Assault + Battery

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Where is assault now defined

Used to be common law

R v Little confirms it is now under s39 CJA 1988

2
New cards

What is the maximum sentence and fine for Assault and Battery

- Up to 6 months imprisonment

- Up to £5000 fine

3
New cards

Actus Reus for Assault

Case examples

Act or words causing the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force. An omission is not sufficient

Logdon v DPP - Used a fake gun to scare victims

R v Lamb - Victim was not in fear of the revolver and therefore was not assaulted

4
New cards

R v Constanza

2 Points

  1. Court of Appeal held Written letters Amounted to an Assault

  2. Shows Immediate means anytime not excluding the near future

D stalked a woman causing Clinical Depression

5
New cards

R v Constanza

Fear for unlawful force can be for anytime not excluding the immediate future

6
New cards

R v Ireland

Silent phone calls can be an Assault if they cause apprehension of fear

7
New cards

Smith v Chief

Shows Fear must be of Immediate Force for Assault

Does not have to be instantaneous but that force could happen very soon

D Broke into garden and was looking through window causing apprehension of immediate unlawful force

8
New cards

Tuberville v Savage

Words can prevent negate an assault

Ds words showed he was not going to use violence and there was no assault.

R v Light - Words were not enough to negate the fear

9
New cards

R v Misalati

Spitting can be an assault

10
New cards

Read v Coker

Threats/rolling up sleeves can amount to Assault

11
New cards

Mens rea of Assault

Intention or subjectively reckless to cause victim to apprehend unlawful force

Cunningham - defines Subjectively Reckless

12
New cards

Where is Battery contained under?

s39 of Criminal Justice Act 1988

13
New cards

Actus reus of battery + a case illustrating force

The application of unlawful force to another person

Thomas - Can be the slightest touch

14
New cards

Colins v Wilcock

3 points

  1. Any touch without consent or legal justification can be Battery

  2. Reasonable Touch is social situations is acceptable

  3. There is no need to prove pain

15
New cards

Wood v DPP (Arrest)

Force used for an arrest is only lawful if the arrest itself is lawful

Arrest is lawful when there is reasonable suspicion + The person is informed they are under arrest and reasons why

16
New cards

Fagan v Metropolitan Police

Battery can be a Continuing Act

- Accidentally parked car on officers foot

- Continuing act of keeping the car on the officer’s foot became Intentional once Fagan refused to move it.

17
New cards

Two Types of Battery

Direct act

Indirect Act - DPP v K

18
New cards

DPP v K

Reinforced where

Established Battery can be indirect act

Defendant does not need to physically touch victim

Reinforced in Haystead - Recklessly punched woman causing her to drop her baby

19
New cards

When can battery arise from an omission

2 cases

When there is a Duty of Care eg contract, relationship

DPP v Santa-Bermudez - Officer was pricked by a needle in Ds pocket, D failed to let her know

R v Miller - Have a Duty of Care to prevent harm from a dangerous situation you created

20
New cards

R v Miller

Duty of care to prevent harm from dangerous situation created

Failure to do so amounts to Omission

- Set fire to his mattress which spread to his building. If he failed to alert others he could've been liable for battery.

21
New cards

Pegram v DPP

Victim must actually apprehend Unlawful Force

No Apprehension = No Assault

22
New cards

When is reasonable force lawful

  1. In most cases when consent is given

  2. In self defence

  3. For the prevention of a crime

  4. In physical chastisement of a child, without injury (A v UK)

23
New cards

What is the mens rea of battery

Intentional or reckless application of unlawful force onto another

24
New cards

R v Cunningham

+ another case

A person is Subjectively reckless when they Foresee the Risk of Harm and still take it

R v Venna - Confirmed Subjective Recklessness is sufficient for battery

25
New cards

Cases for Common Assault (Evaluation)

R v Thomas

MPC v Fagan

Smith v Superintendent

Santa Bermudez

R v Little

26
New cards

Immediate

Smith v Chief

  1. Fear must be of Immediate Force for Assault

  2. Does not have to be instantaneous but that could happen very soon