Lecture 6 - Conformity

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/35

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:10 PM on 1/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

36 Terms

1
New cards

Define conformity. 

A change in our behaviour or beliefs in order to accord to others.

*an umbrella term for compliance and obedience 

2
New cards

Define compliance.

Publicly acting in accord, but privately disagreeing.

3
New cards

Define obedience.

Acting in accord due to being given a direct order.

4
New cards

Explain a study about how norms are formed?

Muzafer Sherif (1930s)

Sherif used an autokinetic phenomenon to observe how social norms emerge.

An autokinetic phenomenon is when you shine a laser in a dark room and the dot looks like it’s moving but its not.

Sherif found that in the first day, person 1 thought the dot moved 8 inches. Whereas, person 2 and 3 thought the dot moved much less. The scores of each person was visible to each participant and so, on the second day, all the scores started to conform to something similar, even though the dot still had not moved.

Therefore, just by being able to compare other’s answers, a norm of how much people saw the dot ‘move’ was formed.

<p><strong>Muzafer Sherif (1930s)</strong></p><p></p><p>Sherif used an autokinetic phenomenon to observe how social norms emerge.</p><p></p><p>An autokinetic phenomenon is when you shine a laser in a dark room and the dot looks like it’s moving but its not.</p><p></p><p>Sherif found that in the first day, person 1 thought the dot moved 8 inches. Whereas, person 2 and 3 thought the dot moved much less. The scores of each person was visible to each participant and so, on the second day, all the scores started to conform to something similar, even though the dot still had not moved.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, just by being able to compare other’s answers, a norm of how much people saw the dot ‘move’ was formed. </p>
5
New cards

What did Sherif’s experiment show about how social norms can emerge?

It highlighted the influence of others and how quickly comparison can cause social norms to form.

6
New cards

Explain a study about group influence?

Solomon Asch (1955)

A group of people were asked to say which lines they thought were closest to the standard line. Amongst the group were confederates who purposefully picked the wrong line. 

Asch did this because he wanted to know how group’s would influence people’s answers.

63% of the people in the group did not conform to what the confederates were saying, but the rest did conform. 

<p><strong>Solomon Asch (1955)</strong></p><p></p><p>A group of people were asked to say which lines they thought were closest to the standard line. Amongst the group were confederates who purposefully picked the wrong line.&nbsp;</p><p></p><p>Asch did this because he wanted to know how group’s would influence people’s answers. </p><p></p><p>63% of the people in the group did not conform to what the confederates were saying, but the rest <strong>did conform.&nbsp;</strong></p>
7
New cards

What did Asch’s experiment indicate about group influence?

It showed that we comply (doing it even though we don’t really believe in it) to ‘social norms’ set by the group in order to fit in and also because we start to doubt our own judgements. 

8
New cards

How does complying affect our beliefs?

The more we comply, the more we may start to believe what we are doing.

9
New cards

Explain a study about obedience. 

Stanley Milgrim 

Participants had to give out electric shocks to other participants as punishment for errors. Milgrim tested how obedient participants would be when administering the electric shocks that got progressively more intense and dangerous (participants could see the person’s reaction to the shocks—which got more and more intense).

Most participants (63%) fully complied with the experimenter’s demands even when they did not want to continue and when they saw the person being tortured. 

10
New cards

What did Milgrim’s experiment show about obedience?

It showed how strong our sense of obedience can be.

For example, Milgrim’s study was conducted at Stanford university which is a world-renowned university. Therefore, participants deemed the experiment and experimenters as credible, resulting in them to ‘blindly’ follow the instructions in spite of being uncomfortable with the tasks. 

<p>It showed how strong our sense of obedience can be.</p><p></p><p>For example, Milgrim’s study was conducted at Stanford university which is a world-renowned university. Therefore, participants deemed the experiment and experimenters as credible, resulting in them to&nbsp;‘blindly’ follow the instructions in spite of being uncomfortable with the tasks.&nbsp;</p>
11
New cards

What creates obedience?

  1. The victims distance from the participant

  2. The closeness and legitimacy of authority

  3. Institutional authority

  4. liberating effects of group influence

12
New cards

Why does the victims distance create obedience?

It is due to the depersonalisation effect.

