1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Temperament
Traits related to
emotion expression and reactivity (how strong of emotions do they feel)
Activity (how physically active)
Attention/focus (how long do you stay on one task)
“Constitutional”/ early appearing/ biological
Focus on individual difference
Rothbart and Bates (IBQ/CBQ)
Five dimensions
Fear/fearful distrust
Distress at limitations/ irritable distress
Attention span/ focus/ persistence
Activity level
“Smiling and laughter”/ positive affectvity
Effortful control/ regulation (appears 2-3 years)
Fear/ fearful distrust
Afraid of new things/ people/ places/ noises/ changes
Distress at limitations/ irritable distress
How upset they are at having to wait for something
Strapped in chair
Attention span/ focus/ persistence
How long do they sit with a picture book/ play with something
How long can they work on something
Activity level
Infants: moving around in crib
Effortful control/ regulation
Beginning executive function traits
Three types of children (Thomas & Chess)
Easy child (40%)
Difficult child (10%)
Slow-to-warm-up (15%)
Easy child
High in positive affectivity
Easy recovery from distress
Regular routines
Difficult child
High in fearful distress/ slow to adjust to new experiences
React negatively and intensely when distressed
Irregular routines
Slow-to-warm-up
Low activity, low-key reactions to environment
Low in positive affectivity
High in fearful distress/ inhibited
Eventual adjustment (after repeated exposure)
Outcomes of study
70% of “difficult” children developed behavior problems by school age
50% of “slow to warm up” children showed adjustment problems in middle school
18% of “easy” children developed such problems
Dunnedin study
Negative, unregulated children (Casp, Moffitt, & colleagues)
as adolescents
deliquncy
As 21 year olds
living partners: didn’t get along
unemployed
Less social support
Anxiety
As 31-year-olds
Poor health
Less wealth
Higher substance use
Criminality, gambling
Behavior genetics
MZ and DZ twins
Heritability
The extent to which individual differences can be explained by genetic differences
=2(r(MZ)-r(DZ))
Shared environment
Environmental differences between families (shared by family members)
r(MZ) - heritability
Non-shared (unique environment)
Environmental differences within families
Treat children differently, different teachers, friends, sports, sickness
1-r(MZ)
Genetics of temperament
Heritability (infants) = 0.36
Shared environment = 0
Non-shared environment = 0.64
Another twin study of temperament
Moderate to large heritability
Moderate to large non-shared environment
No share environment
Passive gene-environment correlations
Lemery-Chalfant et al measured home environment
CHAOS scale (confusion, hubbub, and order scale)
LEOS scale (living environment observation scale)
Physical safety, home decor, child-friendliness, adequate living space, organization, outside play environment, street condition
Passive gene environment correlations
The home environments themselves were heritable and correlated with child traits
Parents created the home environment using genes they share with their child = passive rGE (gene environment)
Home environment is correlated with genes, so it can’t be separated from heritability
Shared environment is also heritable
“Goodness of fit” model (Thomas & Chess)
Occurs when parents/adults create child-rearing environments that recognize each child’s temperament while encouraging more adaptive functioning
Evocative gene-environment correlation
Doesn’t change temperament but “encourages more adaptive functioning”
Gene-environment interactions
Child who is not inhibited has a middle level of internalizing disorders
Highly inhibited child is less susceptible to insensitive parenting