Article 8- Right to fanily life and private life

What kind of right is it

Qualified

What case said positive steps should be taken to protect this right

Sheffield and Horsham v UK

What case said they are entitled to compensation if an interference isn’t justified

Copland v UK

What case said private life is not capable of exhaustive definition

Peck v uk

What case said a private life includes a persons physical and psychological integrity

Botta v Italy

What case said surveillance is a breach of private life

Halfrod v UK

What case include a persons physical and social identity

Pretty v UK

Case where laws that regulate or restrict sexual orientation is a breach

Dudgeon v UK

Case for transgender rights

Goodwin v UK

Case where not destroying DNA details aren’t destroyed is a breach

S and marker v UK

Case where medical records fall under personal data

MS v Sweden

What must police searches be

Justified with the aim to prevent crime

Case for police searches

Gillian v Quinton

Case where photography is a breach

Wood v commissioner of police of the metropolis

Case where names cannot be interfered with unless the name is ridiculous

Johansson v Finland

Case where access to medical treatment

Evans v UK

What case defined family

Kroon v Netherlands

What was the definition of family

Don’t allow legal forms to prevail over biological and social reality

Case where family includes children and grandchildren

Marckx v Belgium

Case where same sex relationships are family

Shalk v Kopf

Case where cohabiting couples are family

kamal v UK

Case where the state can deport criminals

Nasri v France

What cases does the margin of appreciation differ in family cases

Child protection cases

Case where the cases of the child means they child must be the paramount decision

Yousef v Netherlands

What is the duty of home

To respect a persons existing home and doesn’t extend to the homeless

What case doesn’t guarantee the right to a home

Novoseletskiy v Ukraine

Case where the failure to provide alternative accommodation to the severely disabled is a breach

Mazari v Italy

Case where home stretches to the workplace

Niemietz v Germany

What case said if a person wants to interfere in correspondence they must have justification

Klass v Germany

Legal interception of communication by the state it set up a framework to avoid abuse of power case

Barbalescu v Romania

Data retention must be necessary for the purpose of investigating a serious crime case

Tele 2 Sverige and Watson

What sections is restrictions

8(2)

Case where restrictions must be in accordance with the law

Copland v UK