1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
When did Germany leave the LofN
1933
When was the Rihneland Remillitariesd
1936
When did Anschluss happen
1938
When did the Sudetenland crisis happen
1938
Adolf Hitler claimed that the 3 million ethnic Germans living in the Sudetenland were being mistreated by the Czechoslovak government. He used this as an excuse to demand that the territory be handed over to Germany.
The Munich Agreement[a] was reached in Munich on 30 September 1938, by Nazi Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy. The agreement provided for the German annexation of part of Czechoslovakia called the Sudetenland, where three million people, mainly ethnic Germans, lived.[1] The pact is known in some areas as the Munich Betrayal (Czech: Mnichovská zrada; Slovak: Mníchovská zrada), because of a previous 1924 alliance agreement[2] and a 1925 military pact between France and the Czechoslovak Republic.
When did Hitler’s policy stop being reversing Versailles, and being agressisve
39, Czechoslovakia and Poland
Why did conditions favour Hitler
in the east, the states were ‘artificial’ and contained lost of Germans. They were weak. Perfect for Hitler’s Lebensraum
When was the Anglo-German naval agreement
1935, which allowed Hitler 35% of British naval strength
Why did Italy and Germany get closer
Italy felt betrayed by UK and F over Abyssinia
Why did no one stop Hitler, 4 reasons
1)At first he seemed like a Nationalist, trying to overturn Versailles, with legitimate grievances
He acts with good faith
2)When he left rearmament conference he promised the size of army would be 300,000 men.
3)When he built the air force, he said it would be half the size of France
4)He is seen as a anti communist
Cooper, British Foreign Sec said
the British people don’t give 2 hoots about Germany reoccupying part of their own territory
What did Lord Halifax say
Germany is ‘bulwark’ against communism, and there could be ‘possible alterations’, after the ‘passage of time’
all about peaceful evolution
Arguments about the Hossbach conference
not a plan for occupying Europe
More about reassuring aristocratic Generals, as if it is about a war plan, then why no Himmler
convince them that Germany needed expansion
pressure them to accept his long‑term goals
test their loyalty
Key notes of the confrence
Case 1
1)they cant hide the fact they are rearming
2)the rest of the world is rearming
3)the Wermacht is ageing, and needs to be maintained and fear birth rates drop for army
4) Must act by 43-45
Case 2
if France develop domestic crisis, the time for action against czechosolovakia has come
Case 3
If France is involved in a war with another state and therefore unable to act against Germany, Germany should seize the opportunity to expand eastwards by taking Austria and Czechoslovakia. In this situation, Poland would be forced to remain neutral in the event of a German war against France.
Key Summary of Hossbach
1)Lebensraum to become self sufficient and stop threat to Ger’s flank
2) time is not on Germany’s side
3) Armament - they are strongest now and must act
4) element of supprise of secret wepon - incuding uboat
5)declining birhtrate - the need of soilders
6)Austria and Cezoslovakia must be attacked simultateously
more about scaring and testing the Generals, as the onyl Nazis there are Hitler and Goerring who is head of airforce.
What are some factors against Anschluss
Most Austrians want to be German, not Nazis
Many feared the Nazis, as the Austrian chancellor Dollfuss murdered by Nazi in the coup
The Austrian Nazis attempted a coup in 34
Reasons for Anschluss
Agitation of Austrian Nazis
Austrian chancellor confronted Hitler to get the Nazis to backdown in Austria. Hitler called him a traitor to his blood.
The Austrian chancellor called for a referendum, so Hitler must act quick
As Mussolini and Austrians did not oppoise, Hitler decided to perform Anschluss rather than instal puppet
Why is appeasement not necessarily cowardice?
it is about settling dispute peacefully, and addressing legit grievances through orderly change and agreement
What is the playbook of UK foreign policy
minimalize engagement with Europe
deal with whatever government is necessary
make acceptable concessions that does not harm UK intrests
concrete commitment / threat (but this needs to be backed up, but UK not at a position to be tough at the time)
War
appeasement has been used a long time
How might the idea of a global British empire affect the idea of appeasement?
Japan → southeast Asia
Italy → Egypt
Soviets→ India
Stresa front
France is paranoid, and strategically dependent on UK, but over the English Channel
Mussolini is looking for a friend and fears that Anschluss might lead to return of South Tyrol
Mussolini hopped that Stresa front might stop Anschluss
Italy mis took UK and France for the green light to invade Abyssinia
But no! so Mussolini felt betrayed and shifted to Adolf
1935
to contain Ger
Spain
Royalists vs Leftists
Franco was flown by Luftwaffe from Morroco to Spain
Hitler use spain as a testing ground
Examples to show that appeasement follow playbook
Rhineland, and the anglo german naval agreement, as UK is still superior naval power
and chamberlin still getting radar ready
Breaking the myth of appeasement as bad (6 thigs)
war is costly, 6 - 11% of British men died
Depression
In 1933 Oxford union 275:153 voted ‘this house under no circumstances will fight for king and country’ (caputures the mood in institutions)
Britain has no Ally as the US is still isolationist
Treasury can’t afford war
War Office can’t win war
Why was appeasement a sucess?
