Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
For conviction records, the EEOC asks
Employers can ask & make offers contingent.
But need to ask:
1. Type
2. When it occurred
For a position like a pilot where it is essentail that the employee be able ot perform all tasks it is best to use
Multiple Hurdles Model
At each step, have 1 section tool/question
If not met, screened out
To determine if turnover is at a rate that is an issue for your organization, you should use:
Benchmark
Ex. What is the current turnover rate, Job satisfaction averages, competitors/industry standards
Calculate Turnover rate
True or False: A measure can be reliable but not valid.
True
reliability is the first step / pre-requisite
Unreliable = too much error, cannot predict anything yet
Pros of Centralized Recruiting
It tends to be more cost effective
Eliminate duplication of effort
Disadvantages of Centralized Recruiting
Difficult to tailor recruiting (Depending on geographic location, culture)
Slower
A job analysis can be used for (4)
Setting compensation levels
Reviewing performance
Designing the selection plan
As a legal defense
According to EEOC guidelines, demographic information
Should not be available to those asking the hiring decisions
Can be collected but on a separate form
What does a well written KSAO have?
1. Verb
2. Object of verb
3. What is produced?
4. What are you using?
Be specific
A Markov Analysis is
A tool to forecast labor supply
Current employees’ availability
Then, you forecast demand / needs
Which of the following is a method determining if an assessment tool is adding value to a selection plan?
Utility Analysis
Staffing (definition)
Process of (3):
1. Staffing
2. Deploying
3. Retaining
of the Workforce of sufficient quantity & quality to create positive impacts on the org’s effectiveness
What are the (5) types of staffing models?
Staffing Quantity
Staffing Quality
Staffing System Components
Staffing Organizations
Staffing Strategy
Staffing Quantity
Levels → Using forecasting tools to meet company objectives
Availabilities → At the end of x years, how many will still be in that position
Outcomes:
1. Equal → blissful, fully staffed projection
2. More → excess amount of people
Fewer —> Understaffed
Staffing Quality
Person-Job Match
Match rewards w/ person’s motivation
Person-Job Match
Consider job requirements & candidate/employee KSAOs
Person/Organization Match
Long term, company as a whole
Can the person fit in wide range of jobs at company
Ability to be promoted
Staffing System Components
Applicant has the power in job search
Pay attention to evaluation process
“easy for orgs to “drop the ball”
Staffing Organizations
HR & staffing are tied to vision & mission of the org.
Org must consider:
Where they recruit
What candidates qualified
How to retain
Staffing Strategy
Key Decisions about acquisition, deployment, retention of workforce
Decisions: focuses on staffing levels & staffing quality
3 Types of Employment Relationships:
Employer-Employee
Independent Contractors
Temporary Employees
Employer-Employee
Written/verbal contract
Employment-at-will
Independent Contractors
Not employees, employer pays fees to I.C.
No tax withholdings/tax payments
Not regulated by discrimination laws
Temporary Employees
Should not have business cards, employer must keep line firm (between employees & temps.)
Discrimination laws apply to temp agency & company paying for temp services
Temp agency “loans” people to company
Responsible for recruiting, paying, etc.
Disparate Impact
Indirect, unintended discrimination towards specific group
ex. height requirements for all applicants
Impacts women unfairly
Disparate Treatment
Direct discrimination towards a specific group
Ex. making X race take a test when applying
4/5ths Rule
Ratio of any group must be at least 80% of the most populous group
Ex. If you hire 20 Caucasians, how many of the minority group should be hired?
