1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Courts of limited jurisdiction
court that has jurisdiction over misdemeanors and conducts preliminary investigations of felony charges; restricted in types of cases they may hear; specialized courts is a type of this court
Specialized courts
court that has primary jurisdiction over a specific types of offenses and operates differently than traditional criminal court; example is family court
Courts of general jurisdiction
state/federal court that has jurisdiction over felony charges
Appellate courts
court where appeals are made on points of law resulting from judgement of lower court
Trial court
conducts initial trial, hear witnesses, determine facts to reach a verdict
Appellate courts
court where appeals are made on points of law resulting from judgement of lower court
U.S. District Courts
trial courts of federal system; have jurisdiction over cases involving violations of federal law
U.S. Courts of Appeals/Circuit Courts
reviews federal and state appellate court cases on substantive and procedural issues involving rights guaranteed by Constitution; analyzes judicial interpretations of the law and reflect on constitutional issues involved in each case
Supreme Court
highest appellate body and court of last resort for all cases tried in various federal/state courts; chooses what cases they hear; shapes future meaning of Constitution
Only court mentioned in the constitution
Supreme Court
300
Amount of cases Supreme Court hears in a year
Rule of four
For a writ of certiorari to be granted, at least four justices must agree to hear the case
Writ of certiorari
an order to lower courts to send up case records for review
Type of cases that causes most congestion in state courts and % they take up
Traffic cases: 52.6%
Type of cases that cause the least congestion in state courts; % they take up
Juvenile cases causes least congestion (1.5%)
Ways someone becomes a judge
Appointed + Elected
Missouri Plan
Judicial nominating commission nominates candidates for bench
Elected official makes appointment from that list
Nonpartisan and noncompetitive elections occur where incumbent judges run on their records + voters can choose to retain or dismiss them
Arbitration
Simplified version of a trial; legally binding
Meditation
Less formal simplified version of a trial; helps parties come to an agreement; not legally binding
Role of Prosecutor
Represents state’s interest + serves as people’s attorney
Prosecutorial discretion
Prosecutor’s authority to decide whether to bring a case or trial to dismiss it outright
Common reason to dismiss a case
Evidence problems
Public defender
Counterpart of prosecuting attorney in criminal process; works with the arrestee in a trial
Ethical role conflict of defense attorney
Cannot allow client to knowingly perjure, must maintain confidentiality and advise client of constitutional requirements (something the prosecutor doesn’t have to worry about)
Steps that follow an arrest
Taken to station, detained until a complaint is filed, an arraignment is conducted
Bail
A form of security that is put up or exchanged to secure the release of an arrested person before the trial begins
Constitutional amendment that discusses bail
Eighth
Alternative bail release mechanisms
Police field citation release, Police station house citation release, police/pretrial jail citation release, pretrial/court direct release by pretrial bail program, police/court bail schedule
Pretrial detainees
People who are either denied bail or cannot afford to post it before a trial that are kept in confinement
Criticisms of bail
Works against the poor, legal effect, government cost
Pretrial services + what they provide
Gathering + verifying information about arrestees
Assessing each arrestee’s likelihood of failure to appear + chances of being rearrested
Providing supervision for defendants conditionally released + notifying court of any failure to comply with release conditions
Grand Jury
Group of individuals (16-23) that act as independent investigating body + determines whether an accusation by the state justifies trial; does not happen everywhere
Preliminary hearing
Hearing before a judge to determine whether the government has sufficient evidence to show probable cause that the defendant committed the crime; does not happen everywhere
Arraignment
When the judge informs the defendant of the charge + ensures that the accused is properly represented by counsel
Plea
How a defendant presents to the judge, jury, and attorneys how they claim they should be charged (guilty, not guilty, nolo contendere)
Plea bargain
A deal that benefits both the prosecution and the defendant (E.g. a shorter incarceration time for defendant and a guilty plea for the prosecution)
Pros of a Plea Bargain
Benefits both parties
Cost of prosecution is reduced
Administrative efficiency of courts is improved
Prosecution can devote time to more serious cases
Defendant avoids possible detention
Resources can be devoted more efficiently
Cons of plea bargain
Encourages defendants to waive constitutional right to trial
Allows dangerous offenders to receive lenient sentences
Raises danger that innocent person will be convicted of a crime
Prosecutors given free hand to induce/compel defendants to plea bargain
Innocent may admit guilty if they believe the system is biased
Reasons innocent people confess
The belief the system is biased
Prosecutor role during bargain
Weigh competing alternatives/factors
Defense role in plea bargain
Makes sure the defendant understands the nature of the process + the guilty plea
Judge role in plea bargain
Very limited role
Victim role in plea bargain
No role at all
Accused role in plea bargain
Must be informed of the rights they have when making a choice
Pretrial diversion program
A program that tries to bypass criminal prosecution by providing reasonable alternative in form of treatment, counseling, or employment programs
Trial
Open + public hearing designed to examine the facts of a case
Rights the defendant has in a trial
Impartial judge
To be competent at trial
To confront witnesses
Compulsory process
Impartial jury
To counsel at trial
Speedy trial
Public trial
To be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt
Order of a trial
Jury selection
Opening statements
Prosecution’s case
Criminal defense
Closing arguments
Instructions to jury
Deliberation + verdict
The sentence
appeals
Type of jury selection in U.S.
