1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Basic assumptions that underlie behaviourism (principles of learning…)
-principles of learning should apply equally to different behaviours
-and a variety of animal species = equipotentiality
Basic assumptions that underlie behaviourism (learning processes…)
-learning processes can be studied objectively when the focus is on stimuli (S) and responses (R)
-behaviourism = S-R (response is a result of a stimulus)
Basic assumptions that underlie behaviourism (internal processes…)
-internal processes tend to be excluded or minimised in theoretical explanations
-learning involves a behaviour change
Basic assumptions that underlie behaviourism (organisms are born..)
-organisms are born as blank slates
-born without built-in mental content or pre-existing knowledge
-learning is the result of environmental events = conditioned
Basic principles that underlie behaviourism: The Parsimony Principle
-everyone equal
-the most concise explanation of a given phenomenon wins
Basic principles that underlie behaviourism: Law of Contiguity
-any events and behaviour connected in time and space will tend to be associated
-e.g. everyday your friend wears red but when they don’t you’re surprised
Basic principles that underlie behaviourism: Law of effect
-any behaviour which is followed by a favourable event is likely to be repeated, vice versa
-e.g. student gets good grade after trying a new study method so uses it again
Classical conditioning and Pavlov’s three step model —> from an NS to a CS
Before conditioning: UCS (food) causes UCR (saliva).
During conditioning (Acquisition): NS (bell) + UCS (food) causes UCR (saliva).
After conditioning: CS (bell) causes CR (salivation).
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Associative Bias
-some stimuli are more likely to form associations with each other
-food—>nausea : loudness—>fear
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Importance of Contingency
-contiguity is not enough
-the potential CS must come before the UCS
-must be a signal
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Generalisation (transfer)
-other stimuli that are similar to a conditioned stimulus may begin to obtain the response
-e.g. anxiety for a test = anxiety for every other test.
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Stimulus Discrimination (shaping)
-when ones stimulus (CS+) is presented with an UCS
-while another (CS-) is not
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Extinction
-repeated presentation of the CS without the UCS
-can lead to a weaker and weaker (CR)
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Spontaneous Recovery
-recurrence of a CR after a period of extinction
Common phenomena associated with classical conditioning: Higher-Order Conditioning
-occurs when a CS is paired with a new neutral stimulus, creating a second conditioned stimulus.
-e.g. a bell (CS) + food (UCS) to obtain salivation (CR)
-light + bell = light alone eventually obtains salivation.
Skinner’s three term contingency model —> ABC
-Antecedents (discriminative stimulus)
-Behaviour (response)
-Consequences (stimulus)
How classical and operant conditioning differ: Classical Conditioning
-S-R: Stimulus-Response
-associating two stimuli together
-in Pavlov’s dogs, the neutral stimulus (bell) is associated with a stimulus (food), leading to the same response (salivation)
-behaviour is triggered by an external stimulus
How classical and operant conditioning differ: Operant Conditioning
-R-S: Response-Stimulus
-associating a behaviour and its consequence
-when a child touches a hot stove (response) and gets burned (stimulus), they learn to associate touching a stove with pain
-behaviour is more likely to change depending on the consequence that follows it
Forms of reinforcement (operant conditioning): Primary Reinforcers
-naturally satisfying or desirable
-food, shelter, water
-e.g. rat pressing a lever to receive food (a primary reinforcer)
Forms of reinforcement (operant conditioning): Secondary Reinforcers
-stimuli which are related with primary reinforcer
-don’t satisfy physical needs but still desirable
-money, status, grades
Forms of reinforcement (operant conditioning): Positive Reinforcement
-adding a desirable stimulus to increase a behaviour
-e.g. good grade= teacher compliments= study harder
Forms of reinforcement (operant conditioning): Negative Reinforcement
-involves removing an unpleasant stimulus to increase a behaviour
-e.g. studying to avoid stress/poor performance
-removal of stress= reinforcement of studying behaviour
Forms of reinforcement (operant conditioning): Intrinsic Reinforcers
-internally rewarding yourself
-e.g. personal satisfaction from completing a task
Extrinsic Reinforcers: material/tangible
-actual objects like food or toys
Extrinsic Reinforcers: social
-positive recognition from others, teachers, and peer approval
Extrinsic Reinforcers: activity
-opportunities to engage in preferred activities
Extrinsic Reinforcers: token
-items like stickers collected to gain a reward -a token economy
Extrinsic Reinforcers: positive feedback
-lets the person know they’re doing well or making progress
-encouraging the continuation of the behaviour
Common phenomena associated with operant conditioning: Superstitious behaviour
-randomly administer reinforcement can reinforce whatever response it precedes
-e.g. the learner mistakenly believes the response and reinforcement are associated
Common phenomena associated with operant conditioning: Shaping
-method of teaching complex behaviour by reinforcing response that comes close and closer to desired behaviour
-successive approximations
Common phenomena associated with operant conditioning: Chaining
-reinforcing one response then reinforcing two responses in a two then a sequence of three, etc.
Common phenomena associated with operant conditioning: Extinction
-when a response decreases in frequency because it no longer results in reinforcement
Potentially effective and ineffective forms of punishment: Positive Punishment
-involves adding an undesirable consequence in response to a behaviour
-e.g. more homework for talking in class
Potentially effective and ineffective forms of punishment: Negative Punishment
-omission training
-involves taking away a desirable stimulus to reduce the likelihood of a behaviour
-e.g. taking away video games
Potentially effective and ineffective forms of punishment: Delayed Punishment
-can lead to the individual failing to make the connection between their behaviour and the consequence
-must be immediate to be effective
Potentially effective and ineffective forms of punishment: Lack of contingency
-if punishment doesn’t clearly relate to the behaviour = infeffective
Potentially effective and ineffective forms of punishment: Inconsistent Punishment
-if punishment is not consistently applied
-unlikely to discourage the behaviour