20 × 0.80 = 16
16 of the minority group
Civil Rights Act of 1991
Prohibits race norming → gives everyone a fair chance
Increases plantiff’s burden of proof, plantiff must:
1. Identify selection practice in question AND
2. Demonstrate the adverse impact
BUT plantiff can now sue for both compensatory & punitive damages
Age Discrimination Act 1967
Protection for 40+
Age can be used as BFOQ (ex. pilots can’t be older than 65, safety issues)
Prohibits mandatory
Retirement age
Provides the right for trial for jury → emotional component, trigger juror
One of the fastest growing areas of discrimination suits
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Created EEOC
Claims must be made within 180 days of discrimination
A. Step 1: No Fault Settlement attempt
Step 2: Investigation - looking for prima facie (“probable cause”)
If agreement not reached → right to sue
EEOC litigates, can continue litigating & suing
B. “no probable cause” / not enough evidence
Americans with Disabilities (ADA) of 1990
Employers required to make “reasonable accommodation” unless it poses “undue hardship”
Ex. alter work schedule, modify training, adjusting font, etc.
Prohibits pre-employment inquiries asking about disability
Unless applicant brings it up
Employers should not be asking you to fill out disability form prior to offer
Applicant can sue if they feel discrminated → potential class action
Applicant can sue if they feel discriminated → potential class action
Pre-employment medical exams are restricted to those that are job related
Can only be given at offer stage
Immigrant Reform & Control Act (1986)
Created the I-9 Form → usually 1st day of employment
Illegal to hire/employ anyone not authorized to work in the U.S.
Prohibits giving employment discrimination based on national org /citizenship
Visa/Sponsorship question should not be asked at applicant stage
Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970
Asked of people who handle large sums of money
Before obtaining a credit report:
1. Written notice to applicant
2. Obtain written consent from applicant
After obtaining a credit report:
1. Notify applicant of action, agency used, suggest that they have right to obtain copy of free report
2. NOT required to identify specific info that “turned off” employer
How do organizations defend themselves when facing a disparate treatment case (2)
1. Stock Statistics
A of minorities employees / total # employees
B # of minorities
If B is significantly less than A = case for disparate treatment
2. Relative Labor Market (RLM)
Critical in discrimination cases
Examples:
Geographical Location
Skill level
General population
Labor Force data
Actual applicant flow data
What is included in the planning process?
Projected Staffing Requirements —> Projected Staffing Availabilities
Compare with Environmental Scanning / External Factors
Forecast Demand (Need) + Forecasting Availability (Supply)
External Factors
Competitors
Social/Economic State
Labor Market
Demand/Seasonality
Employer vs. Candidate market
Labor Market Impact on Staffing
Changes in pay/benefits
Signing bonuses/stock options
Use of temps
Changes in standards (safety too)
Overtime requirements
Changes in business hours
Forecasting HR Requirements
Quantitative
Markov Analysis + (Trend, Ratio, Regression Analyses)
Qualitative
Judgmental - “gut feeling”
Succession Planning
Helps with:
1. Forecasting Demand
2. Developmental (employees/culture)
Typically only for upper positions
Look at “lower” employees who have similar KSAOs, experience, performance reviews, etc. as past person
What does a Markov Analysis do?
Quantitatively forecasting labor demand / need
Job Analysis
Systematic process for collecting info on work related aspects of a job
Builds selection process & plan
Steps of Job Analysis Method (4)
Collect Work Related-Info
Tasks, duties, work behaviors, critical incidents, etc.
Human Attributes
KSAOs required
Selection Instruments
Tests, employment interviews, applicant questionnaires
Employee Performance Measures
Performance appraisals, productivity assessments
How to prioritize positions that need a job analysis
(Management vs. Legal Perspective)
Management Perspective:
Is it a feeder position
If performance appraisal is low
Job has changed
Legal Perspective
Entry level jobs
Large applicant pools
Identify a “well-written” task statement / KSAO
See air traffic signals 1 mile away in the dark
Certified in CPR
Lift up to 60 pounds overhead
Ability to lift thirty pound box from ground to
chest 10 times in 2 minutes
Ability to supervise 5 Sunday School
teachers’ lesson plans and daily activities
Identify how to write a “well written” task statement
Action
Object of verb (to whom or what)
Result
Materials used
1. What does worker do?
2. To whom or what does the worker do it?
3. What is produced?
4. What materials, tools, procedures or equipment are used?
How to perform strong job analysis?
