Power
the ability to influence behavior and control outcomes
Wielding power is dependent on
power potential, which rests on resources that states have at their disposal
Types of resources
natural, tangible, intangible
natural resources
geography, natural resources, population
tangible resources
industrial development, level of infrastructure, characteristics of military
intangible resources
national image, public support, leadership
state
must have territorial base with geographically defined boundaries; a stable population must reside within its borders; population should owe allegiance to an effective government; other states must recognize this state diplomatically
nation
group of people who share a set of characteristics; common history, heritage, language, customs, etc.
credibility
both the ability and the incentive to act using a certain policy
diplomacy
states try to influence the behavior of other actors by bargaining, negotiating, taking a specific action or refraining from such an action, or appealing to the foreign public for support of a position
public diplomacy
targeting both foreign publics and elites, attempting to create an overall image that enhances a country’s ability to achieve its diplomatic objectives
track-two diplomacy
uses individuals outside the government to carry out negotiations
economic statecraft
using engagement and sanctions to try to influence other states
compellence
a state threatens to use force to try to get another state to do something or to undo an act it has undertaken
deterrence
tool in international relations that uses the threat of punishment to discourage an opponent from taking an unwanted action
organizational politics
emphasizes an organization’s standard operating procedures and processes
bureaucratic politics
members of the bureaucratic politics flow from the push and pull, or tug-of-war, mong these departments, groups, or individuals
pluralist model
focuses on the fact that societal groups may play very important roles in the foreign policies adopted by states. especially in noncrisis situations and on particular types of issues, often economic ones. captures decision-making processes involving these types of actors
societal groups
can mobilize the media and public opinion, lobby the govt agencies responsible for making decisions, influence the appropriate representative bodies, organize transnational networks of people with comparable interests, and make direct contacts with the highest governmental officials
the pluralist model is compatible with
liberal approaches
constructivists holds that
foreign policy decisions are based on two major factors
1. the country’s strategic culture
2. the leaders’ interpretation of the salient international norms
globalization’s effect on the state
undermines state sovereignty; interferes with state exercise of power; exacerbated by the rise of new media
transnational religious and ideological movements’ effect on the state
seek loyalty and commitment of individuals and groups beyond the state; change state behavior on a specific problem or issue
ethnonational movements effect on the state
seek own state; attempty to replace current government with one representing the interests of the movement
transnational crime’s effect on the state
challenges state authority
fragile states’ effect on the state
threatens lives of persons within states and security of other states in international system
globalization
growing integration of the world in terms of politics, economics, and culture
fragile states
inability to exercise a monopoly on the legitimate use of force within their territory, to make collective decisions because of the erosion of legitimate authority, to interact with other states in the international system, and/or to provide public services
national security
the ability of a state to protect its interests, secrets, and citizens from threats—both external and internal—that endanger it
war
involves organized, deliberate violance by an identifiable political authory. they are relatively more lethal than other forms of organized violence. both sides must have some real capacity to harm each other, although that capacity need not be equal on both sides.
interstate wars
wars between states
intrastate wars
wars that take place within a state
include a faction and a government fighting over control of territory (Boko Haram in Nigeria); rival groups fighting to establish a government to control a failed or gragile state, etc.
unconventional warfare
distinguished by a willingness to flout restrictions on legitimate targets of violence or refuse to accept the traditional outcomes of battles as an indicator of victory or defeat
nationalism
a sense of national consciousness placing primary emphasis on one’s own nation’s cultures and interests over those of other nations
guerrilla warfare
strategic innovation by Mao Zedong
civilians risk their lives to protest the guerrillas, who hide among them and who cannot easily be distinguished from ordinary civilians when not actually fighting
asymmetric conflict
conducted between parties of very unequal strength. the weaker party attempts to exploit the opponent’s weaknesses
terrorism
political in nature or intent. nonstate actors. targets are noncombatants, such as ordinary citizens, political figures, or bureaucrats.
often been called the strategy of the weak
cyberspace
the entire spectrum of networked information and communication systems and devices and now pervades all aspects of society, economics, and politics
cyberwarfare
refers to state actions taken to penetrate another state’s computers or networks for the purpose of causing damage or disruption
power transition theory
it is not only mismatched material power that tempts states to war, but also the anticipation of shifts in the relative balance of power
realists focus significant attention in their analyses of war on
characteristics of the international system
In the liberal perspective, democratic peace theory holds that
democracies rarely (if ever) go to war with other democracies
commercial peace theory
posits that states that are more interdependent, particularly through trade and investment, are less likely to go to war
Constructivists focus significant attention on the role of
identities in international relations
realism blames war on
anarchy of the international system, distribution of power in the system, power transitions
liberalism blames war on
lack of democratic institutions/values, lack of interdependence, lack of shared institutions
constructivism blames war on
aggressive state identities, divergent identities, possession of belligerent ideas
realists think that war is
a necessary condition of interstate politics
deterrence theory is
the idea that the threat of force can be used to convince a party to avoid a certain action
liberal theorists argue that
states seeking power, including economic power, will be led by self-interest into successively deeper and broader coopera tion with other states, even if at times that cooperation is punctuated by war
Do constructivists have a theoretical answer for how to prevent war?
