Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Theory
It is defined as “systematic reflection on phenomena, designed to explain them and to show how they are related in a meaningful, intelligent pattern instead of being merely random items in an incoherent universe
It is also defined as “a way of making the world or some part of it more intelligible or better understood” by going “beyond mere description of the phenomenon observed and engaging in causal explanation or prediction based on certain prior occurrences or conditions”
Ontology and Epistemology
Basic Assumption in International Relations
Ontology
The world is knowable and comprehensible via sense perception and analysis
Epistemology
We can discern patterns in past and ongoing occurrences; we can utilize our observations and make predictions about the future
Positivism
Objective reality that is relatively obvious and can be accurately known and measure
Post-positivism
Skeptical that there is any knowledge which is objective. All events are subject to interpretation and bias
Anarchy, Statism, Survival, and Self-Help
Basic assumptions of Realism
Realism
The implication of this theory worldwide:
Competition and conflict and the inherent dimension of international relations
State leaders cannot be tightly bound by ethical constraints in international relations
Classical realist
Roof conflictual and competitive nature of international system in “human nature”
Uncertainty drives fear, suspicion, distrust, etc.
This is how humans behave under conditions of anarchy
Draw upon assumptions of Hobbes and Machiavelli
Neorealist
Argue that it is not “human nature” but the structure of the international system that makes it conflictual
Amidst conditions of uncertainty and anarchy, it is perfectly rational for states to at in order to maximize their power
Certain configurations of the power will produce different results in terms of stability and state interaction
Polarity
International relation, polarity refers to the distribution of power among states in the global system
Unipolarity
Occurs when there is a single dominant or superpower in the international system. This superpower possesses significantly more military, economic, and political influence than any other state or group of states.
Bipolarity
Occurs when two powers or blocs of states dominate the international system, often engaging in rivalry and competition for influence and control
Multipolarity
There are multiple significant powers in the international system, and no single state or group of states can exert predominant influence
Progress/Change, Non-Uniformity of state, Cooperation, and Institutions
Basic assumptions of Liberalism
Liberalism
The implication of this theory are:
Predictability and cooperation can be gained in international relations through repeated political and economic interaction— leads to creation of interdependence”
Can replicate structure of law and create “global governance” (regulation and coordination of transnational issues areas by states, international regimes) even in the absence of global government
States who defy global community and isolate themselves from international interaction are threats to international peace and cooperation
Classical liberalism
Rooted in the values and ideals of the Enlightenment
International politics should foster free trade and enhance global commerce which creates interdependence
Structural Neoliberalism
More of a positivist scientific theory - must separate between facts and values
Global commerce and democratic political systems create incentives for cooperation and stability, but it is not automatic
Totality, Materialism, and Class Conflict
Basic assumptions of Marxism
Marxist
Implication of this theory are:
Material conditions drive outcomes at the international level
like a domestic economy, global politics has “classes” and relations of inequality which lock states into system of structural conflict
In these relations, poorer states/regions are at a systematic disadvantage. They will be systematically exploited by wealthy states
Social construction, Institutions, and Ideal power
Basic assumptions of Constructivism
Constructivism
Implication worldwide of this theory:
It questions “how does change occur?”
“Why us there not Constant Change”
Suggests that the identity and self-understanding of key international actors such as states and organizations is what drives how they behave
Gender as “Social construction” , “Gendered” assumptions/actions shape behavior, and “Where are the women?”
Basic Assumptions of Feminism
International System
The environment in which states and other global actors interact, the institutions and rile which guide and shape the interation, and the outcomes which this interaction produces
Peace of Westphalia
Peace agreement to bring an end of a series of a decades-long religious wars that had torn Europe apart from the 14th-17th centuries
The Cold war
Two major global powers that emerge after WWII are the US and the Soviet Union
Actors
International relations can be likened to a series of actions that promote interactions between states. Actors are objects that participate in or promote IR.
State leaders and Bureaucratic organizations
Types of State Actors
State leaders
Head of the government or the head of the state or both
The most powerful political figure
The key individual actors in IR, regardless of whether these leaders are democratically elected or dictators
Non-State Actors
Individuals or organizations that have powerful economic, political or social power and are able to influence at national and sometimes international level but do not belong to or allied themselves to any particular country or state.
Intergovernmental, Non-governmental organization, Multi-national Corporations, and Substate Actors
Types of Non-State Actors
Intergovernmental Organization
Established by different states (national governemnt)
IGO usually organized by their membership with aims of achieving specific goal or purpose
Non-governmental Organization
It is established by two or more individuals rather than by states (private).
NGO are example of this organizationMNGOs are examples of this organization
Multi-national Corporations
Active across the state borders. Based in one states but have branches operating in other states
Substate actors or Terrorist
Actively involved in IR. They creates threats, violence, and terror for the entire community of nations