Should be in writing
Should describe in detail the procedures used
Job data should be from a variety of sources (2 or more)
Specific tasks, duties, and activities – answer all 4 questions
Specific KSAOs
Most important tasks used to guide the choice of the selection device
Specify competency levels of job performance for entry-level jobs
Centralized Recruiting
Recruiting done in 1 place (HQ typically)
Pros:
Less costly
Less duplication of effort
Cons:
Takes longer
HQ may not be familiar w/ certain locations (ex. different cultures)
Decentralized Recruiting
Recruiters in multiple locations
Pros:
Culture
Tailor to geographic location
Cons:
Duplication of effort
Costly
Open Messages (Recruiting)
Ads meant to reach as many people as possible
Ex. fast level, retail, anything entry level
Target Messages (Recruiting)
Identify “target market” & gear efforts for those most qualified for job
Non-discriminatory
Admin Issues in Recruiting
Takes time & effort for Job Requisition to be passed
Recruitment Guide
Follow & Consider “Roadmap for Recruiting”
Budget
Who recruits
Where
Who signs off, who interviews, etc.
Record keeping
Recruiter characteristics & training
Standardized Measurement (Definition)
Using same measurement for all group
Administration of / Giving measure should be identical for all participants
Ex. Group A given measurement early, Group B at interview
Group A & B should do measurement the same way
Reliability
Work sample itself
Assessment of consistency
Validity
Relationship between work sample & job performance
Work sample correlation w/ predicting job performance
Nominal
Demographic surveys
Mutually Exclusive options
(ex. age, gender, education)
Ordinal
Putting applicants in order (best → worst)
Don’t know the distance between applicants
(Ex. strongly agree - agree - disagree - strongly disagree)
Ratio Analysis
Ordinal + Interval
Rank applicants & know the distance between applicants
Can be 0
Ex. WPM< pounds you can carry
Interval
Put applicant in order or rank
But difference between applicants is the same
Test-Retest
Give same group of people same test at different occassion
Issue: Time
6 weeks - 6 months is reasonable time
Parallel or Equivalent Forms
2 different groups given to same group
Issue:
Creating similar exams with same difficulty
Internal Consistency
Same question, worded differently
Similarity of content & between items
Inter-rater Agreement
% of rater agreement (between 2 or more raters)
If 0.75+ → reasonably on same page
Intra-rater
One-person, correlation between scores at 2 different times
0.75+ = good
* means
95% accuracy (5% chance error exists)
** means
99% accuracy (1% chance error exists)
*** means
99.9% accuracy 0.01% chance error exists)
Concurrent Validity
Collect data simultaneously (at the same time)
Make sure to have employees reflective of talent pool
Pro:
Convenience
Predictive Validity
Applicant pool is your sample
Not used as much
Pro:
Don’t have to worry about applicant pool
Con:
Could lead to disparate impact
Must wait for scores
Content Validity
Ask subject matter experts (SMEs)
Look at work samples
Face Validity
How the test looks to the applicant
Should make sure the work sample relates to the job
Construct Validity
Make sure what we’re measuring is a distinct variable
Ex. Job satisfaction vs. turnover
Validity (activity)
r with _
Reliability (activity)
% agreement (raters)
test-retest r
What should you not ask for job applications & interviews?
EEOC Info (as part of application, must be completely separate)
Marital Status / Having kids
Ethnicity
Specific Age (only ask: Over age of 18 / 21)
Height or Weight
Arrest Records
Friends / Relatives of company (Not in application process)
“If need sponsorship to work in the U.S.”
Organizational Memberships
Issues regarding collecting Demographic Data
Should be completely separate from application & voluntary
Could result in disparate treatment (by basis of sex, gender, age, citizenship, etc.)
