1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
social psychology
people relate to others and how behavior influences in social situationsatti
attribution theory
explains someones behavior over traits or environment
fundamental attribution error
under-estimate situation and overestimates personal disposition
actor observer bias
blame situations for our actions but blame personality for others actions
attitude
set belief influencing behavior
dispositional attributions
behavior caused by internal personality; person is responsible for their success
situational attribution
behavior caused by external environment; reason for success is outside indv
prejudice
unjustifiable attitude towards group âprejudgementâ
stereotype
generalized belief about a group of people
discrimination
act negative towards the group â>negative emotions and beliefs
scapegoat theory
find someone to blame when something goes wrong
other race effect
recall ones own race from their face
ingroup
common identity
outgroup
percieved as different
ingroup bias
favor our own group
peripheral route
attitude change occurs through emotion, attract, superficial cue rather than logic
TEMPORARY ATTTITUDE CHANGE
central route persuasion
attitude change through thinking about facts, logic, and strong arguments.
LONG TERM ATTTIUDE CHANGE
compliance strategies
ways to get people to agree to request
foot in the door technique
first say yes to small things can lead to saying yes to something bigger
door in the face technique
unreasonable request means say yes to the next question
role
expectations about a social position
cognitive dissonance theory
people experience discomfort when conflicting beliefs, attitude and more motivated to reduce that discomfort
self fulfilling prophecy
expectation influences behavior, causing expectation to come true
just world phenomenon
believe world is just and people deserve what they get
homogeneity
uniform attitudes and how things are all alike
lowball technique
get someone to agree, change the terms
norms
understood rules for normal behavior
conformity
by solomon asch, adjust to the behavior to align with society.
suggestability and mimicry are important in this
normative social influence
influences result in desire to gain approval or avoid disapproval
informational social influence
influences result from willingness to accept opinons about reality
social facilitation
better performance on easy task, bad performance on hard task
social loafing
exert less effor towards common goal than when individual accountability
deindividuation
loss of self awareness and restraint in situations fostering arousal and anonymity
group polarization
beliefs we bring enhance with people with like beliefs
group think
desire for harmony overrides realistic appraisal of alternatives
culture
ideas, attitude, values shared by groups of people and passed along generations
consistency
how similarly the indv acts in the same situation over time
distinctiveness
how similar the situation is to others we have witnessed
consensus
how well others do in the same situation
display rules
how individuals may alter and manager their emotional expressions based on whom they are interacting with, and may vary across cultures
mere exposure effect
develop liking for someone or something because we are exposed to them often
reward theory of attraction
attracted to someone because you associate it with positive feelings
passionate love
physical attraction marked by loving feelings
companionate love
characterized by trust rather than intense passion
equity
relationship where people both receive benefits proportional to what they give
self disclosure
reveal intimate aspects of yourself
alturism
unselfish regard for welfare for others
bystander effect
tendency to not give aid if other people are present
social exchange theory
social behavior is exchange process, max benefits and minimal costs
reciprocity norms
expectation that we should return help to those who helped them
social responsibility norms
expectation that we should help those who need help
conflict
incompatibility of action, goals, or ideas
social traps
2 parties caught in mutually destructive behavior, pursuing own self interest
mirror image perceptions
mutual view of conflicting parties, ethical and peaceful vs evil and aggressive
self fulfilling prophecies
belief leading to own fulfillment
superordinate goals
shared goals overriding differences in people and requires coooperation
grit
graduated and reciprocated initatives in tension reduction; decreases international tensions
diffusion of responsibility
people are less likely to take action because others are present
pluralistic ignorance
group disagress but assumes everything is fine, so everyone just goes with the group