1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
sybil B thesis
Sybil Birling reflects the cruelty, ignorance and hypocrisy of the wealthy middle and upper classes. Her ideals directly oppose Inspector Goole’s (and therefore Priestley’s) socialist aspirations.
Mrs. Birlings role
represents cruelty and arrogance of most powerful people in society
What does Sybil Birling symbolise?
Sybil Birling misuses her social power, valuing status and enforcing class divisions
She is hypocritical, blaming the poor for their situation while excusing her own family
Represents the older generation’s refusal to accept responsibility, contrasting with Sheila and Eric’s willingness to change
Sybil Birling language analysis
Priestley uses a range of techniques to make Sybil Birling a deeply unlikeable caricature who represents the callousness attitude of the wealthy towards the poor:
Dramatic irony: The audience knows Eric is Eva’s father before Sybil does, highlighting her ignorance
Dismissive language: Sybil shows disdain for Eva, calling her “girls of that class” and avoiding her name, emphasising class prejudice and lack of empathy
Sybil Birling’s character development
Act 1: She is dismissive of lower classes: Sybil Birling is introduced as cold and prejudiced. She tells her husband off for praising the cook, is dismissive of Inspector Goole, and unsympathetic towards Eva Smith’s plight.
Act 2 : She abuses her power: Mrs Birling calls Gerald’s affair with Eva “disgusting”, but reveals that she abused her power over Eva Smith in an even worse way by denying her and her unborn child charitable support. She did not consider Eva to be “deserving”, and blamed the child’s father. She is shocked when Eric is revealed to be the father.
Act 3: She rejects social responsibility: While shaken by the news of Eric’s involvement in Eva’s tragic fate, Mrs Birling refuses to accept any responsibility of her own. After the Inspector leaves, she celebrates the possibility of Eva’s death being a hoax, and chastises Sheila for believing the Inspector’s message.
“Girls of that class—” (Act 2)
AO2: The demonstrative determiner “that” and collective noun “class” reduce Eva to a stereotype, showing Mrs Birling’s entrenched class prejudice. The dash acts as a caesura, implying disgust and an inability to even articulate her contempt.
AO3: Reflects Edwardian social hierarchy (1912) where the upper classes felt morally superior; Priestley (writing in 1945) criticises this to promote post-war socialist equality.
Zoom in: “that class” → distancing, dehumanising language that strips Eva of identity.
“I did nothing I’m ashamed of.” (Act 2)
AO2: The definitive declarative and first-person pronoun “I” highlight her self-righteousness; the absolute negative “nothing” shows total rejection of guilt.
AO3: Priestley attacks capitalist individualism, suggesting the upper classes refuse accountability for the suffering they cause.
Zoom in: “nothing” → uncompromising, absolute denial of responsibility.
“I think she only had herself to blame.” (Act 2)
AO2: The modal verb “think” gives a veneer of reasonableness, masking a harsh victim-blaming ideology. The reflexive pronoun “herself” shifts all responsibility onto Eva.
AO3: Mirrors upper-class attitudes that poverty was due to personal failure, not systemic inequality—Priestley critiques this belief.
Zoom in: “herself” → isolates Eva as solely responsible, erasing societal factors.
“As if a girl of that sort would ever refuse money!” (Act 2)
AO2: The exclamative and rhetorical tone convey outrage; “that sort” is derogatory, generalising diction that dehumanises Eva.
AO3: Priestley exposes the hypocrisy of the upper class who assume moral superiority yet lack compassion.
Zoom in: “that sort” → dismissive phrase implying moral inferiority.
“Go and look for the father of the child. It’s his responsibility.” (Act 2)
AO2: The imperative verb “Go” asserts dominance; the noun “responsibility” is structurally ironic as she refuses to accept her own.
AO3: Dramatic irony—the audience knows she is unknowingly condemning Eric, her own son, reinforcing Priestley’s message that everyone is interconnected.
Zoom in: “responsibility” → central motif of the play; she weaponises it against others but rejects it herself.