Marshall Cases

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 7

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

8 Terms

1

Marbury vs. Madison (1803)

gave the Court the power of judicial review. First overturning of a law (Judiciary Act of 1789)

New cards
2

Cohens vs. Virginia (1821)

states were no longer soverign in all respects since they had ratified the Constitution. State courts must submit to federal jurisdiction

New cards
3

McCullough vs. Maryland (1819)

upheld the right of Congress to charter a national bank and be free from taxation by a state, thus putting into national law the doctrine of implied powers. Maryland's lawyers argued that Congress did not have the right to charter a national bank. "The power to tax involves the power to destroy", responded Marshall, upholding the bank's right to exist and be free from taxes

New cards
4

Gibbons vs. Odgen (1824)

gave the national government undisputed control over interstate commerce by ruling invalid a steamboat monopoly chartered by New York. This freed internal transportation from state restraint

New cards
5

Fletcher vs. Peck (1810)

established the principle that state law was invalid when in conflict with the Constitution and that contracts must be upheld. A land grant given by the Georgia legislature to speculators was revoked by a later legislature. Marshall ruled for the speculators, giving federal protection to purchasers of state-owned lands

New cards
6

Dartmouth College vs. Woodward (1819)

by forbidding the state legislature to alter the college charter, Marshall established the principle that charters were contracts were contracts which could not be impaired

New cards
7

Johnson vs. McIntosh (1823)

offered a preliminary defenition of the place of Indians within the nation. The tribes had a basic right to tribal lands that preceded all other American law. Citizens could not buy or take land from tribes; only the federal government - the supreme authority - could do that

New cards
8

Worcester vs. Georgia

invalidated Georgia laws that attempted to regulate access by U.S. citizens to Cherokee country. As Marshall explains, the tribes were "sovereign entities". In defending the power of the federal government, Marshall affirmed, and indeed expanded, the rights of tribes to remain free from the authority of the states.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
453 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 23 people
729 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
707 days ago
5.0(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
754 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
848 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 28 people
309 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 523 people
659 days ago
5.0(4)
note Note
studied byStudied by 43192 people
104 days ago
4.8(313)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (100)
studied byStudied by 45 people
121 days ago
5.0(3)
flashcards Flashcard (39)
studied byStudied by 2 people
100 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (67)
studied byStudied by 18 people
344 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 20 people
404 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (65)
studied byStudied by 11 people
450 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (113)
studied byStudied by 1 person
629 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (23)
studied byStudied by 13 people
136 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (41)
studied byStudied by 11 people
48 minutes ago
5.0(1)
robot