1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
3 reasons we have emotions
Action → for survival reasons the allow us to react to situations sometimes with minimal conscious awareness e.g. how quickly do you observe people responding when scared
Social connection → we share our emotional experiences and empathise with others. Expressions of emotion make others respond to us e.g. how do you feel if you see someone crying, do you want to ask if they are ok?
Memory → emotions make us remember more vividly, and learn faster e.g. think of your most vivid memories - we create episodic memories of events that have emotion tied to them
James and Lange theory of emotion
1884-1885 developed the same theory independent of eachother
‘the experience of emotion is nothing more than the awareness of physiological responses to emotion arousing stimuli’
E.g. see a bear, start shaking and sweating, HR increases, that is what makes me scared
stimulus → physiological response → experience of response → experience of emotion
4 critical points of James and Lange theory
Emotions are automatic responses triggered by stimuli perception at a cortical level
Both visceral (intuitive, in your gut) and behavioural responses vary depending on the specific emotions
The subjective experience of emotion is a result of perceiving changes within the body
The physiological changes directly follow the perception of the stimulus, and the awareness of these bodily changes constitutes the emotion itself
Cannon and bard theory of emotion
1972
physical sensation and emotions aren’t always connected
Animals and humans who had cortical lesions to the sensory cortex still experience emotions
Other situations produce the same physiological changes e.g. fever, low blood sugar, excersise
The viscera is insensitive - we are mostly unaware of what goes on in our body, we don’t feel the contractions of the stomach etc
Visceral/physiological changes are too slow to give rise to emotions, emotional feelings are instantaneous
How does the thalamus act as a relay centre? Cannon and bard
Send signals to the amygdala and cerebral cortex to provoke feelings
Other signals send from the thalamus to the ANS and skeletal muscles create physiological reactions e.g. sweating
What is the Papez circuit
proposed circuit of emotion
Flow of thoughts and flow of feelings
Thalamus is first relay station
Contains the:
sensory cortex
Anterior thalamus
Hypothalmus - physiological response
Cingulate cortex - conscious feelings
Hippocampus
Papez-MacLean circuit
Maclean proposed limbic circuit
Added more brain structures: amygdala, frontal/orbital cortices, striatum, septum
Thought to be involved in not only emotions but episodic memory too
Definition amygdala
→ organises the behavioural, vegetative and oral responses of anger, fear, anxiety and is involved in sexual and maternal behaviours
3 nuclei of the amygdala
Basolateral nuclei → consists of lateral, basal and accessory-basal nuclei, receives sensory inputs from cortex and thalamus
Medial nucleus → receive olfactory inputs from the bulb
Central nucleus (CE) → send outputs to motor cortex (for action) and hypothalamus (for vegetative functions etc.)
Le Doux animal testing
uses classic fear conditioning in mammals
Physiological responses to fear:
freezing
Increase BP and HR
Analgesia caused by stress
Released ACTH
Translates to humans = some structures responsible for fear conditioning in mammals are also the same in humans
Connection between the amygdala and thalamus
the amygdala receives sensory info via two routes (a rapid one from the thalamus, and a slower one from the sensory cortex)
If the lesion was at the level of striatum or cortex, conditioning was still possible
If the lesion was at the level of the thalamus or midbrain, no conditioning occurred
Conclusion = to learn emotional meaning to a stimulus requires a pathway between the thalamus and amygdala (but doesn’t always require cortical connections)
Sensory/attentional unawarness top-down vs bottom-up
Bottom-up → the salience(stands out from surroundings) of the stimulus capture the focus of attention (true also for emotionally salient stimuli)
Top-down → there is a conscious and ‘central’ decision on where to direct the focus of attention, via the fronto-parietal networks
Sensory unawareness (bottom-up) → the stimulus energy is insufficient to generate conscious perception despite the allocation of attentional resources
3 reasons for sensory.attentional unawarness
subliminal → exposition time is too brief
Subthreshold → the stimuli is too weak
Stimulus onset asynchrony → a second stimuli masks the first, when the inter stimulus interval is less than 30 ms
Conscious/unconscious emotional learning in amygdala
subject shown angry face for <30ms then 45ms of expressionless face
Only saw expressionless = masking
Tested 2 angry faces, one previously conditioned with white noise:
masked presentation of the conditioned angry face activated the right amygdala
The unmasked conditioned angry face activated left but not right amygdala
Conclusions:
Unconscious = right amygdala
Conscious = left amygdala
Attention an emotions for face vs object processing - study
people instructed to either attend to faces or houses, brain activity measure using fMRI
Higher activity in the fusiform face area FFA for faces than houses
Greater FFA activation for fearful faces
Amygdala activate for fearful but not neutral faces
Left amygdala fires regardless of face vs house
This suggest the amygdala is not modulated by attention, contradicts other studies
Effect of attentional load on amygdala response
4 conditions:
FH fearful high distractor
NH normal high distractor
FL fearful low distractor
NL normal low distractor
while early amygdala responding to emotional stimuli (40-140ms) was unaffected by attentional load = bottom up
Later amygdala response (280-410ms), after frontoparietal cortex activity was modulated by attentional load = top down