was Brown v Board 1954 a turning point?

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:49 AM on 11/12/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

5 Terms

1
New cards

main argument

changed the direction of the consitution

2
New cards

what it implied for southern democrats

segregation = unconstitutional

3
New cards

successes of Brown v Board

  • it had limited media impact but it did become a turning point

  • demonstrated other independent judiciary (supreme court) showed they could be positive with civil rights

    • unlike Congress and the President's was showing at this time

  • this ended the vice-like grip of the Plessy v Ferguson precedent of 1896 which had dominated relations ever since

  • the Supreme Court ruling led to more liberal verdicts in the future

  • the verdict gave many southern black people a belief in the American political system and Constitution

  • belief that black people now had tapped out in the system was tapped into by MLK and other leaders 

  • it was a vindication of the legal strategy of the NAACP

  • the NAACP efforts to bring cases to the Supreme Court laid the foundations for the later mid 50s successes of the civil Rights movement

  • the Brown decision signalled the start of a new era

4
New cards

failures of Brown v Board

  • in the Deep South further strategies were now developed to resist the expected pressure to change their approach to race

  • they developed white Citizens councils Earliest was 1955 aiming to maintain a strict segregation

  • the White Citizens Council developed waged economic warfare against anyone supporting integration and defied federal court rulings

    • they were like the KKK without the costumes and lynching

  • Mississippi and Louisiana amended their constitutions to aid the retention of segregation: the South was on the defensive

  • President Eisenhower showed little sign of upholding the decision made by the Supreme Court in the Southern states Eisenhower was not racist

    • he had in fact in the District of Columbia outlawed any forms of racial discrimination

    • he was reluctant to uphold the judgement as he did not stir up resentment and disorder

  • Eisenhower made little judgement on the Brown verdict except to say that he doubted the ability of legislation to change minds and hearts

  • Eisenhower had a passive approach and this was illustrated in 1956 when Governor Daniel in Texas brought out his local troops to prevent integration through force 

5
New cards

reaction to Brown

  • WCC set up in 1954 in south

  • more middle class membership than the KKK but similar aims

  • wanted to intimidate AA into not claiming their rights

  • members used violence and economic power e.g. pressuring insurance companies to cancel AA policies

  • active into the 1960s