1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Lapit at Pamamaraan
“Approaches & Methods” in Filipino
approaches and methods are different from Western Psychology
Kalahok
subjects or participants
Equal in status to researcher
Umpukan
“natural cluster” that serves as the participants
Participants included as a group, not as individuals
Tulay
“bridge” that introduces the researcher to the umpukan
well respected member of the umpukan
Pakikipagkwentuhan (Kwento)
Informal story-telling with an umpukan
Kalahok do most of the talking
researcher merely facilitates
Panunuluyan (Tuloy)
researcher goes in/ stays in the home of the kalahok while conducting research with consent of host family
Head of family = tulay
Pagdadalaw-dalaw (Dalaw)
researcher occasionally visits the house of the host or tulay
Pagtatanung-tanong (Tanong)
researcher undergoes a questioning session with the kalahok
Questions derived from kalahok’s answers; no leading questions
Pakikiramdam (Damdam)
researcher uses their own feelings to justify if the kalahok are ready to be a part of the research
Relies on the inner perception of emotions
Pakapa-kapa (Kapa)
researcher uses groping (mix of feelings & circumstances) to justify research
Unsystemized mass of social and cultural data to obtain order, meaning, direction for research
Rooted in the word for “to grope in the dark”
Ginabayang-Talakayan
collective indigenous discussion
Nakikiugaling-Pagmamasid
participant observation
Pakikisama
getting along with