1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Key behavioural assumption of the Solow-Swan Model
Savings in each period is equal to a constant fraction (s) of output
In a closed economy, investment per period is equal to savings
Consumption, assuming the first two things, is equal to one minus the constant fraction of savings multiplied by output
Savings and consumption are not dynamic household decisions
Basic prediction: an economy should grow faster when it is far below its steady state and slower when it is close to steady state
Capital accumulation in terms of Aggregate production function
The net change in capital between two periods is equal to investment in that period less capital depreciation
Investment is equal to Aggregate production function multiplied by savings fraction
When investment is greater than depreciation, capital is increasing, etc.
Investment is a logarithmic function whereas depreciation is a line
Steady-State Capital K*, Output Y* and Consumption C*
Occurs when capital doesn’t change, or when the amount of investment is equal to the amount of depreciation
Using Cobb Douglas, K* increase when savings rate, productivity or Labour increases, and decreases when depreciation rate increases
Find steady state output with K*, find steady state consumption with Y*
Diminishing Returns to K implications — Transitional Dynamics
In the short-run, if capital is less than stead-state, the marginal product is relatively high and the economy grows, but at a decreasing rate, until it reaches zero
Permanent increase in savings rate shifts up the investment curve, exceeding depreciation upon impact, but over time diminishing returns set in and growth slows to zero
Increasing the savings rate increases the levels of capital and output in the long run but has no long run effect on growth (visual as a logarithmic shift)
Only a shift up in A allows more output at any given level of capital per worker
Labour-augmenting Productivity and effective worker
Assuming that total factor productivity reasons that with better technology/innovation, the labour force expands
We then get y and k, which are output and capital per effective worker
Intensive form of the production function gives use F(capital per effective worker, 1)
Capital accumulation per effective worker is given by the change in capital per effective worker multiplied by the growth of total factor productivity and labour, equal to savings rate multiplied by production function minus the depreciation and growth multiplied by capital per effective worker
effective investment > effective depreciation means capital per effective worker is increasing
steady state output and consumption per effective worker can then be found
Balanced Growth
steady state capital and output per effective worker are constant
when k=k*, aggregate capital and output grow at the same rate as effective labour (balanced growth path)
The long run growth rates of capital per worker and out per worker are equal to the total factor productivity growth rate
Convergence hypothesis
if growth rates slow when reaching steady state, poor economies should hypothetically catch up to rich economies in the Long Run
conditional convergence is what Solow-Swan predicts, or that only economies with the same parameters will have the same long run output per worker
Growth Accounting
Can infer productivity through observed input and output growths
Supposing alpha is a third
inferred productivity growth
MORE ON THIS PLAESE!?