No
international cooperation
exists when states adopt behavior that is consistent with the preferences of other states in order to achieve common objectives
problems with cooperation according to realists
relative gains
prisoners dilemma
prisoner’s dilemma
the story of 2 prisoners who are interrogated separately for an alleged crime
Neoliberals and realists agree that the international system is
anarchic
neoliberal institutionalists expect that states will
often cooperate, arguing that it is often in their self-interest to do so
economic interdependence
states rely on one another for goods and/or economic gain
transaction costs
cost of making an exchange
To explain cooperation,
Constructivists often point to the shared identity of democracies
The main difference between liberal and constructivist explanations for cooperation is that
constructivists view democracy as an identity, rather than a mere characteristic of states, as liberals view it
international law
consists of a body of rules and norms regulating interactions among states, between states and IGOs, and, in more limited cases, among IGOs, states, and individuals
international law comes from
customs and treaties
treaties
are explicitly written agreements among states that lay out rights and obligations
vertical enforcement
a legal process whereby one actor works to constrain the actions of another actor over which it has authority in order to secure its compli ance with the law
the way domestic law is enforced
horizontal enforcement
states secure compliance from other states
vertical enforcement (top-down)
An international institution with authority over a state secures compliance
European Court of Justice
vertical enforcement (bottom-up)
National and local courts can enforce international law
universal jurisdiction
states may claim jurisdiction if an individual’s conduct is sufficiently heinous to violate the laws of all states
Both realists and liberals agree that compliance relies generally on
states and their individual self-interest
Treaties are created in order to
uphold norms related to human rights, liberalization of trade, protection of the environment, and more
legitimate
supported logically and justifiably
jus ad bellum
laws on entering into war
jus in bello
laws on acceptable conduct during war
extradition
the process of delivering an individual from the territory of one state to another state for prosecution or to serve a sentence
Adam Smith
believed that human beings act in rational ways to maximize their self-interest
protectionism
policies that included high tariffs to protect the growth of the new nation’s manufacturers
mercantilism
build economic wealth as an instrument of state power
macroeconomic policies
fiscal and monetary policies
Fiscal policies
affect a government’s budget, including the level of govern ment spending and the tax rates
monetary policies
include increasing or decreasing the money supply, generally through manipulation of short-term interest rates
microeconomic policies
policies on regulation, subsidies, competition, and antitrust actions
Multinational corporations play a key role as engines of
economic growth, providing international finance and items to trade
World Bank
initially designed to facilitate reconstruction in post–World War II Europe
shifted its primary emphasis in the 50s from reconstruction to development
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
designed to provide stability in exchange rates
foreign direct investment (FDI)
construction of factories and investment in the facilities for extraction of natural resources by multinational corporations
comparative advantage
Because each state differs in its ability to produce specific products— because of differences in natural resource bases, labor force characteristics, and land values— each state should produce and export that which it can produce most efficiently and import goods that other states can produce more efficiently
BRICS consists of
Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa
collective good
available to all group members, regardless of individual contribution
involves interdependent activities and choices
Intergovernmental organizations
address major problems at each level of analysis
the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Civil Aviation Organization
States join IGOs to use them as
instruments of foreign policy
UN Security Council
kept small to facilitate swift decision making in response to threats to international peace and security
UN General Assembly
193 members; each state has one vote; members work in six functional committee
Debates any topic within Charter’s purview; admits states; elects members to special bodies
UN International Court of Justice
15 judges
Noncompulsory jurisdiction on cases brought by states and international organizations
traditional peacekeeping
multilateral institutions such as the United Nations seek to contain conflicts between two states through third- party military forces
NGOs often lack
material forms of power
To realists, NGOs are not
independent actors
Liberals are convinced that IGOs and NGOs
do matter in international politics
cultural relativism
the idea that some rights are culturally determined, and hence, that different rights are relevant in specific cultural settings
absolute gains
The total benefit an actor receives, regardless of what other actors gain or lose. are not comparative
humanitarian intervention
idea that military action by states or the international community may be necessary to alleviate massive violations of human rights