For example, when participants could not see the people they were shocking, more complied because it wasn’t as personal.  However, when they could see/touch who they were shocking, it became much more personal, resulting in less complying. 

13
New cards

Why does the closeness and legitimacy of authority create obedience?

The closer the authority figures are, the more pressured people feel to listen and keep going. Contrastingly, when Milgrim gave instructions over the phone, obedience decreased and some lied about complying.

The authority figure must also seem legit to the participants which instills trust and influences the participant to be more obedient.

14
New cards

Why does institutional authority create obedience?

When an authority figure is legitimised by a formal organisation the commands were also legitimised. 

Therefore, making people more obedient to what they were told to do. 

15
New cards

Why does being in a group create obedience?

This is because it takes the responsibility off on the person, making them more obedient to whatever tasks they are told to do. 

16
New cards

What is a real-life example of norm formation?

When we start to appreciate a certain food only after hearing that others love it.

17
New cards

What is a real-life example of conformity?

When you laugh at a joke that you don’t find funny just because others are laughing. 

18
New cards

What is a real-life example of obedience?

When soldiers follow questionable orders just because they were told to do so.

19
New cards

What are the major themes learned from the 3 studies mentioned?

  1. Behaviour and attitude

  • when you have a very strong attitude you are less ‘malleable’ and less likely to conform

  1. Power and situation

  • when you are in a specific situation, you may easily conform because there are external pressures pushing you to do so 

  1. Shifting responsibility

  • when you are able to shift responsibility away from yourself it can help reduce any dissonance for acting in a way that’s different than how you would typically act. Therefore, making you more obedient or compliant.

20
New cards

What factors predict conformity?

  1. group size

  2. unanimity

  3. cohesion

  4. status

  5. public response

  6. no prior commitment

21
New cards

Explain a study that illustrates how group size affects conformity.

A researcher got people in the streets to look up at the sky. When 1 or 2 people were tasked to look up, not many people looked up. However, when 3 people were tasked to look up there was a greater a influence. 

Lastly, when 5 people were tasked to look up, 90% of people also looked up (after 5 people the influence remains about the same—it plateaus).

Therefore, suggesting that group size does affect the number of people who conform—5 people being the minimum group size to significantly influence people.

<p>A researcher got people in the streets to look up at the sky. When 1 or 2 people were tasked to look up, not many people looked up. However, when 3 people were tasked to look up there was a greater a influence.&nbsp;</p><p></p><p>Lastly, when 5 people were tasked to look up, 90% of people also looked up (after 5 people the influence remains about the same—it plateaus).</p><p></p><p>Therefore, suggesting that group size does affect the number of people who conform—5 people being the minimum group size to significantly influence people.</p>
22
New cards

How does group configuration affect conformity?

ie. group of 5 is split into a couple and a group of 3 friends,

The couple will be seen as a unit, so one person. Therefore, the group will be considered as 4 people and the effect won’t be as impactful if there were just 5 people.

Hence, the groups configuration can create an entirely new effect on people, in spite of the overall group still consisting of 5 people.

23
New cards

How does unanimity affect conformity?

If the choice is unanimous then everyone usually conforms. 

If at least one person disagrees then the likelihood of conforming drops by 25%.  

24
New cards

Why does 1 person disagreeing affect conformity that much?

This is because that disagreeing person ‘pops’ the pressure of the group influence and gives people the opportunity to come out of it and start thinking for themselves.

25
New cards

How does cohesion affect conformity?

The more tight-knit you are with the group, the more likely you will conform.

26
New cards

How does status affect conformity?

The higher someone’s status is in something related to what we are doing, the more likely we will conform to that person’s views.

27
New cards

How do public responses affect conformity?

If there is a big implication of not conforming, people will likely conform. And vice versa. 

28
New cards

How does having no prior commitments affect conformity?

The more committed one is to their belief, the less likely they are to conform.

29
New cards

Define normative influence.

When we conform to avoid rejection, stay in people’s good graces or gain their approval.

30
New cards

What can normative influence lead to? Why?

Public compliance—when you look like you agree on the outside, but on the inside you don’t.

This is because, in an effort to avoid rejection, we try to look like we agree even though we do not. 

31
New cards

Define informational influence. 

