1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Cognitive Dissonance
When we have some sort of belief/behavior that doesn’t line up, it will cause cognitive tension
Leon festinger & seekers cult, grass hopper study, smoking and cancer, initiation study, free gift study, forbidden toy study
Ex. Smoking & cancer = cognitive dissonance (4 methods to fix)
deny situation= “its all correlational”
justify the behavior = “its okay to smoke every once in a while”
change the behavior = stop smoking, or “only long term chain smokers get consequences”
add a new behavior = “i do cardo 45 mins per day”
Ex. Initiation study
group a - asked to read list of body parts
group b - asked to read heavy sexual content infront of person
listened in to conversation about the science of pollination
group b more likely to come back than group a!
WHY - effort justification: “i did this embarrassing thing, but the group was great so it was worth it”
Ex. Eating grass hopper study
a mean, rude researcher asked them to eat the friend grasshopper instead of the normal food
most poeple say its good/ justified the rudeness of the researcher- WHY
why would thye eat this gross thing from this rude guy —
‘bc it was actually good’ OR
‘ beacause he was just messing around
reduce tension
Ex. Free gift study
Researcher allows them to take an appliance & gives them a choice between two after rating and invites them back after to re-rank
control = higher rated vs lower rated —> subject takes higher
experiment = same rating and choose between the two
when asked to re-rank much later —> Cognitive dissonance with equal products - focus on self chose product as greater than other not chose
Ex. Forbidden toy study
children told they cant play with a toy
control - if you play w toy there is a punishment
experimental - if you play with toy there is a [lighter] punishment
most didnt play w toys
Control = didn’t play = tension of play and punishment
Experimental - didn’t play = tension of why didn’t I play w the toy/inflated the punishment/ toy wasnt that great anyway
balance theory
If there are 3 links, and one of them is negative, there is a balance to return it to normal
motivation for something to change to return it to balance
Roomie(+),Gf(+), Prof (+)
Tension = Roomie (-) Prof (-), therefore something will change
Roomie and gf distanced from each other
Reactances
Something being taken away unfairly makes you desire it more
romeo and juliet effect
Ex. Parents involvement = “I forbid you to see [person] ” —> teen desires it more = “I want [person] more”