1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
risk and return
to attract rational investors to take more risk, they must have higher returns
holding period return
change in value over the period it is held
includes additional income earned from the investment
arithmetic average
sum of returns in each period divided by the number of periods
geometric average
single per period return
gives the same cumulative performance as a sequence of actual returns
dollar weighted average return
irr
annual percentage rate
ignores compounding
per period date * periods per yr
effective annual rate
actual rate an investment grows
compounding!
fisher equation
tells us that nominal rates = real rates + expected inflation
inflation history
since the 1950’s, nominal rates have increased roughly in line w inflation
volatile inflation effects real rates or return
scenario analysis
list of possible economic scenarios, the likelihood of each, and the HPR that will be realized
probability distribution
list of possible outcomes with associated probabilities
expected return
the mean value of the squared deviation from the mean
standard deviation
the square root of the variance
normality
HPR’s up to a month can be treated as normal
if they are normally distributed
long term HPR’s deviate more from normality
value at risk
statistical measure of downside risk
focused only on potential losses
worst loss with given probability (usually 1% or 5%)
kurtosis
measures the fatness of the tails of a probability distribution
relative to a normal distribution
indicates likelihood of extreme outcomes
leptokurtic
distribution that is more peaked than normal
platykurtic
a distribution thats less peaked than normal
mesokurtic
normal curve
not too peaked or too flat topped
symmetrical distritbution
mean = median = mode
skewness = 0
risk aversion
investors prefer less risk to more risk
investors do not “minimize risk”
it’s a trade off
risk tolerance
amount of risk an investor can tolerate to achieve an investment goal
higher = greater the willingness to task risks
negatively correlated with risk aversion
risk seeker
will accept more risk for the potential of higher returns
maximizes risk and return
risk neutral
will pursue a portfolio offering higher return
maximizes return irrespective of risk
risk averse
prefer a portfolio with a lower certain return than a higher, less certain return
indifference curve
plots combinations of risk and return for a given level of utility
steep slope = risk averse
flatter = risk seeking
risk free rate
rate of return that can be earned with certainty
risk premium
expected return in excess of that on risk free securities
excess return
rate of return in excess of risk free rate
price of risk
ratio of risk premium to variance
“For each unit of risk (variance), how much extra return am I earning?”
mean variance analysis
evaluating portfolios according to their expected returns and standard deviations (or variances)
sharpe ratio
reward to volatility
ratio of portfolio risk premium to standard dev
“How much extra return (above the risk-free rate) do I get per unit of risk (volatility)?”
time series of return
scenario analysis derived from sample history of return
asset allocation
allocation of an investment portfolio across broad asset classes
capital allocation to risky assets
the choice between risky and risk free assets
complete portfolio
the entire portfolio including risky and risk free assets
capital allocation line
connects the optimal risky portfolio to the risk free asset
two fund separation theorem
all investors, regardless of risk reference and wealth, will hold a combination of a isk free asset and an optimal portfolio of risky assets
passive strategy
investment policy that avoids security analysis
entails indexing
capital market line
capital allocation line using a market index portfolio as a risky asset
cost and benefits of passive investing
is inexpensive and simple