When you conform to others’ points of view, in order to be right in ambiguous situations. 

32
New cards

What do informational influences lead to? Why?

Private acceptance.

ie. when others sound confident about their answers we conform and agree with them in order to be right. This eventually leads to private acceptance.

33
New cards

When is personality a better predictor of our behaviour?

Our personality is a better predictor of behaviour when our social influences are weak.

34
New cards

Who conforms?

  1. gender (women more likely conform to men)

  2. social roles (police officer asks you to do something you’ll likely to conform)

35
New cards

Define reactance.

When we do the opposite of what other’s want us to do due to the motive to protect or restore one’s sense of freedom when we feel it is being compromised.

36
New cards

Define asserting uniqueness.

The preference to be moderately unique.

*to still be distinct but not entirely fit in

Explore top notes

Imperialism Rise in Nationalism • During the French and Industrial Revolution, nationalism continued to inspire nations to increase their political and economic power. • Nationalism became the ideal force in the political, economic, and cultural life in the world, becoming the first universal ideology-organizing all people into a nation state. Nationalism Defined • The strong belief that the interest of a particular nation-state is of primary importance. o Nation-State – a state where the vast majority shares the same culture and is conscious of it. It is an ideal in which cultural boundaries match up with political ones. • As an ideology, it is based on the idea that the individual’s loyalty and devotion to the nation-state surpass other individual/group interests. • Exalting one nation’s belief above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests, excluding the interests of others. Changing the World through a Nationalistic Vision • The French Revolution significantly changed the political world and how countries govern. • The Industrial Revolution significantly changed the economic world. • The Age of Imperialism (1870-1914) dramatically changed the political, economic, and social world. What is Imperialism? • Imperialism- The policy of extending the rule of authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies. Power and influence are done through diplomacy or military force. Reasons for Imperialism • There are 5 main motives for empires to seek to expand their rule over other countries or territories: 1. Exploratory • Imperial nations wanted to explore territory unknown to them. • The main purpose for this exploration of new lands was for resource acquisition, medical or scientific research. o Charles Darwin • Other reasons: o Cartography (map making) o Adventure 2. Ethnocentric • Europeans acted on the concept of ethnocentrism o Ethnocentrism- the belief that one race or nation is superior to others. • Ethnocentrism developed out of Charles Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory. Philosophers used the theory to explain why there were superior races and inferior races. o This became known as Social Darwinism. • Most imperial nations believed that their cultural values or beliefs were superior to other nations or groups. • Believed imperial conquest would bring successful culture to inferior people. 3. Religious • Imperial expansion promoted a religious movement of people setting out to convert new members of conquered territories. • With the belief that Christianity was superior, missionaries believed it was their duty to spread Christianity to the world. • Christian missionaries established churches, and in doing so, they spread Western culture values as well. • Typically, missionaries spread the imperial nation's language through education and religious interactions. 4. Political • Patriotism and Nationalism helped spur our imperial growth, thus creating competition against other supremacies. • It was a matter of national pride, respect, and security. • Furthermore, European rivalry spurred nations for imperial conquest. Since land equaled power, the more land a country could acquire the more prestige they could wield across the globe. • Empires wanted strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world. • The empire believed they must expand, thus they needed to be defended. 5. Economic • With the Industrial Revolution taking place during the same time, governments and private companies contributed to find ways to maximize profits. • Imperialized countries provided European factories and markets with natural resources (old and new) to manufacture products. • Trading posts were strategically placed around imperialized countries to maximize and increase profits. o Such places as the Suez Canal in Egypt which was controlled by the British provided strategic choke hold over many European powers. o Imperial powers competed over the best potential locations for resources, markets, and trade. History of Imperialism • Ancient Imperialism 600 BCE-500 CE o Roman Empire, Ancient China, Greek Empire, Persian Empire, Babylonian Empire. • Middle Age Imperialism (Age of Colonialism-1400-1800s) o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Netherlands (Dutch), Russia. • Age of Imperialism 1870-1914 o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Japan, United States, Ottoman