introduction to logic
logic: the systematic study of valid rules of inference, i.e. the relations that lead to the acceptance of one proposition (the conclusion) on the basis of a set of other propositions (premises)
uses the premises/conclusion format to come to new knowledge
can be used to make/evaluate various arguments
argument: a discourse in which certain things being said (the premises) imply something else (the conclusion)
arguments in the realm of logic are not fights or squabbles, they are necessary and good
validity: if the conclusion of an argument is logically connected to (or entailed by) the premises; it has the right logical form
when the conclusion logically follows from the premises, the argument is said to be VALID. When it does not, the argument is said to be INVALID.
soundness: if the conclusion of an argument is logically connected to the premises (right logical form) AND all of the premises are true statements
disagreeing with an argument
to disagree with an argument, one must either:
disagree with (one or more of) the premises or
prove the argument does not have a valid form
it is not OK merely to disagree with a conclusion.
validity has nothing to with how you feel about the argument
rarely are arguments found ready-made in logical form
we must locate arguments, isolate them, reconstruct them in logical form, and analyze them
this requires close, careful reading and attention to what others are saying—critical thinking
logical indicators
finding arguments is made easier by locating logical indicators, words that draw attention to premises and conclusions
some PREMISE indicators: because, as, for the reason that, for, given that, since, assuming that, etc.
some CONCLUSION indicators: therefore, thus, ergo, follows that, so, consequently, hence, that is why, etc.
arguments usually aren’t found ready-made in logical form with premises and conclusions identified
usually found in paragraph form/in the comment sections online where all happiness/reason go to die
we must locate arguments, reconstruct them in logical form, and analyze them to see if they actually are valid, or just sound nice while actually being illogical/invalid
informal fallacy: an argument which appears to be valid and convincing but is actually not
logic: the systematic study of valid rules of inference, i.e. the relations that lead to the acceptance of one proposition (the conclusion) on the basis of a set of other propositions (premises)
uses the premises/conclusion format to come to new knowledge
can be used to make/evaluate various arguments
argument: a discourse in which certain things being said (the premises) imply something else (the conclusion)
arguments in the realm of logic are not fights or squabbles, they are necessary and good
validity: if the conclusion of an argument is logically connected to (or entailed by) the premises; it has the right logical form
when the conclusion logically follows from the premises, the argument is said to be VALID. When it does not, the argument is said to be INVALID.
soundness: if the conclusion of an argument is logically connected to the premises (right logical form) AND all of the premises are true statements
disagreeing with an argument
to disagree with an argument, one must either:
disagree with (one or more of) the premises or
prove the argument does not have a valid form
it is not OK merely to disagree with a conclusion.
validity has nothing to with how you feel about the argument
rarely are arguments found ready-made in logical form
we must locate arguments, isolate them, reconstruct them in logical form, and analyze them
this requires close, careful reading and attention to what others are saying—critical thinking
logical indicators
finding arguments is made easier by locating logical indicators, words that draw attention to premises and conclusions
some PREMISE indicators: because, as, for the reason that, for, given that, since, assuming that, etc.
some CONCLUSION indicators: therefore, thus, ergo, follows that, so, consequently, hence, that is why, etc.
arguments usually aren’t found ready-made in logical form with premises and conclusions identified
usually found in paragraph form/in the comment sections online where all happiness/reason go to die
we must locate arguments, reconstruct them in logical form, and analyze them to see if they actually are valid, or just sound nice while actually being illogical/invalid
informal fallacy: an argument which appears to be valid and convincing but is actually not