1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
p & q
TT T, TF F, FT F, FF, F (ALL F EXCEPT TT)
p v q
TT T, TF T, FT T, FF F (ALL T EXCEPT FF: being FRESH and FIT is FUN)
~p/~q
opposite of the given T/F. if T, then F vice versa
p —> q
TT T, TF F, FT T, FF T, (ALL T EXCEPT TF: TF???)
p ←→ q
TT T, TF F, FT F, FF T (MATCH UP)
if an argument p,q therefore r is valid, then (p&q) —> is
A TAUTOLOGY
if an argument p,q therefore r is INvalid, then (p&q) —> r is
A CONTINGENCY/CONTRADICTION
if p is a contradiction, then p,q therefore r is
VALID
if r is a tautology, then p, q therefore r is
VALID
if an argument p,q therefore r is valid, then (p&q)&~r is
A CONTRADICTION
if an argument p,q therefore r is invalid, then (p&q)&~r is
CONTINGENCY OR TAUTOLOGY