Empire, Russia. • Current Imperialism...? o U.S. Military intervention (i.e. Middle East) o Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Imperialism Colonialism • Refers to political or economic control, either legally or illegally. • Refers to where one nation assumes control over the other. • Creating an empire, expanding into neighboring regions and expanding the dominance far outside its borders. • Where a country conquers and rules over other regions for exploiting resources from the conquered country for the conqueror's benefit. • Foreign government controls/governs a territory without significant settlement. • Foreign government controls/governs the territory from within the land being colonized. • Little to no new settlement established on fresh territory. • Movement to settle to fresh territory. Age of Colonialism WHEN? • Started around the late 1400s and ended around the late 1700s/early 1800s. WHY? • Primary Reason: European countries, wished to find a direct trade route to Asia (China & India) and the East Indies. o Quicker and relatively more effective than land routes over Asia. • Secondary Reason: Empire expansion (land power) WHO? • Countries involved: Great Britain, France, Spain, the Dutch & Portugal. • Individuals’ knowns as Mercantilists believed that maintaining imperialized territory and colonizing the region could serve as a source of wealth, while personal motives by rulers, explorers, and missionaries could therefore promote their own agenda. o This agenda being “Glory, God and Gold”. Mercantilism • Mercantilism was a popular and main economic system for many European nations during the 16th to 18th centuries. • The main goal was to increase a nation’s wealth by promoting government rule of a nation’s economy for the purpose of enhancing state power at the expense of rival national power. • It was the economic counterpart of political absolutism. Why did mercantilists want colonies? • Mercantilists believed that a country must have an excess of exports over imports. • By colonizing territory, it provided the nation with indispensable wealth of precious raw materials. • Therefore, the claimed territory served as a market and supplier of raw materials for the mother country. Which, in time, provided an excess of exports for the nation and thus created wealth. o Development of Trading Companies to support this economic system. Hudson Bay Company – (1670). Controlled primarily North America. o Dutch East Indie Trading Company (1682) o East Indian Trading Company (1600) o Royal African Trade Company (1672) WHERE? • European nations begun to colonize the America, India and the East Indies to create a direct trade route. • Great Britain was the leading power in India, Australia and North America, South Africa. • Spain colonized central and South America. • French held Louisiana, coastal land of Africa and French Guinea. • The Dutch built an empire in the East Indies. • The Portuguese was able to take control of present-day Brazil and the southern tip of South America and Japan. Age of Colonialism • As countries started to imperialize these regions, eventually the concept of colonization took hold: • This is what makes the Age of Colonialism extremely different! End of Colonialism • By 1800, colonialism became less popular • Why? o Revolutions (Spain, France & American) o The Napoleonic Wars o Struggle for nationalism and democracy. o Exhausted all money and energy to supervise their colonies. Waiting to wake again • Imperialism would stay quiet for close to 50 years before Great Britain and France’s economies revitalized. • The outbreak of the Industrial Revolution only encouraged and revitalized European nations to begin their conquest for new territory and resources. Age of Imperialism THE SCRAMBLE FOR AFRICA 1870-1914 Conditions Prior to Imperialism of Africa  European interest in exploiting Africa was minimal.  Their economic interests & profit in Africa primarily came through coastal trade that took place during the 1500-1700s.  The slave trade became the main source of European profit.  Furthermore, disease, political instability, lack of transportation and unpredictable climate all discouraged Europeans from seeking territory. Slave Trade & the Trans-Atlantic Slave Voyages  Forced labor was not uncommon during the 13-17th Centuries. Africans and Europeans had been trading goods and people across the Mediteranea for centuries.  This all changed from 1526 to 1867, as a new system of slavery was introduced that became highly “commercialized, racialized and inherited”  By 1690, the America and West Indies saw approximately 30,000 African people shipped from Africa. A century later, that number grew to 85,000 people per year.  By 1867, approximately 12.5 million people (about twice the population of Arizona) left Africa in a slave ship. What Changed? 1. End of the Slave Trade- Left a need for trade between Europe and Africa. 2. Innovation in technology- The steam engine and iron hulled boats allowed Europe 3. Discovery of new raw materials- Explorers located vast raw materials and resources and this only spurred imperialism with Europe in the wake of the Industrial Revolution. 4. Politics- Unification of Germany and Italy left little room to expand in Europe. Germany and Italy both needed raw materials to “catch up” with Britain and France so they looked to Africa. The Scramble for Africa  The scramble started in 1870.  