KEY CASES FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF “IS THERE CLOSE CONNECTION BETWEEN TORT AND ROLE”

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

5 Terms

1
New cards

Mohammed v Morrisons

Employers liable - close connection to job duties

2
New cards

Morrisons v various claimants

No vicarious liability - act done for vendetta, not connected to a job

3
New cards

Dubai aluminium v Salaam

VL applies if wrongful act is closely connected to role that its fair to hold employer liable

4
New cards

Intentional torts and vicarious liability

Modern courts accept vicarious liability for international torts, including battery, sexual assault, theft, misuse of confidential data, harassment and economic interference

5
New cards

What’s an example of intentional torts and vicarious liability

Trustees of Barry congregation of Jehova’s witnesses v BXB