1/26
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
When was ‘King Lear’ first performed?
December 1606
The Jacobean Era
Recent accession of James I – his revival of DROK, reputation, and legacy
The Union Question
The Gunpowder Plot & Equivocation
Parliamentary checks on power of monarchy and James’s trouble with parliament
Jacobean era wider context
period of discovery - America was discovered - showing the world was larger than previously thought
Shakespeare was preoccupied with national identity and conflict (union question, political instability)
Shakespeare was not allowed to criticise James I and so set his plays in the past (pagan settings)
Shakespeare’s plays always end in a restoration of order, due to audience expectation and censorship
Within these constraints, Shakespeare criticises the position of (James I) King (DROK) by making Lear imperfect and without full control
Through Lear and Gloucester, Shakespeare criticises Jacobean society as unjust
James I
crowned king in 1603 following an uncertain succession
threat of war from europe (mirroring Cordelia + France invading)
Lear rejects God’s gift of DRoK when he surrenders the throne (and the responsibilities of the throne, the authority of the traitors undermines him, he also has handed over the land - not very kingly as its an abuse of his power given by God to choose who gets what and who is next in line
The Union Question
there was a turbulent history of the relationship between England, Scotland and Wales
Lear’s misguided division of his kingdom - Shakespeare could be anti-union - critical
points on James I’s reputation and legacy
James was accused of having too many favourites
this raised the question of the king’s courtiers/advisors (Gloucester, Kent, Fool)
James became known as ‘the wisest fool in chistendom’ due to speech impediment and drinking (lear as a fool)
gunpowder plot 1605 (after Lear was written)
shows the challenges faced by monarchs in this era and the extent of catholic unrest
comparable to the failed plot of goneril and regan against Lear → throwing him out into the storm
James Shapiro’s ‘Year of Lear’ → the meaning of the word “equivocation” shifted abruptly in the first few years of the seventeenth century to mean “concealing the truth by saying one thing, while deceptively thinking another”
tensions with parliament
in this time there were conflicts between James I and parliament about power and absolutism
the main issue in 1603/4 was whether james could unite england and scotland. he wanted to but govt. did not
question of dissolving parliament or not (mirrors lear and kent → banishment of kent despite needed his advise and protection)
“What need you five-and-twenty, ten, or five[…]?” / “What need you one?”
sources in the creation of King Lear
some say Lear is a composition of different sources
‘Titus Andronicus’ was thought to be the first of Shakespeare’s tragedies, and the fool is killed halfway through much like the fool disappears in the middle of Lear
two late 1500s plays provided the ideas for the 3 sisters and their husbands
‘True Chronicle History of King Leir and His Three Daughters’ (1594)
Edmund Spenser’s 1596 ‘The Faerie Queene’ depicts the hanging of a character Cordelia
parable of the prodigal son
tells the story of forgiveness and mercy between a father and two sons
the youngest leaves home with his inheritance money but spends it all and faces famine
the father forgives him and celebrates his return with a feast
Lear is a prodigal figure (inverted son) to Cordelia’s forgiving character → Cordelia even has Lear in her name phonetically (Corde-lear)
he falls for the lies of his eldest daughters due to his own greed for adoration and vanity and rebukes the one child that loves him unconditionally
he travels around the kingdoms and returns to Cordelia, pleading for her forgiveness
the book of job
Job, religious and wealthy, is put to the test by Satan to see whether Job’s faith in God is due to his wealth and success
after losing all his possessions, children and health, eventually Job trusts God’s plan even though he does not understand it
At the end, God restored all that Job had lost, and gave Job twice as much as he had before
Edgar as a ‘job-like figure’ who reminds Gloucester that “men must endure” aptient suffering for a higher reward (g. wilson knight)
early morality plays
morality plays were popular in the 15th - 16th centuries
they personify virtues and vices, usually in a struggle between good and evil
usually a story of temptation, fool and redemption
provides audiences with moral guidance
the Everyman is a central doctrine of medieval Christianity where personified forces guide him towards death
Lear is presented as an everyman figure but without redemption (apart from Lear’s reconciliation with Cordelia)
malcontent
staple figure of elizabethan/jacobean drama
world weary cynic expressing his contempt for the world
Edmund - outside normal boundaries of society - use of soliloquy (bringing us almost to empathise with him)
Machiavelli
the idea that there is no place for morality in a political world
Edmund, Goneril and Regan are all Machiavellian characters
Through these characters, Shakespeare critiques the corrupting influence of power and the dangers of unchecked ambition
the world of king lear is a machiavellian fantasy of politics where God provides no guidance (eg. the storm - not divine justice but violent force of nature)
Nahum Tate
audiences found the ending too shocking
rewritten by Nahum Tate in 1681
Happier ending (more popular in the 18th and 19th centuries)
this more closely resembled the original stories that shakespeare used to write King Lear - diluted the existentialist aspects
what is catharsis
Aristotle said catharsis is the purging of pity and fear in an audience
it is a relief for the audience when a character takes responsibility
define hamartia. what are the characters hamartias?
