capital (wealthy elites/bourgeois), competition requires incr efficiency and capital stock, if profits fall or efficiency is low, capitalists reduce wage labor. argues that the state should be an agent
tenants of Marxism
Marxian (Cox) rationalist approach
key actors - social forces
transnational K
national K
established L
non-established L
how actors are formed? where in international production
what determines actors’ preferences? anticipated costs/benz of policy
role of ideas: shared notions of social relationships influence behaviors (material interests are not enough)
open economy politics (OEP) (Oately) rationalist approach
key actors - societal actors (depends)
classes
industries
firms
how actors are formed? where in international production
what determines actors’ preferences? anticipated costs/benz of policy (material interests)
role of ideas: cause-effect relationship
actors in open economy politics
Factors/classes – abundant factor favors liberalization, scarce factor opposes
Industry v. agriculture
Industries – export-oriented industries favor liberalization, import-competing ones oppose
Inter-industry trade (ADC – developing)
Individual firms – export-oriented firms favor liberalization, import-competing ones oppose
Intra-industry trade (ADC-ADC)
tenants of rationalist theory
interests are material
you act in the way that best realize your interest material
enablers of globalization
technological
telegraph
steam engine (trains and ships)
gov policy
trade liberalization
gold standard (made conversion easy)
implications for the modern global economy
colonialism, timing of industrial revs shaped the distribution of economic power
geography shaped economic activity
importance of technological change
source of econ development and inequality (high entry causes for those who fall behind)
adoption varies and affects development
importance of policy
Distrbution of anticipated costs/benefits shapes political mobilization, which shape policy – privilege some over others.
Governments are agents of integration, not just victims.
logic of collective action
free riding
made greater when there are more actors and/or individual stakes are low
implications
concentrated interests better organized than diffused interests
once organized mobilization in relatively easy
means of adressing
selective benefits
non material motivations
institutions
reflect power
designed to deliver particular ends (rational-choice institutionalism) (OEP)
over time diverge from constellation of powers (historical instituitonalism)
implications
rules of the game (OEP)
more profound
organized interests
position in intl production determines how affected by trade liberalization
winners and losers sorted according to?
factors/class - capital v labor (homo unskilled)
sector - export oriented v import competing industries and their skilled workers + unskilled workers
inter-industry trade ( between countries of diff levels of dev )
firms - export orient v import competing and their skilled workers
intra-industry trade (between countries w/ similar levels of development)
off-shoring and the return of class mobilization
logic of collective action affects groups capacity to mobilize
china shock
us lost estimate of 560k jobs to trade from 1999-2011
estimate of 10% in manufacturing (around 985k) and 2m lost in teh whole economy
concentrated pain
more than lost employment
stagnant wages
not only trade
tariffs
authority resides w congress
delegated to the executive - reciprocal trade negotiations
unilateral instruments
trade defense instruments - anti dumping and anti subsidy measures (___ Act of 1934)
safeguard measures (sec 201 of the Trade Act of 1974)
importer pays, meaning that domestic consumers pay more
justification
reshore manufacturing
reduce trade deficit
addressing unfair trade practices
raise revenue