1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
UK pop. has grown unevenly in the last 50 years, what areas have grown the fastest and why?
London (global hub) + the South-East: job opportunities & services; in England with 420ppl/km2- most habitable
Eden project economic benefits
Support local business: 2500 local suppliers → upward cumulative causation
e.g. Poppy Treffye
Increased profit → increased local spending + taxes
Added more than £1bn into Cornish economy
Directly created 450 jobs
Eden project social benefits
Employ + train locals → encourage higher education → higher skilled & paid jobs
Directly created 450 jobs
Parties in Eden project & how they measure success
Parish council: employment, representation, less large scale development → success
Stakeholders: profit → success
Locals: employment, inclusion, less pollution → success
Eden project
Greenhouse garden project in Cornwall
opened in 2001
bottom-up dev.: work with locals + local benefits
London Docklands: Issues
poor transport links: 1 irregular bus line, no trains
poverty
social exclusion: walled off, but strong sense of community
for every job lost, 5-10 more lost
London Docklands: gvt aim
water city - like Venice
perceive: “wasteland” “monument to failure”
top down plan, excluding locals
London Docklands renovation
16mn square feet of office & retail space
105 000 people working in Canary Wharf
European HQ for banks e.g. J.P. Morgan
House prices remained relatively affordable, but not for families
DLR: railway built for Canary Wharf → limited in evenings & weekends → built for workers
Renovation London Docklands for locals
Remains isolated from central London
Improved quality of life
New gentrified services
Mismatch of skills → locals excluded from employment
Lower income residents pushed out
However, old jobs were dangerous → now: safer & better paid
Loss of community
London Docklands conclusion
method was poor: exclusion of locals
long term benefits: significant
necessary to counter inevitable decline & deterioration of docklands
Rural idyll
Idealised image of a rural are: dreamlike, calm, relaxing beautiful
Rising cost of living: unattainable for lower socioeconomic status - West Cornwall: food banks, top 10% poorest in EU
High socioeconomic status: attainable - West Cornwall: 80% 2nd homes in some areas, Roseland Park retirement home: Tregony
International migration low income: negatively affect rural idyll for host & migrants: Boston, Linconshire → exploited, highest Brexit voting, loss of culture
Lack of services: West Cornwall: lack of healthcare, educational opportunities, & transport
Not determined by location, but the situation of the residents
Gentrification
Taking and transitioning areas that often had working class function into middle class functions. Oriented to young people & DINKY’s
UK social housing sales
Molenbeek
London Docklands
Belgium demographics
High life expectancy
Roughly equal proportion of women and men until around 65
3 languages: quite divided
Brussels demographics
Large proportion of working age people and young children
40% have foreign nationalities
Majority European immigrants
Brussels demographics explained
Language: large French diaspora
Free movement within EU
Colonial legacy: Congo & Morocco (France)
Diaspora distribution
EU-15: in wealthier areas - South, under CBD
North African: western quarter of inner city
Turkish: NW of CBD in inner city
Social clustering: issues
Lack of communication between cultural groups
Perceived discrimination
→ tension
Tervuren demographics
20 000 people
25% foreign born
80% of foreign born are EU28
High socioeconomic status
Peaks in pop. of children and 30-50 yr olds
BSB: English speaking diaspora
Molenbeek demographics
100 000 people
30% foreign born
One of the poorest areas in Brussels
Around 50% youth unemployment
Molenbeek perceptions
Dangerous: “breeding ground for terrorists”
Originally: industry → cheap housing + labour attracted migrants - industry left → struggle to adapt
Ethno-stratification: segregated into/ experience different socioeconomic status → African immigrants: nearly 90% unemployment rate, when 65% have degrees → Young people perceive this as racial discrimination
Tervuren perceptions
Green, beautiful
Safe
Attractive for high socioeconomic status international migrants
Social clustering Tervuren
Political factors
Policy surrounding migration is controversial, and is highly dependent on the elected party.
Immigrants only represented with vote at a local scale
There is a growing right-wing nationalist movement in Tervuren & Belgium generally partially because of increased immigration.
Central parties in coalition power now
Strong campaigning from Vlaams-Belang
N-VA was most voted → increased mistrust
Pre-existing political systems and disputes within Belgium lead to rising tensions.
Hostility toward French language from Dutch-speaking residents
French encouraged to speak Dutch at commune: not allowed to use international desk
Formation of diasporas
3 local, Dutch-speaking secondary schools
BSB
French speakers often commute to Brussels
Due to language barrier: limited mixing between BSB and local schools, and social clustering within local schools→ Dutch & French speakers
Religion: no mosques or synagogues: all in Brussels, but 10 different Christian churches
Victorian London: Perceptions
Dirty: “Vile”, smelly
Poverty tourism: judgement or to help → disempowering
Contrasting views:
Undeserving poor: criminals, healthy adults, ‘lack of morals’ → ‘deserve punisment’
Deserving poor: orphans, disables → should be helped
Victorian London: reality
Poverty
Hunger
Lack of sanitation
Solution: Workhouse
→ 1834 New Poor Laws
Intentionally bad conditions → encourage people to avoid it
Dangerous jobs
Very low pay
Did not solve poverty
London today: perceptions
Busy
Dangerous
High cost of living
Good services
Job & educational opportunities
Modern
Economic hub
Still deserving vs. undeserving poor mentality → people are claiming disability when not needed
London today: reality
Poor environmental quality
High crime rates
High cost of living
Ethnic diversity
2025 Spring Budget:
Stricter tests for disability payment
People under 22 cannot get incapacity benefits
Limited improvements for other disabled people unlike promised
→ harsher conditions: encourage them to work harder to get jobs
Future of funding in Cornwall
Post Brexit:
£130mn for 3 years from Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF) → before Brexit: £100mn per year: less than half
Starting 2024
Funding is essential: recognised as one of the poorest regions in EU
Boris Johnson promised levels of funding would remain at least the same → may create tensions
Loss of funding for projects e.g. Falmouth campus: continue cycle of poverty
Falmouth campus
Opened in 2013
Financed by EU and UK funds, e.g. EU cohesion policy
Student population of around 6,000
Many facilities, e.g. £30mn research centre
Falmouth campus: aims
Tackle issues such as:
Lack of accessibility to HE opportunities → students need to travel outside of Cornwall
Limited high-skilled job opportunities → downward cumulative causation
Lack of economic input