1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Is a desire to have relationships inborn?
Yep
A need to belong is a basic human motive, same with a desire to have social contact and have rewarding relationships
A good network of social ties predicts health happiness and high self esteem
Process of forming close relationships
1) first time encounter + initial attraction
- ppl are attracted to ppl who can make them feel rewarded
2) Courtship → process of falling in love
3) Enter a formal and committed relationship
Factors that affect attraction
1) Physical proximity & frequency of contact
ppl are more likely to fall in love w someone they see often/live close by (exposure effect)
2) physical attractiveness
attractive faces capture attention, human bias for beauty, everyone likes hot people
3) Similarity
Same demographic, lvl of attractiveness, opinions, experiences, personality
Why r we attracted to hot ppl?
Beauty is used to turn heads and capture attention, can be used as a social resource to be more convincing
Convincing ppl are usually likeable
What does a beautiful face look like?
Subjective, but generally symmetrical faces are considered pretty.
Two stage model of attraction
We first avoid dissimilar others, then approach similar others for continued contact
Partner preferences
Women → older, financially resourceful men (supportive)
Men → young and pretty (fertile)
Components of courtship
Scoping the potential, Communicating romantic intent, contact
Stimulus Value Role theory
We progress thru 3 stages to develop a relationship
Stimulus → attraction to someone
Attachment → Value (assessing compatibility by comparing values/beliefs)
Role → Commitment (deciding what roles to assume into in the relationship)
Social Exchange theory
economic model of human behaviour
Ø people as motivated to maximize benefits and minimize costs in their relationships with others
Ø relationships that provide more rewards and fewer costs will be more satisfying and endure longer
Commitment
Made up of relationship satisfaction, investment minus quality level of alternative situations
Is a transformation of motivation bc instead of indivdual outcomes we r striving for a joint outcome
Commitment leads to relationship maintenance mechanisms, eg accomodations and willingness to sacrifice
Equity theory
Theory that explains how social exchanges operates in relationships through a ratio
Your benefits/contributions = partner benefits/contributions
can be overbenefited/underbenefited
Exchange relationship
characterized by an immediate reciprocal repayment of benefits
In these situations, people want costs to be quickly offset by compensation,
leaving the balance at zero (very calculative)
Communal relationship
partners respond to each other’s needs and wellbeing over time and in different ways
without regard too much for whether they have given or received a benefit
Attachment
Secure → don’t worry too much about others being dependent on me or me being dependent on others. Easy to get along w others and i dont really fear being abandoned
Insecure-avoidant → Feels uncomfortable getting close to others, cant trust lovers completely and cant rlly depend on them
Insecure- anxious → Ppl don’t get close as I like, i fear abandonment and that my lover doesnt love me, strong desire for love
How are attachments formed
Experiences with attachment figure → form scripts → scripts build into internal working models → become stable and form attachments
Sternberg’s triarchic theory of love
Passion Intimacy and Commitment
Gottman’s 4 horsemen of the apocalypse
Criticism, contempt (degrading), defensiveness, stonewalling
Demand withdrawal pattern of communication
Partner makes a demand and other partner withdrawals from situation, associated with negative marital outcomes
Negative reciprocity
One partner responds to another partner with the same or increased levels of negativity, get stuck in toxic cycle instead of finding a way to resolve negativity