fatal flaw of a hero leading to downfall (Aristotle)
Edmund - illegitimacy and bitterness (at society and gloucester)
Goneril - greed for power
Regan - reliance on other people/weakness, her greed for power
Cordelia - loyalty to her father, too truthful and moral - doesn’t fit in this unjust world
Lear - vanity and pride
anagnorisis
moment of critical discovery or realisation (aristotle)
presented as a process in KL
lear has a personal and political anagnorisis
he realises that nature is separate to monarchy, the unjust nature of poverty and power, and his failure of his role of head of state (political anagnorisis) + redemption with cordelia (personal anagnorisis)
the process begins when he strips himself of the royal robes (storm scene, scene 3)
illegitimacy
illegitimates cannot inherit, and have no place in society
they are outside usual legitimate power structures which means they are associated with lawlessness
they are in a perfect position to act as commentators (soliloquy)
like Shylock’s ‘Has not a Jew eyes..?’ speech from MoV, Edmund says ‘Why bastard? Wherefore base?’
views of women in the 1600s
no autonomy - enshrined in the identities of their fathers/husbands/masters
often acted as councillors to their husbands, without their own political views
the 3 daughters all reject the view of having their husbands’ identities and are stronger than their husbands in all cases - they all have a distinct power and set of morals and motivations unrelated to their husbands
women suffered from ‘hysteria passio’, meaning ‘affliction of the womb’ → the epitome of the condition was to be found in a female organ
Stagecraft and performances
Cordelia and the Fool being the same actor - ambiguity of “my poor fool is hanged!” - Fool often closest to Lear much like a surrogate for Cordelia not being there having been banished
Lack of understanding w/ actors and their scripts as they were given scripts with only their lines on them (more shock/realism when having the conversations) → power dynamic between actors who were made to feel like they were relying on the other actors (like a dance)
Characters would have known the interaction has not gone well by their own lines but would be shocked at the extent to which Lear got angry, for example = more realistic reaction
King George III
Production of King Lear was stopped - between 1810-1820 - due to the mental illness of King George III
King George III reigned from 1760-1820 (went mad in his last years)
The parallel between the play's mad king and the king's condition was deemed too unsettling and potentially disrespectful → supports points about ‘King Lear’ being a political play
The ban lasted for nine years
in how many of shakespeare’s plays do father-daughter relationships feature?
father-daughter relationships feature in 21 of shakespeare’s plays, out of his total 38
significance of the last line of the play
“speak what we feel, not what we ought to say”
traditionally given to the most powerful character on stage in the 16/17thc
some attempt at catharsis amongst the macabre nature of the final scene
quos vult perdere jupiter dementat prius
“those whom god wishes to destroy, he first deprived them of reason/drives them mad”
cassandra figure
In Greek mythology, Cassandra is a prophetess who foretells future events accurately, but her prophecies are always disregarded
the fool is a cassandra figure in ‘king lear’ - a voice of reason, arguably symbolic of Lear’s conscience, yet never listened to
the fool disappears in the middle of the play, perhaps symbolic of Lear succumbing to total madness
differences between the quarto and folio
folio has some semblances of hope - quarto has less lines and culminates in a more bleak, miserable play
folio includes the lines “look here!” before lear dies - he dies similarly to gloucester “smilingly” with some hope and comfort that his daughter may still be alive
folio includes about 10 lines extra in the scene where gloucester has his eyes gouged out (act 3, scene 7) - includes two unnamed servants “fetch some flax and white of egg to help his face. Heaven help him!” - more merciful than the quarto which omits any semblance of humanity