Although some coastal land had previously been acquired before 1870, the need for territory quickly accelerated as European countries looked t get deeper into Africa.  Within 20 years, nearly all continents were placed under imperialistic rule. Who was Involved?  Great Britain  France  Germany  Italy  Portugal  Belgium  Spain (kind) Violent Affairs  Violence broke out multiple times when European nations looked to claim the same territory.  Germ Chancellor. Otto van Bismarck. Attempted to avert the possibility of violence against the European powers.  In 1884, Bismarck organized a conference in Berlin for the European nations. The Berlin Conference (1884-85)  The conference looked to set ground rules for future annexation of African territory by European Nations.  Annexation is the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over one state’s territory by another state, usually following military occupation of the territory.  From a distant perspective, it looked like it would reduce tensions among European nations and avert war.  At the heart of the meeting, these European countries negotiated their claims to African territory, made it official and then mapped their regions.  Furthermore, the leaders agreed to allow free trade among imperialized territory and some homework for negotiating future European claims in Africa was established. Further Path  After the conference, european powers continued to expand their claims in Africa so that by 1900. 90% of the African territory had been claimed. A Turn towards Colonization?  Upon the imperialization of African territory, European nations and little interest in African land unless it produced economic wealth.  Therefore, European governments put little effort and expertise into these imperialized regions.  In most cases, this emat a form of indirect rule. Thus, governing the natin without sufficient settlement and government from within the mother country. Some Exceptions  There were some exemptions through in Africa as colonization was a necessary for some regions i n Africa.  Some regions where diamonds and gold were present. Government looked to protectorate the regions and establish rule and settlement in the regions.  Protectorates: A state controlled and protected by another state for defense against aggression and other law violations. Would  Some examples include South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Congo. Conclusion  Although it may appear that the Berlin Conference averted war amid the African Scramble, imperialism eventually brought the world into worldwide conflict.  With the continued desire to create an empire by European nations. World War 1 would break out which can be linked to this quest at imperialism.
Updated 490d ago
note Note
Imperialism Rise in Nationalism • During the French and Industrial Revolution, nationalism continued to inspire nations to increase their political and economic power. • Nationalism became the ideal force in the political, economic, and cultural life in the world, becoming the first universal ideology-organizing all people into a nation state. Nationalism Defined • The strong belief that the interest of a particular nation-state is of primary importance. o Nation-State – a state where the vast majority shares the same culture and is conscious of it. It is an ideal in which cultural boundaries match up with political ones. • As an ideology, it is based on the idea that the individual’s loyalty and devotion to the nation-state surpass other individual/group interests. • Exalting one nation’s belief above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests, excluding the interests of others. Changing the World through a Nationalistic Vision • The French Revolution significantly changed the political world and how countries govern. • The Industrial Revolution significantly changed the economic world. • The Age of Imperialism (1870-1914) dramatically changed the political, economic, and social world. What is Imperialism? • Imperialism- The policy of extending the rule of authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies. Power and influence are done through diplomacy or military force. Reasons for Imperialism • There are 5 main motives for empires to seek to expand their rule over other countries or territories: 1. Exploratory • Imperial nations wanted to explore territory unknown to them. • The main purpose for this exploration of new lands was for resource acquisition, medical or scientific research. o Charles Darwin • Other reasons: o Cartography (map making) o Adventure 2. Ethnocentric • Europeans acted on the concept of ethnocentrism o Ethnocentrism- the belief that one race or nation is superior to others. • Ethnocentrism developed out of Charles Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory. Philosophers used the theory to explain why there were superior races and inferior races. o This became known as Social Darwinism. • Most imperial nations believed that their cultural values or beliefs were superior to other nations or groups. • Believed imperial conquest would bring successful culture to inferior people. 