Venire —> Voir dire
Venire
Initial list of persons chosen for a jury
Voir dire
When jurors are examined under oath and those with an evident bias are removed
Challenge for cause
dismissal of prospective juror because they are biased
Peremptory challenge
enable attorneys to excuse jurors with no reason
Direct examination
initial questioning of one’s own witness during trial
Cross-examination
questioning of the opponent’s witnesses during trial
Directed verdict
When the attorney asks the judge to order the jury to return a verdict of not guilty
Jury nullification
Jury’s verdict not based on law or fact
General deterrence
people should be punished to set an example for others
Incapacitation
keeping dangerous criminals in confinement to eliminate the risk of repeating their offense in society
Specific deterrence
convincing offenders that pains of punishment are greater than benefits of crime, so they won’t repeat offending
Retribution/Just desert
punish offenders fairly and justly in a manner that is proportionate to the gravity of their crimes
Rehabilitation
justice system is obligated to help these unfortunate people + not punish them for their misdeeds
Diversion
court process is aimed at sparing nondangerous offenders from the stigma and labeling of criminal conviction + further involvement with the justice process
Equity/restitution
convicted criminals must pay back their victims for their loss and the justice system for the costs of processing their cases and society for any disruption they may have caused
Restoration
requires the convicted to recognize that they caused injury to personal/social relations + determination/acceptance of responsibility; repair injuries suffered by victim + community
Concurrent sentence
If a person is served more than one sentence, the length of the sentence is just the length of the longest sentence (e.g. one sentence is 3 years, and another is 10 years, they both start on the same day and then they will be released after 10 years)
Consecutive sentence
If a person is served more than one sentence, the length of the total sentence is the added amount of years total (e.g. one sentence is 3 years and another is 10 years, their total sentence is 13 years)
Good Time
Inmates can accrue ‘good time’ where they exhibit good behavior in order to get time off of their sentence
Indeterminate sentence
individualized sentences + sentence flexibility; offenders should only be confined until they are rehabilitated
Determinate sentence
fixed term of incarceration
Sentencing guidelines
Gives judges a recommended sentence based on seriousness of crime + background of offender
Sentencing Grid
A grid with prior record + current offenses as the two coordinates to set out specific punishments
Apprendi v. New Jersey influence on sentencing guidelines
any factor other than prior conviction that increases the penalty for the crime beyond statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
Blakely v. Washington influence on sentencing guidelines
proving state of mind must be determined by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
U.S. v. Booker influence on sentencing guidelines
federal guidelines were unconstitutional, allowing that judges should consider the guideline ranges but must be permitted to alter sentences in considering of other factors
Mandatory sentences
Statutory requirement that a certain penalty shall be set and carried out in all cases upon conviction for a specified offense or series of offenses
Legal factors that influence sentencing
Severity of offense
Offender’s prior criminal record
Whether the offender used violence
Whether the offender used weapons
Whether the crime was committed for money `
Extralegal factors that influence sentencing
Social class: lower class more likely to get a longer sentence
Gender: women receive more favorable outcomes the further they go in the system
Age: expected for older people to get harsher punishments since they’ve been in the system longer and would have more priors
Victim characteristics: sentences may be reduced when victims have ‘negative’ personal characteristics
Race: young black men are more likely to be imprisoned