1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Cutter v Powell
general rule of performance - you must do what you promised to do other wise you will be entitled to nothing
C didn’t complete voyage so not entitled to wages
Re Moore and Landauer
Rule 2 - Performance must match contractual terms
Ritchie v Atkinson
Divisible / Severable Contracts
Bolton v Mahadeva
Substantial Performance - Not found in this case (entire contract had to be performed as was a lump sum contract and therefore couldnt claim substantial performance)
enables a party who has performed a contract with only minor defects to claim the price of the work done less any money the ohter party has to pay to put right the defects
Hoenig v Isaacs
Substantial Performance - Was found in this case
D had to pay for defects to furnishings
Sumpter v Hedges
Acceptance of Partial Performance
C can accept partial performance and D may be entitled to pay on a quantum meruit basis
but where innocent party has no option but to accept then it won’t be consent to part peformance - S v H
Planche v Colburn
where the party prevented the other party performing the contract, they can be awarded damages for the amount that they have performed (company cancelled series after C already wrote books)
Charles Rickards v Oppenheim
where there is a delay to performance, the innocent party can cancel it when ‘time was of the essence’
Union Eagle v Golden
where time of essence contract can be repudiated where time for completion was a term of contract - breach means innocent party can treat the contract as terminated