3. Religious • Imperial expansion promoted a religious movement of people setting out to convert new members of conquered territories. • With the belief that Christianity was superior, missionaries believed it was their duty to spread Christianity to the world. • Christian missionaries established churches, and in doing so, they spread Western culture values as well. • Typically, missionaries spread the imperial nation's language through education and religious interactions. 4. Political • Patriotism and Nationalism helped spur our imperial growth, thus creating competition against other supremacies. • It was a matter of national pride, respect, and security. • Furthermore, European rivalry spurred nations for imperial conquest. Since land equaled power, the more land a country could acquire the more prestige they could wield across the globe. • Empires wanted strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world. • The empire believed they must expand, thus they needed to be defended. 5. Economic • With the Industrial Revolution taking place during the same time, governments and private companies contributed to find ways to maximize profits. • Imperialized countries provided European factories and markets with natural resources (old and new) to manufacture products. • Trading posts were strategically placed around imperialized countries to maximize and increase profits. o Such places as the Suez Canal in Egypt which was controlled by the British provided strategic choke hold over many European powers. o Imperial powers competed over the best potential locations for resources, markets, and trade. History of Imperialism • Ancient Imperialism 600 BCE-500 CE o Roman Empire, Ancient China, Greek Empire, Persian Empire, Babylonian Empire. • Middle Age Imperialism (Age of Colonialism-1400-1800s) o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Netherlands (Dutch), Russia. • Age of Imperialism 1870-1914 o Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Japan, United States, Ottoman Empire, Russia. • Current Imperialism...? o U.S. Military intervention (i.e. Middle East) o Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Imperialism Colonialism • Refers to political or economic control, either legally or illegally. • Refers to where one nation assumes control over the other. • Creating an empire, expanding into neighboring regions and expanding the dominance far outside its borders. • Where a country conquers and rules over other regions for exploiting resources from the conquered country for the conqueror's benefit. • Foreign government controls/governs a territory without significant settlement. • Foreign government controls/governs the territory from within the land being colonized. • Little to no new settlement established on fresh territory. • Movement to settle to fresh territory. Age of Colonialism WHEN? • Started around the late 1400s and ended around the late 1700s/early 1800s. WHY? • Primary Reason: European countries, wished to find a direct trade route to Asia (China & India) and the East Indies. o Quicker and relatively more effective than land routes over Asia. • Secondary Reason: Empire expansion (land power) WHO? • Countries involved: Great Britain, France, Spain, the Dutch & Portugal. • Individuals’ knowns as Mercantilists believed that maintaining imperialized territory and colonizing the region could serve as a source of wealth, while personal motives by rulers, explorers, and missionaries could therefore promote their own agenda. o This agenda being “Glory, God and Gold”. Mercantilism • Mercantilism was a popular and main economic system for many European nations during the 16th to 18th centuries. • The main goal was to increase a nation’s wealth by promoting government rule of a nation’s economy for the purpose of enhancing state power at the expense of rival national power. • It was the economic counterpart of political absolutism. Why did mercantilists want colonies? • Mercantilists believed that a country must have an excess of exports over imports. • By colonizing territory, it provided the nation with indispensable wealth of precious raw materials. • Therefore, the claimed territory served as a market and supplier of raw materials for the mother country. Which, in time, provided an excess of exports for the nation and thus created wealth. o Development of Trading Companies to support this economic system. Hudson Bay Company – (1670). Controlled primarily North America. o Dutch East Indie Trading Company (1682) o East Indian Trading Company (1600) o Royal African Trade Company (1672) WHERE? • European nations begun to colonize the America, India and the East Indies to create a direct trade route. • Great Britain was the leading power in India, Australia and North America, South Africa. • Spain colonized central and South America. • French held Louisiana, coastal land of Africa and French Guinea. • The Dutch built an empire in the East Indies. • The Portuguese was able to take control of present-day Brazil and the southern tip of South America and Japan. Age of Colonialism • As countries started to imperialize these regions, eventually the concept of colonization took hold: • This is what makes the Age of Colonialism extremely different! End of Colonialism • By 1800, colonialism became less popular • Why? o Revolutions (Spain, France & American) o The Napoleonic Wars o Struggle for nationalism and democracy. o Exhausted all money and energy to supervise their colonies. Waiting to wake again • Imperialism would stay quiet for close to 50 years before Great Britain and France’s economies revitalized. • The outbreak of the Industrial Revolution only encouraged and revitalized European nations to begin their conquest for new territory and resources. Age of Imperialism THE SCRAMBLE FOR AFRICA 1870-1914 Conditions Prior to Imperialism of Africa  European interest in exploiting Africa was minimal.  