Week 5- Pattern Recognition

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/18

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

19 Terms

1
New cards

what is the primary visual cortex also called?

striate cortex

2
New cards

what is agnosia

Impairment of object recognition ability

•Inability to recognise objects

•In agnosia, processes such as colour, shape, and motion perception are intact

•Recognising a whole object is more than just recognising its parts

3
New cards

what are the two cortical pathways for vision

•Ventral pathway

–Occipital à temporal

–Processes information about object appearance and identity

–Important for object perception

•Dorsal pathway

–Occipital à parietal

–Processes spatial information about objects

–Important for guiding action

4
New cards

Optic ataxia

•Optic ataxia

–Intact object recognition

–Inability to use visual information to guide action

–Associated with lesions in the dorsal pathway (typically in the parietal cortex)

lady trying to grab hammer, Optic ataxia concerns impairments in using visual information to guide motor movements.

5
New cards

Face Perception

-requires holistic processing much harder to recognize isolated parts of faces? compared to maybe houses where a red door would stand out

6
New cards

what are the Gestalt Principles

  • similarity

  • closure

  • good continuation 

  • proximity 

<ul><li><p>similarity</p></li><li><p>closure</p></li><li><p>good continuation&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>proximity&nbsp;</p></li><li><p></p></li></ul><p></p>
7
New cards

We tend to recognize different stimuli as the same object irrespective of what?

•We tend to recognize different stimuli as the same object (e.g., letter “A”) irrespective of superficial variations

•Gestalt principles don’t really help explain why

•Another theory of pattern recognition, template matching, doesn’t explain this either

<p><span><span>•We tend to recognize different stimuli as the same object (e.g., letter “A”) irrespective of superficial variations</span></span></p><p></p><p><span><span>•Gestalt principles don’t really help explain why</span></span></p><p></p><p><span><span>•Another theory of pattern recognition, template matching, doesn’t explain this either</span></span></p><p></p>
8
New cards

Template -matching model

knowt flashcard image
9
New cards

Feature analysis

•A visual pattern is perceived as a combination of elemental features

–Selfridge’s pandemonium model

10
New cards

feature analysis pic 

11
New cards
<p>#idk probs watch the lecture&nbsp;</p>

#idk probs watch the lecture 

knowt flashcard image
12
New cards

Recognition-by-component theory

•Similar mechanisms have been proposed for 3-D object recognition

•An object is first segmented into a set of basic sub-objects (called geons), and then recognised as a pattern composed of geons

<p><span><span>•Similar mechanisms have been proposed for 3-D object recognition</span></span></p><p></p><p><span><span>•An object is first segmented into a set of basic sub-objects (called </span><em><span>geons</span></em><span>), and then recognised as a pattern composed of geons</span></span></p><img src="https://knowt-user-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/309611c4-2307-4ffd-9b6b-c9bb2aa9c047.png" data-width="100%" data-align="center"><p></p>
13
New cards

•Neurons in higher-order visual areas respond to WHAT

•Neurons in higher-order visual areas respond to increasingly complex patterns

<p><span><span>•Neurons in higher-order visual areas respond to increasingly complex patterns</span></span></p><img src="https://knowt-user-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/e47b3d7f-97c0-4491-af9b-aa1e02b64a88.png" data-width="100%" data-align="center"><p></p>
14
New cards

•If we keep going down the visual information processing pathway, can we eventually find a cell that responds to a very, very, very specific stimulus?

•“Grandmother cell” hypothesis

15
New cards

•“Grandmother cell” hypothesis continued and weakness 

•Weaknesses of the grandmother cell hypothesis

–The final percept of an object is coded by a single neuron

•However, each neuron’s firing is not so reliable

•If that neuron is lost, our perception of the corresponding object would be lost

–Perception of novel objects cannot be explained well

–Flexibility of object recognition cannot be explained well

16
New cards

Object recognition results from the firing of an…

•However…

–More recent evidence suggests that grandmother-cell-like neurons might exist (Quiroga et al., 2005)

–But not necessarily in the visual object recognition system per se

<p><span><span>•However…</span></span></p><p><span><span>–More recent evidence suggests that grandmother-cell-like neurons might exist (Quiroga et al., 2005)</span></span></p><p><span><span>–But not necessarily in the visual object recognition system per se</span></span></p>
17
New cards

top-down and bottom-up processing

knowt flashcard image
18
New cards

Word-superiority effect

  • The core finding is that it is easier to identify a letter if it is within a word (like "K" in "WORK") compared to a single, isolated letter ("K") or a non-word string (like "XOWK"). 


<ul><li><p><span>The core finding is that it is easier to identify a letter if it is within a word (like "K" in "WORK") compared to a single, isolated letter ("K") or a non-word string (like "XOWK").</span><span><span>&nbsp;</span></span></p></li><li><p></p></li></ul><p><br></p>
19
New cards

Phoneme-restoration effect

The phoneme restoration effect is a perceptual phenomenon where the brain fills in missing sounds in speech, making them seem to be there even when they are not. This effect, first demonstrated by Warren (1970), allows listeners to understand speech in noisy environments by using surrounding words and sentence context to restore missing or replaced phonemes. For example, a listener might "hear" the missing /s/ in the word "legislatures" if the sentence context supports it. 

<p><span><span>The phoneme restoration effect is </span><strong><mark data-color="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)" style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); color: inherit;"><span>a perceptual phenomenon where the brain fills in missing sounds in speech, making them seem to be there even when they are not</span></mark></strong><span>. This effect, first demonstrated by Warren (1970), allows listeners to understand speech in noisy environments by using surrounding words and sentence context to restore missing or replaced phonemes. For example, a listener might "hear" the missing /s/ in the word "legislatures" if the sentence context supports it.&nbsp;</span></span></p>