it helped delay war so Britain can build up air force and radar
they won the battle of Britain
Appeasement is accompanied by rearmament
Backround to Stalin in 1930s
His aim is to protect the 3 main cities - Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad
He needs buffer zone against the Great European Plain
Russia invaded by Napoleon and by Germany , twice in 100 years
He shot most of his officers and his army is made up of conscripts
Stalin’s attempt to forge good relations with west
In 1935 Communist International, stalin give speech in favour of LofN and collective security
Litvinov was a Jew appointed to be foreign secretry (who was married to a daughter of Oxford history don)
But UK and France ignore Stalin
So Stalin wants to look for an ally in Europe
France does not want to replicate a pact with Russia against Germany like before WW1 as ideological difference, and they allied with Poland
Biggest Mistake of UK and F in 1930s
Push away Russia and Italy
Why Nazi Soviet Pact
to form buffer zone
and both Ger and Stalin diplomatically isolated
The Russian deputy foreign Minister said to French Ambassador : ‘My friend' what have you done!’ ‘We see no other outcome than the 4th partition of poland’
23 August 1939
Nazi Soviet Pact
Non aggression pact
Lord Palmerston 1848 said ‘we have no eternal allies and we have no perpetual enemies, Our interests are eternal and perpetual’
Buffer zone
Stalin tried UK and F but not work so look to Ger
He gave speech he will be neutral in capitalist ware and replaced Litvinov with Molotov as Nazis no deal with Jew
in April 39 Chamberlin negotiate to USSR
Aug 39 UK military Mission to Moscow, 23 August 1939 already signed
UK military Mission want to form alliance with Russia to deter Germany from attacking poland
But by Aug, Ribbentrop already negotiated with Molotov about Lithuania
Chamberlin’s assumption of USSR and Nazi not working because of ideology failed
Admiral Drax, who travelled by ship then train was too late
Chamberlin’s war
Polish guarantee
war breakout in’39
By aug 39, Chamberlin on Holiday as war is still not imminent
15 Aug, crisis over danzig
10 Aug Hitler send ultimatum to Poland
15 Aug Seed want a swift agreement to open Romanian and Polish border to red army to pass through, so Red Army cand defend against Nazi
Summary
from 38 into 39 Hitler is not uniting German or revising Versaille
Collective security proven to be fake
Hitler only know about power
Hitler’s aim is east, so will war happen if UK and F backed down?
What was the Saar plebiscite
In 1935, the Saarland, a German region placed under League of Nations control by the Treaty of Versailles, held a plebiscite in which over 90% voted to rejoin Germany, allowing Hitler to regain the Saar peacefully and weaken the Treaty while boosting his popularity.
Why did Hitler leave the LofN
the LofN created after Versaille and liked to Ger’s defeat so he wanted to leave
Also, Failure of the Disarmament Conference in 1933, France insisted Germany must remain restricted under the Treaty of Versailles, so Hitler thought it was unfair as France did not disarm
Key Dates
1933 → Germany leaves League of Nations
(Rejects international oversight)
1934 → Non-aggression pact with Poland
(Peaceful relations with Poland)
1935 → Reintroduction of conscription & Luftwaffe
(Remilitarisation begins)
1936 March→ Remilitarisation of the Rhineland
(Defies Treaty of Versailles)
1936 → Rome-Berlin Axis formed
(Alliance with Fascist Italy)
1937 → Involvement in Spanish Civil War
1938 March → Anschluss with Austria
(Annexes Austria into Germany)
1938 September→ Munich Agreement / Sudetenland crisis
(Takes Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia peacefully)
1939 March → Occupation of Czechoslovakia
(Breaks Munich Agreement, seizes rest of Czechoslovakia)
1939 → Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact
(Agrees not to fight USSR; secretly plans Poland invasion)
1939 → Invasion of Poland
(Triggers WWII)
why did France not form pact with Russia despite Stalin effort
France does not want to replicate a pact with Russia against Germany like before WW1 as ideological difference, and they allied with Poland
Problem with UK and Russia negotiating
in April 39 Chamberlin negotiate to USSR
11Aug 39 UK military Mission to Moscow, but negotiation between Ger and Russia already ongoing, 23 August 1939 already signed
UK military Mission want to form alliance with Russia to deter Germany from attacking poland
But by Aug, Ribbentrop already negotiated with Molotov about Lithuania
Chamberlin’s assumption of USSR and Nazi not working because of ideology failed
Admiral Drax, who travelled by ship then train was too late