Their economic interests & profit in Africa primarily came through coastal trade that took place during the 1500-1700s.  The slave trade became the main source of European profit.  Furthermore, disease, political instability, lack of transportation and unpredictable climate all discouraged Europeans from seeking territory. Slave Trade & the Trans-Atlantic Slave Voyages  Forced labor was not uncommon during the 13-17th Centuries. Africans and Europeans had been trading goods and people across the Mediteranea for centuries.  This all changed from 1526 to 1867, as a new system of slavery was introduced that became highly “commercialized, racialized and inherited”  By 1690, the America and West Indies saw approximately 30,000 African people shipped from Africa. A century later, that number grew to 85,000 people per year.  By 1867, approximately 12.5 million people (about twice the population of Arizona) left Africa in a slave ship. What Changed? 1. End of the Slave Trade- Left a need for trade between Europe and Africa. 2. Innovation in technology- The steam engine and iron hulled boats allowed Europe 3. Discovery of new raw materials- Explorers located vast raw materials and resources and this only spurred imperialism with Europe in the wake of the Industrial Revolution. 4. Politics- Unification of Germany and Italy left little room to expand in Europe. Germany and Italy both needed raw materials to “catch up” with Britain and France so they looked to Africa. The Scramble for Africa  The scramble started in 1870.  Although some coastal land had previously been acquired before 1870, the need for territory quickly accelerated as European countries looked t get deeper into Africa.  Within 20 years, nearly all continents were placed under imperialistic rule. Who was Involved?  Great Britain  France  Germany  Italy  Portugal  Belgium  Spain (kind) Violent Affairs  Violence broke out multiple times when European nations looked to claim the same territory.  Germ Chancellor. Otto van Bismarck. Attempted to avert the possibility of violence against the European powers.  In 1884, Bismarck organized a conference in Berlin for the European nations. The Berlin Conference (1884-85)  The conference looked to set ground rules for future annexation of African territory by European Nations.  Annexation is the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over one state’s territory by another state, usually following military occupation of the territory.  From a distant perspective, it looked like it would reduce tensions among European nations and avert war.  At the heart of the meeting, these European countries negotiated their claims to African territory, made it official and then mapped their regions.  Furthermore, the leaders agreed to allow free trade among imperialized territory and some homework for negotiating future European claims in Africa was established. Further Path  After the conference, european powers continued to expand their claims in Africa so that by 1900. 90% of the African territory had been claimed. A Turn towards Colonization?  Upon the imperialization of African territory, European nations and little interest in African land unless it produced economic wealth.  Therefore, European governments put little effort and expertise into these imperialized regions.  In most cases, this emat a form of indirect rule. Thus, governing the natin without sufficient settlement and government from within the mother country. Some Exceptions  There were some exemptions through in Africa as colonization was a necessary for some regions i n Africa.  Some regions where diamonds and gold were present. Government looked to protectorate the regions and establish rule and settlement in the regions.  Protectorates: A state controlled and protected by another state for defense against aggression and other law violations. Would  Some examples include South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Congo. Conclusion  Although it may appear that the Berlin Conference averted war amid the African Scramble, imperialism eventually brought the world into worldwide conflict.  With the continued desire to create an empire by European nations. World War 1 would break out which can be linked to this quest at imperialism.
Updated 490d ago
note Note

Explore top flashcards

Unit 5: Genetics
Updated 375d ago
flashcards Flashcards (29)
La familia
Updated 784d ago
flashcards Flashcards (38)
CMS III Final: EM
Updated 255d ago
flashcards Flashcards (212)
2b: Cell structure
Updated 1171d ago
flashcards Flashcards (30)
deelsteppen
Updated 1065d ago
flashcards Flashcards (87)
PSYC 14
Updated 148d ago
flashcards Flashcards (64)
Unit 5: Genetics
Updated 375d ago
flashcards Flashcards (29)
La familia
Updated 784d ago
flashcards Flashcards (38)
CMS III Final: EM
Updated 255d ago
flashcards Flashcards (212)
2b: Cell structure
Updated 1171d ago
flashcards Flashcards (30)
deelsteppen
Updated 1065d ago
flashcards Flashcards (87)
PSYC 14
Updated 148d ago
flashcards Flashcards (64)