CHAPTER 3: Evaluating Moral Arguments

0.0(0)
Studied by 4 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/41

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary-focused flashcards covering key terms from evaluating moral arguments, including argument structure, validity, premises, conclusions, and common fallacies.

Last updated 11:49 PM on 8/27/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

42 Terms

1
New cards

Statement

An assertion that something is or is not the case; it can be true or false.

2
New cards

Claim

A statement that a particular assertion is true; what someone argues to be the case and hopes others will accept.

3
New cards

Premise

A supporting statement in an argument that provides reasons for the conclusion.

4
New cards

Conclusion

The statement that is supposed to be supported by the premises.

5
New cards

Indicator words

Words that signal premises or conclusions (e.g., therefore signals the conclusion; because signals a premise).

6
New cards

Argument

A group of statements, one of which (the conclusion) is supported by the rest (the premises).

7
New cards

Deductive argument

An argument intended to give logically conclusive support to its conclusion.

8
New cards

Inductive argument

An argument that offers probable, not conclusive, support for its conclusion.

9
New cards

Valid argument

A deductive argument whose premises, if true, guarantee that the conclusion is true.

10
New cards

Invalid argument

A deductive argument whose form allows the premises to be true while the conclusion is false.

11
New cards

Strong argument

An inductive argument that, if the premises are true, makes the conclusion probably true.

12
New cards

Weak argument

An inductive argument that does not provide probable support for the conclusion.

13
New cards

Sound argument

A valid argument with true premises.

14
New cards

Cogent argument

A strong argument with true premises.

15
New cards

Implicit premises / Implied premises

Premises not stated but assumed or hidden in an argument.

16
New cards

Unstated premises

Premises that are not explicitly stated but are needed to connect the premises to the conclusion.

17
New cards

Counterexample

An example that shows an argument form or generalization to be false or that a conclusion does not follow.

18
New cards

Counterexample method

Testing validity by constructing a twin argument with the same form but true premises and a false conclusion.

19
New cards

Modus ponens

If p, then q. p. Therefore, q. A valid argument form.

20
New cards

Modus tollens

If p, then q. Not q. Therefore, not p. A valid argument form.

21
New cards

Denying the antecedent

If p, then q. Not p. Therefore, not q. An invalid form.

22
New cards

Affirming the consequent

If p, then q. q. Therefore, p. An invalid form.

23
New cards

Hypothetical syllogism

If p then q. If q then r. Therefore, if p then r. A valid form.

24
New cards

Conditional

A sentence of the form if p, then q; the statement is a conditional.

25
New cards

Antecedent

The 'if' part of a conditional (the p in if p, then q).

26
New cards

Consequent

The 'then' part of a conditional (the q in if p, then q).

27
New cards

Moral statement

A statement affirming that an action is right or wrong, or that a person is good or bad.

28
New cards

Nonmoral statement

A statement about a state of affairs that does not assert rightness or wrongness.

29
New cards

Moral premise

A general moral principle or standard used to derive a moral conclusion.

30
New cards

Nonmoral premise

A fact about a state of affairs (nonmoral) used to connect a moral principle to a specific case.

31
New cards

Diagramming

Diagramming arguments to identify premises, conclusions, and their relationships.

32
New cards

Begging the Question

Arguing in a circle; using the conclusion as a premise (p is true because p is true).

33
New cards

Equivocation

Using a term with two meanings in different senses within an argument.

34
New cards

Appeal to Authority

Relying on the opinion of someone not truly an expert in the designated field.

35
New cards

Slippery Slope

Arguing that a first action will lead inevitably to disaster without solid justification.

36
New cards

Faulty Analogy

Using a weak or irrelevant analogy to support a conclusion.

37
New cards

Appeal to Ignorance

Arguing that lack of evidence proves something true or false.

38
New cards

Straw Man

Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.

39
New cards

Ad Hominem (Appeal to the Person)

Rejecting a claim based on the person who makes it rather than the claim itself.

40
New cards

Hasty Generalization

Drawing a broad conclusion from a small or unrepresentative sample.

41
New cards

Moral reasoning

Ordinary critical reasoning applied to ethics and moral issues.

42
New cards

Moral argument

An argument whose conclusion is a moral judgment about right/wrong or good/bad.

Explore top notes

Explore top flashcards

flashcards
25-26 - E2 U1 | Quizlet
30
Updated 208d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
FR4H - Paris Chapître 1 Vocab
47
Updated 916d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
El mundo hispanohablante
118
Updated 190d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
unit four: box note 1-24
60
Updated 886d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Unité 7 Atelier A
36
Updated 749d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
PPOM 1 Week 1 (LEC 2-13)
335
Updated 406d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
25-26 - E2 U1 | Quizlet
30
Updated 208d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
FR4H - Paris Chapître 1 Vocab
47
Updated 916d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
El mundo hispanohablante
118
Updated 190d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
unit four: box note 1-24
60
Updated 886d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Unité 7 Atelier A
36
Updated 749d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
PPOM 1 Week 1 (LEC 2-13)
335
Updated 406d ago
0.0(0)