Letters of Recommendation
Can have “canned” (templated) documents, resulting in inconsistency/ reliability
Refrences
Contacting past employer to employees’ past behavior/performance
How to perform reference check / gather reference info?
1. Prepare specific questions
2. Include a signed release from the applicant
3. Call HR & follow up
Ask how to make request in accordance to company policies
4. If Denied, inform their HR & applicant that:
“Due to organization’s failure to provide reference, the application will be incomplete”
Biographical Data
“Best predictor of future performance is past”
Usually gathered in survey
Focus on achievements & experiences
Background Checks
Indicator of behavioral reliability
Useful for positions where integrity and emotional adjustment required
Should only be used when job related
Ex. Criminal record, credit history, driving violations
Challenge - info contained in various databases
When is it appropriate to use personality tests as a substantive assessment?
Weak situations - personality strongly impacts on-the-job behavior
Ex. recruiters
Recruiter decides when, where, how, what to say, etc.
Self-report Questionnaires
Easiest
Ex. Myers Briggs, Big 5
Challenge: people can “lie” on surveys & people may be unfairly screened out (due to honesty)
Can be overcome through “Projective Techniques”
Projective Techniques
Inkblots, sentence completion
Candidate may not know what the interviewer is looking for
Behavioral Assessment
Role play
Ex. Customer Service
Role-play: how you would handle an angry customer
Con: may take longer to make question, but more benefiical, puts them on the spot
Becomes more difficult for applicant to lie way through
Can even show candidates/applicants that the organization/person fit may not be good, based off interviewer reaction
Cognitive Ability Tests
High validity for complex jobs
Ex. SAT, ACT - reading comprehension, quantitative skills
Used by NFL - “Wonderlic tests” → understand & memorize complex plays
Use when: don’t know if you can assess KSAO with just interview
Ex. typing test, teaching a class for interviewers, etc.
Challenge:
Can be subject to adverse impact
Integrity Tests
Use in positions where someone has access to large amount of money, sensitive info concerning customers, expensive items
Ex. Data entry - card info
Research shows no adverse impact on women or minorities
Challenge: types of questions
Person with high level of integrity - will often answer honestly & accidentally hurt their chances of employment
Faking response is larger issue
Reference checks may help
Contingent Assessment Methods
Extend the offer, then offer is contingent on passing….
Ex.
Drug Tests
Medical Exams
Discretionary Assessment Methods
Use when narrowing down applicant pool
Focus on fit with: organization, culture, ability to be a “team player”
Demographics can play a role
Issues with Drug Testing
Cost benefit analysis
Must find reputable lab
High false positive - turning people away bc results falsely positive
High false negative - hiring people who failed drug test
Need signed consent form from applicant
Validate those who test positive (test-retest)
Rejected applicants need a means to appeal
Protecting candidates’ right to privacy
Don’t put in personnel file
Only 1 - 2 people should have access
Medical Exam
Ex. Walmart wanted to hire less people who were obese
Realized healthcare costs were high
Negatively affected Walmart
Only use when job-related
Is a personality test considered a medical exam?
Stick with traits that are job related
CONFIDENTIALITY
Utility Analysis (Definition)
Discerning if specific test (ex. personality test) is “worth it”
Limitations:
Selection Ratio
For each selection cycle, what % was hired
Lower % = better, shows selection tool is helping team
Base Rate
# successful employees / total employees
Higher % = continue to use
Economic Gain
Additional Revenue - Additional Cost
Additional Revenue:
Increased sales
Tenure
Correlation of predictor & job performance
Standard deviation of job performance
Average score on predictor
CALCULATE Additional Costs
# APPLICANTS * PER TEST
Compensatory Model
Allows applicant to use more of strengths
Quantifies process to give less weight to shortcomings
Clinical Prediction
1 person looks at selection plan & selects weights
Unit Weighting
Everything in selection process is weighted equally
Rational Weighting
Minimizes bias by having team
Multiple Regresison
Quantitative
Someone helps with data analysis