1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
history of L2 motivation research
The study of L2 motivation has evolved through several phases, influenced by psychological theories and educational shifts:
Early 20th Century (Behaviorist Approach): Focused on conditioning and habit formation (stimulus-response).
Mid-20th Century (Humanist Theories): Rogers and Maslow emphasized self-actualization and a hierarchy of needs (e.g., psychological, safety, esteem).
Cognitive Revolution: Shifted to mental processes, expectancy-value theories (e.g., beliefs about success and task value), and self-efficacy (Bandura).
Social-Psychological Approach (Gardner, 1970s–80s): Highlighted integrative (desire to connect with L2 community) and instrumental (practical benefits) orientations.
1990s Educational Shift (Dörnyei, Williams & Burden): Expanded to multi-level frameworks (language, learner, and learning situation) and process-oriented models (temporal changes in motivation).
types of motivation
Integrative Motivation: Desire to engage with the L2 community/culture (e.g., interest in French culture for French learners).
Instrumental Motivation: Pragmatic goals (e.g., career advancement, exams).
Intrinsic Motivation: Driven by inherent enjoyment or curiosity (e.g., learning Spanish for fun).
Extrinsic Motivation: Driven by external rewards/pressure (e.g., grades, parental expectations).
Self-Determination Theory (SDT): Continuum from amotivation to intrinsic motivation, emphasizing autonomy, competence, and relatedness
Achievement Motivation: Need for success vs. fear of failure.
Social Motivation: Peer/teacher influence and classroom environment
process oriented view on L2 motivation
Dörnyei’s model divides motivation into dynamic phases:
Preactional Stage (Choice Motivation):
Goal setting, influenced by attitudes, expectancy of success, and task value.
Example: A student chooses to learn Japanese due to interest in anime (integrative value).
Actional Stage (Executive Motivation):
Maintaining effort through autonomy, feedback, and self-regulation (e.g., breaking tasks into subtasks).
Example: Using rewards or group cohesion to sustain effort during a semester.
Postactional Stage (Retrospection):
Reflecting on outcomes via attributions (e.g., "I succeeded because I worked hard").
Influences future motivation (e.g., positive feedback encourages continued study).
motivational teaching practices
Creating Basic Conditions:
Positive classroom atmosphere, teacher enthusiasm, cohesive learner groups.
Generating Initial Motivation:
Enhance task relevance (e.g., tie lessons to students’ career goals).
Boost self-efficacy (e.g., "You can do this!" feedback).
Maintaining Motivation:
Autonomy-supportive tasks (e.g., student-chosen projects).
Protect self-esteem (e.g., constructive feedback).
Encouraging Retrospection:
Promote adaptive attributions (e.g., linking success to effort, not luck).
Use rewards judiciously (e.g., praise progress, not just outcomes).
Example: A teacher uses cooperative learning (social motivation) and lets students select topics (autonomy) to sustain engagement.