1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Where is assault now defined
Used to be common law
R v Little confirms it is now under s39 CJA 1988
What is the maximum sentence and fine for Assault and Battery
- Up to 6 months imprisonment
- Up to £5000 fine
Actus Reus for Assault
Case examples
Act or words causing the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force. An omission is not sufficient
Logdon v DPP - Used a fake gun to scare victims
R v Lamb - Victim was not in fear of the revolver and therefore was not assaulted
R v Constanza
2 Points
Court of Appeal held Written letters Amounted to an Assault
Shows Immediate means anytime not excluding the near future
D stalked a woman causing Clinical Depression
R v Constanza
Fear for unlawful force can be for anytime not excluding the immediate future
R v Ireland
Silent phone calls can be an Assault if they cause apprehension of fear
Smith v Chief
Shows Fear must be of Immediate Force for Assault
Does not have to be instantaneous but that force could happen very soon
D Broke into garden and was looking through window causing apprehension of immediate unlawful force
Tuberville v Savage
Words can prevent negate an assault
Ds words showed he was not going to use violence and there was no assault.
R v Light - Words were not enough to negate the fear
R v Misalati
Spitting can be an assault
Read v Coker
Threats/rolling up sleeves can amount to Assault
Mens rea of Assault
Intention or subjectively reckless to cause victim to apprehend unlawful force
Cunningham - defines Subjectively Reckless
Where is Battery contained under?
s39 of Criminal Justice Act 1988
Actus reus of battery + a case illustrating force
The application of unlawful force to another person
Thomas - Can be the slightest touch
Colins v Wilcock
3 points
Any touch without consent or legal justification can be Battery
Reasonable Touch is social situations is acceptable
There is no need to prove pain
Wood v DPP (Arrest)
Force used for an arrest is only lawful if the arrest itself is lawful
Arrest is lawful when there is reasonable suspicion + The person is informed they are under arrest and reasons why
Fagan v Metropolitan Police
Battery can be a Continuing Act
- Accidentally parked car on officers foot
- Continuing act of keeping the car on the officer’s foot became Intentional once Fagan refused to move it.
Two Types of Battery
Direct act
Indirect Act - DPP v K
DPP v K
Reinforced where
Established Battery can be indirect act
Defendant does not need to physically touch victim
Reinforced in Haystead - Recklessly punched woman causing her to drop her baby
When can battery arise from an omission
2 cases
When there is a Duty of Care eg contract, relationship
DPP v Santa-Bermudez - Officer was pricked by a needle in Ds pocket, D failed to let her know
R v Miller - Have a Duty of Care to prevent harm from a dangerous situation you created
R v Miller
Duty of care to prevent harm from dangerous situation created
Failure to do so amounts to Omission
- Set fire to his mattress which spread to his building. If he failed to alert others he could've been liable for battery.
Pegram v DPP
Victim must actually apprehend Unlawful Force
No Apprehension = No Assault
When is reasonable force lawful
In most cases when consent is given
In self defence
For the prevention of a crime
In physical chastisement of a child, without injury (A v UK)
What is the mens rea of battery
Intentional or reckless application of unlawful force onto another
R v Cunningham
+ another case
A person is Subjectively reckless when they Foresee the Risk of Harm and still take it
R v Venna - Confirmed Subjective Recklessness is sufficient for battery
Cases for Common Assault (Evaluation)
R v Thomas
MPC v Fagan
Smith v Superintendent
Santa Bermudez
R v Little
Immediate
Smith v Chief
Fear must be of Immediate Force for Assault
Does not have to be instantaneous but that could happen very soon