Theoretical perspectives criminal justice Chap 1 and 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/38

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

39 Terms

1
New cards

The primary purpose of law and the CJ system is what

deterrence

2
New cards

In deterrence theory, punishment must meet 3 criteria

Must be Certain, Swift, and Severe

3
New cards

Certain

Punishment occurs every time a crime is committed (camera lights at intersection, dui checkpoints)

4
New cards

Swift

occur immediately after the crime is committed

5
New cards

Severe

just enough to overcome the possible benefits of the criminal act

6
New cards

Two types of deterrence

specific and general deterrence

7
New cards

specific deterrence

punishment given to a specific individual to deter that individual (punishing jeff to deter jeff)

8
New cards

general deterrence

punishing one individual to send message to general audience)

9
New cards

Classical criminology assumes that

individuals exercise free will and act rationally

10
New cards

free will ->

behavior is the result of a choice/decision

11
New cards

acting rationally ->

weighing the pleasure possibly received from an act against the possible pain from an act (pros and cons)

12
New cards

Theory

a framework that allows us to assign meaning to behavior

13
New cards

Theories do what

state a relationship between two or more concepts (such as crime and punishment)

14
New cards

Independent variable

the cause or pre-cursor, comes first

15
New cards

Dependant variable

the outcome, or what is being predicted

16
New cards

Crime is almost always the ______ variable

dependent variable

17
New cards

9 steps of evaluating theories

Logicial Consistency, Scope, Parsimony, Testability, Empirical Viability, Causality vs. Soft Determinism, Quality of Empirical Tests, Usefulness, Policy Implications

18
New cards

Deterrence theory: Empirical viability

Initially studied using the death penalty -> no effect, but by the 1970s, deterrence theory started to be applied to more general crimes

19
New cards

Any criminal justice policy based on punishment is based on what

it is based on deterrence

20
New cards

cross-sectional research

compares multiple segments of a population at a single time

21
New cards

cross-sectional research and deterrence

perceived risk and self reported offending are measured at the same time

22
New cards

longitudinal research

A research design in which the same individuals are followed over time and their development is repeatedly assessed.

23
New cards

longitudinal research and deterrence

finds support for an experiential effect not a deterrent effect

24
New cards

experiential effect

extent to which previous experience affects individuals' perceptions of how severe criminal punishment will be when deciding whether or not to offend again

25
New cards

emboldening effect

prior punishment is positively related to future offending

26
New cards

Inductive modifications

studies consistently find very weak, if any support for deterrence

27
New cards

Most important thing in criteria for crime reduction according to deterrence theory

Certainty, not severity

28
New cards

Rational Choice theory

An economic form of deterrence theory (people make rational calculations of cost/benefit

29
New cards

Rational choice theory applies to both ____ and _____

individual acts and criminal careers

30
New cards

rational choice theory can include

efforts and rewards v.s. likelihood and severity of punishment

31
New cards

Examples of severity used in deterrence theory

longer sentences, 3 strike rule, juvenile transfer, capital punishment, abolishing parole, boot camp

32
New cards

Routine activities theory

The view that victimization results from the interaction of three everyday factors: the availability of suitable targets, the lack of capable guardians, and the presence of motivated offenders

33
New cards

routine activities and empirical viability

research has primarily only examined targets and guardianship, limited support for theory

34
New cards

Policy implications for routine activities theory (real world application)

curfews, supervision, locks, lighting, alarms, visibility, guard dog (all attempt to create capable guardianship) CPTED

35
New cards

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)

Building environments that naturally reduce the possibility of crime often through architecture (increasing visibility, secure doors, 7/11 example)

36
New cards

Three obstacles to theory development

  1. Lacks a focus/core questions and thus cannot be a distinct discipline

  2. Criminal Justice is an applied vocation; thus inherently atheoretical

  3. Criminal Justice is an offshoot of established disciplines

37
New cards

a theory’s ___ increases with empirical testing and subsequent refinement

Relevance

38
New cards

Theories ____ empirical findings into assumptions about criminality

Organize

39
New cards

____ theories provide the justification for generalizing across situations

Relevant