1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Suicide
direct and willful destruction of one’s own life
Direct insofar
primary object of the act itself is the killing of oneself
Willful insofar
it is deliberate, voluntary, and intentional
Destructive insofar
means of terminating one’s own life is violent, brutal or very harsh
Misfortune and frustration in love or marriage.
Parental indifference or apathy towards one's boyfriend or girlfriend.
In-law problems.
Failure in an examination.
Loss of honor and integrity.
A nervous breakdown due to one's inability to cope with life's problems.
Personal Reasons of Suicide
Poverty and impoverishment
Great loss of money or collapse in a business venture.
Financial Causes of Suicide
Failed coup d'etat
Protest against man's inhumanity
to man.
Social and Political Causes
Socrates
Plato
Aristotle
Epicurus
Lucius Seneca
Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius
Philosophical Perspectives
Socrates
An individual was a property of the gods, so self-killing would bring about their anger.
The permission of the gods could be manifested in a “visible necessity of dying,”
any shame of extreme distress and
impoverishment
affliction by any extraordinary sorrow
inevitable turn of fortune
Plato’s 3 EXCEPTION TO PROHIBIT SUICIDE
Aristotle
Suicide as an act of cowardice and an
offense against the state.
Epicurus
If life ceases to be a pleasure or a
pleasant one, the recourse for a free
individual is to terminate it.
Lucius Seneca
Argued eloquently in favor of suicide as
an escape from suffering and the decay
of old age.
Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius
Both Stoic philosophers emphasized living (and dying) with virtue and honor.
They valued a death with dignity over a life marred by ignominy, seeing courage in facing death rather than succumbing to fear or shame.
Samson
King Saul
Judas Iscariot
Biblical Perspectives
Samson (Judges 16:23-31)
Chose to die with his enemies.
Die with dignity, avenging his foes rather than living in ignominy and darkness for the rest of his life
King Saul (1 Samuel 31:4-5)
Committed suicide on Mount Gilboa during the final battle.
Preferred death to falling into enemy hands, avoiding public humiliation.
Judas Iscariot (Matthew 27:5)
Took his own life by hanging, haunted by his betrayal of Jesus.
His death reflects a desire to escape the ignominy of his actions, thoughmorally and spiritually tragic.
Michel De Montiage
John Donne
Baron De Montesquieu
David Hume
PROS OF SUICIDE
Michel De Montiage
born on (1533-1592), a French essayist and skeptical philosopher, was the first to explicitly question the views of St. Augustine and Aquinas.
He argued that if and when an individual reaches a point where all that he/she feels is terrible pain, agony, and misery, then suicide becomes excusable, permissible.
In his view, one's fear of suffering that is worse than death itself is the most excusable incitement to self-killing
John Donne
born on (1573-1631), a British clergyman and a religious writer, criticized the Christian prohibition of suicide as self-serving for capitalists and Christian authorities who exploit and oppress their laborers.
The proscription of the Church, he explained, is merely a part of the economic enslavement of laborers.
Suicide, in his view, is a means of liberating oneself from exploitation and oppression.
Thus, the prohibition of suicide is a surreptitious way of preventing the masses from escaping the tasks expected of them by the prohibitors.
Baron De Montesquieu
born on (1689-1755), a philosopher and political theorist, also justified suicide by saying:
it is unjust to compel a person to labor for a society he/she no longer consents to be a member of-this justifies the act of terminating one's own life;
the act of suicide does not disturb the order of Providence, nor does any other human act alter the modifications of matter;
though the soul is separated from the body, the order or regularity in the universe never changes.
David Hume
(1711-1776)
a Scottish philosopher, defended suicide:
The removal of misery makes suicide morally justifiable and permissible; to bear unbearable pain is in no way part of a natural inclination;
Moral duty is reciprocal; while alive and healthy, it is one's bounden duty to render service to society, as it protects him/her in return, but when his/her life becomes a liability and a burden to society, his/her withdrawal is not only innocent but laudable;
There is no such thing as order designed by God; man's life is as disposable as that of an oyster.
Jewish and Christian Views (Flavius Josephus)
St. Augustine
St. Thomas Aquinas
THE CONS OF SUICIDE
Jewish and Christian Views
the earliest rejection of suicide is found in the teachings of Flavius Josephus (c. 37–100).
Teachings of Flavius Josephus
a commander of a defeated army, he argued against his soldiers’ desire to kill themselves to avoid shame.
he maintained that suicide goes against the natural instinct of self-preservation and violates God’s will, since the soul is entrusted to humans by God
St. Augustine
is a grave sin because it is greater than the sins it seeks to avoid, breaks the commandment “Thou shall not kill,” removes the opportunity for repentance, and represents an attempt to escape life’s hardships
St. Thomas Aquinas
presented a threefold argument:
suicide is against natural law and self-preservation,
harms society by depriving it of a member
and wrongly claims authority over a life that is ultimately God’s gift.
NATURAL LAW ETHICS
UTILITARIAN PERSPECTIVE
KANTIAN ETHICS
APPLICATION OF ETHICAL THEORIES
Natural Law Ethics
suicide is viewed as self-murder because life is a gift from God, and individuals are merely stewards, not owners, of their lives.
Since a person does not have dominion over his or her own life, taking it is considered morally wrong.
Utilitarian Perspective
However, suicide may be argued as justifiable if it reduces suffering or lessens the burden on others
appealing to the principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number—though this remains debatable
Kantian Ethics
suicide is generally rejected because it treats oneself merely as a means rather than as an end.
Yet some argue that Kant’s concept of autonomy and rational will can be interpreted to support the idea of choosing death with dignity under certain circumstances.